Literature DB >> 343152

A systems-analytical approach to macro-evolutionary phenomena.

R Riedl.   

Abstract

Two sets of evolutionary phenomena find no explanation through current theory. For the static phenomena (such as homology, homonomy, systematic weight, and "Type") there is no causal base, although these principles are responsible for all phenomena of predictable order in the living world. The dynamic phenomena (such as homodynamy, coadaptation, parallel evolution, orthogenesis, Cartesian transformation, typostrophy, hetermorphosis, systemic mutation, and spontaneous atavism) have no causal explanation, although they are responsible for all directed phenomena in macroevolution. These phenomena share one unifying principle which can be explained by a system theory of evolution based on, but extending, the current synthetic theory. This system theory envisages feedback conditions between genotype and phenotype by which the chances of successful adaptation increase if the genetic units, by insertion of superimposed genes, copy the functional dependencies of those phene structures for which they code. This positive feedback of the adaptive speed (or probability) within a single adaptive direction is compensated by negative feedback in most of the alternative directions. The negative feedback operates as selection not be environmental but by systemic conditions developed by the organization of the organism. The consequences are an imitatively organized system of gene interractions, the rehabilitation of classical systematics, the reality of the "natural system," and, in general, the resolution of the contradiction between neodarwinists and their critics, between reductionists and holists, between "a priori" and "a posteriori" views, between idealism and materialism, and between the notions of freedom and of purpose in evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 343152     DOI: 10.1086/410123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q Rev Biol        ISSN: 0033-5770            Impact factor:   4.875


  22 in total

1.  Complex constraints on allometry revealed by artificial selection on the wing of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Geir H Bolstad; Jason A Cassara; Eladio Márquez; Thomas F Hansen; Kim van der Linde; David Houle; Christophe Pélabon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Why should we investigate the morphological disparity of plant clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Birth, life and death of developmental control genes: new challenges for the homology concept.

Authors:  Günter Theissen
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 1.919

Review 4.  The proper place of hopeful monsters in evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Günter Theissen
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 1.919

5.  Saltational evolution: hopeful monsters are here to stay.

Authors:  Günter Theissen
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 1.919

6.  Body plan innovation in treehoppers through the evolution of an extra wing-like appendage.

Authors:  Benjamin Prud'homme; Caroline Minervino; Mélanie Hocine; Jessica D Cande; Aïcha Aouane; Héloïse D Dufour; Victoria A Kassner; Nicolas Gompel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Is life law-like?

Authors:  Kenneth M Weiss; Anne V Buchanan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Contingency and entrenchment in protein evolution under purifying selection.

Authors:  Premal Shah; David M McCandlish; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

10.  Mutation predicts 40 million years of fly wing evolution.

Authors:  David Houle; Geir H Bolstad; Kim van der Linde; Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.