Literature DB >> 34315014

Predictors of having naloxone in urban and rural Oregon findings from NHBS and the OR-HOPE study.

Lauren Lipira1, Gillian Leichtling2, Ryan R Cook3, Judith M Leahy4, E Roberto Orellana5, P Todd Korthuis6, Timothy W Menza7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Naloxone is an opioid antagonist that can be effectively administered by bystanders to prevent overdose. We determined the proportion of people who had naloxone and identified predictors of naloxone ownership among two samples of people who inject drugs (PWID) who use opioids in Portland and rural Western Oregon. BASIC PROCEDURES: We used data from participants in Portland's National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS, N = 477) and the Oregon HIV/Hepatitis and Opioid Prevention and Engagement Study (OR-HOPE, N = 133). For each sample, we determined the proportion of participants who had naloxone and estimated unadjusted and adjusted relative risk of having naloxone associated with participant characteristics. MAIN
FINDINGS: Sixty one percent of NHBS and 30 % of OR-HOPE participants had naloxone. In adjusted analysis, having naloxone was associated with female gender, injecting goofballs (compared to heroin alone), housing stability, and overdose training in the urban NHBS sample, and having naloxone was associated with drug of choice, frequency of injection, and race in the rural OR-HOPE sample. In both samples, having naloxone was crudely associated with SSP use, but this was attenuated after adjustment. PRINCIPAL
CONCLUSIONS: Naloxone ownership was insufficient and highly variable among two samples of PWID who use opioids in Oregon. People who use methamphetamine, males, and people experiencing homelessness may be at increased risk for not having naloxone and SSP may play a key role in improving access.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IDU; Naloxone; Opioids; Overdose; Regional

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34315014      PMCID: PMC8464511          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.852


  44 in total

1.  Awareness, Possession, and Use of Take-Home Naloxone Among Illicit Drug Users, Vancouver, British Columbia, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Seonaid Nolan; Jane Buxton; Sabina Dobrer; Huiru Dong; Kanna Hayashi; M J Milloy; Thomas Kerr; Julio Montaner; Evan Wood
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  How competent are people who use opioids at responding to overdoses? Qualitative analyses of actions and decisions taken during overdose emergencies.

Authors:  Joanne Neale; Caral Brown; Aimee N C Campbell; Jermaine D Jones; Verena E Metz; John Strang; Sandra D Comer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Use of Naloxone by Emergency Medical Services during Opioid Drug Overdose Resuscitation Efforts.

Authors:  Steven Allan Sumner; Melissa C Mercado-Crespo; M Bridget Spelke; Leonard Paulozzi; David E Sugerman; Susan D Hillis; Christina Stanley
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Association Between State Laws Facilitating Pharmacy Distribution of Naloxone and Risk of Fatal Overdose.

Authors:  Rahi Abouk; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula; David Powell
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Awareness and access to naloxone necessary but not sufficient: Examining gaps in the naloxone cascade.

Authors:  Karin Tobin; Catie Clyde; Melissa Davey-Rothwell; Carl Latkin
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2018-07-31

6.  Prevention of fatal opioid overdose.

Authors:  Leo Beletsky; Josiah D Rich; Alexander Y Walley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Non-fatal overdose as a risk factor for subsequent fatal overdose among people who inject drugs.

Authors:  Alexander Caudarella; Huiru Dong; M J Milloy; Thomas Kerr; Evan Wood; Kanna Hayashi
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 8.  A systematic review of community opioid overdose prevention and naloxone distribution programs.

Authors:  Angela K Clark; Christine M Wilder; Erin L Winstanley
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.702

9.  Risks of fatal opioid overdose during the first year following nonfatal overdose.

Authors:  Mark Olfson; Melanie Wall; Shuai Wang; Stephen Crystal; Carlos Blanco
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Impacts of an opioid overdose prevention intervention delivered subsequent to acute care.

Authors:  Caleb J Banta-Green; Phillip O Coffin; Joseph O Merrill; Jeanne M Sears; Chris Dunn; Anthony S Floyd; Lauren K Whiteside; Norbert D Yanez; Dennis M Donovan
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.399

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gaps in naloxone ownership among people who inject drugs during the fentanyl wave of the opioid overdose epidemic in New York City, 2018.

Authors:  Alexis V Rivera; Michelle L Nolan; Denise Paone; Sidney A Carrillo; Sarah L Braunstein
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  "It wasn't here, and now it is. It's everywhere": fentanyl's rising presence in Oregon's drug supply.

Authors:  Sarah S Shin; Kate LaForge; Erin Stack; Justine Pope; Gillian Leichtling; Jessica E Larsen; Judith M Leahy; Andrew Seaman; Daniel Hoover; Laura Chisholm; Christopher Blazes; Robin Baker; Mikaela Byers; Katie Branson; P Todd Korthuis
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2022-07-11

3.  A cross-sectional survey of potential factors, motivations, and barriers influencing research participation and retention among people who use drugs in the rural USA.

Authors:  Angela T Hetrick; April M Young; Miriam R Elman; Sarann Bielavitz; Rhonda L Alexander; Morgan Brown; Elizabeth Needham Waddell; P Todd Korthuis; Kathryn E Lancaster
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.