Literature DB >> 31058922

Association Between State Laws Facilitating Pharmacy Distribution of Naloxone and Risk of Fatal Overdose.

Rahi Abouk1, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula2,3, David Powell4.   

Abstract

Importance: Given high rates of opioid-related fatal overdoses, improving naloxone access has become a priority. States have implemented different types of naloxone access laws (NALs) and there is controversy over which of these policies, if any, can curb overdose deaths. We hypothesize that NALs granting direct authority to pharmacists to provide naloxone will have the greatest potential for reducing fatal overdoses.
Objectives: To identify which types of NALs, if any, are associated with reductions in fatal overdoses involving opioids and examine possible implications for nonfatal overdoses. Design, Setting, and Participants: State-level changes in both fatal and nonfatal overdoses from 2005 to 2016 were examined across the 50 states and the District of Columbia after adoption of NALs using a difference-in-differences approach while estimating the magnitude of the association for each year relative to time of adoption. Policy environments across full state populations were represented in the primary data set. The association for 3 types of NALs was associated: NALs providing direct authority to pharmacists to prescribe, NALs providing indirect authority to prescribe, and other NALs. The study was conducted from January 2017 to January 2019. Exposures: Fatal and nonfatal overdoses in states that adopted NAL laws were compared with those in states that did not adopt NAL laws. Further consideration was given to the type of NAL passed in terms of its association with these outcomes. We hypothesize that NALs granting direct authority to pharmacists to provide naloxone will have the greatest potential for reducing fatal overdoses. Main Outcomes and Measures: Fatal overdoses involving opioids were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were nonfatal overdoses resulting in emergency department visits and Medicaid naloxone prescriptions.
Results: In this evaluation of the dispensing of naloxone across the United States, NALs granting direct authority to pharmacists were associated with significant reductions in fatal overdoses, but they may also increase nonfatal overdoses seen in emergency department visits. The effect sizes for fatal overdoses grew over time relative to adoption of the NALs. These policies were estimated to reduce opioid-rated fatal overdoses by 0.387 (95% CI, 0.119-0.656; P = .007) per 100 000 people in 3 or more years after adoption. There was little evidence of an association for indirect authority to dispense (increase by 0.121; 95% CI, -0.014 to 0.257; P = .09) and other NALs (increase by 0.094; 95% CI, -0.040 to 0.227; P = .17). Conclusions and Relevance: Although many states have passed some type of law affecting naloxone availability, only laws allowing direct dispensing by pharmacists appear to be useful. Communities in which access to naloxone is improved should prepare for increases in nonfatal overdoses and link these individuals to effective treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31058922      PMCID: PMC6503576          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  20 in total

1.  Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999-2016.

Authors:  Holly Hedegaard; Margaret Warner; Arialdi M Miniño
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2017-12

2.  Preventing opiate overdose deaths: examining objections to take-home naloxone.

Authors:  Alexander R Bazazi; Nickolas D Zaller; Jeannia J Fu; Josiah D Rich
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-11

3.  Do medical marijuana laws reduce addictions and deaths related to pain killers?

Authors:  David Powell; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula; Mireille Jacobson
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Avoiding globalisation of the prescription opioid epidemic.

Authors:  Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  State legal innovations to encourage naloxone dispensing.

Authors:  Corey Davis; Derek Carr
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2017-01-07

Review 7.  Prescription drug overdoses: a review.

Authors:  Leonard J Paulozzi
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2012-08-25

8.  Opioid-overdose laws association with opioid use and overdose mortality.

Authors:  Chandler McClellan; Barrot H Lambdin; Mir M Ali; Ryan Mutter; Corey S Davis; Eliza Wheeler; Michael Pemberton; Alex H Kral
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Opioid Overdose Prevention Programs Providing Naloxone to Laypersons - United States, 2014.

Authors:  Eliza Wheeler; T Stephen Jones; Michael K Gilbert; Peter J Davidson
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1999-2012: a statistical adjustment analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J Ruhm
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2016-01-15
View more
  49 in total

1.  Opioid-Related Education Provided by Continuing Education Divisions at US Pharmacy Schools.

Authors:  Mandy L Renfro; Leticia R Moczygemba; Jennifer Baumgartner; Glen Baumgart; Lucas G Hill
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Association between state Medicaid expansion status and naloxone prescription dispensing.

Authors:  Minji Sohn; Jeffery C Talbert; Chris Delcher; Emily R Hankosky; Michelle R Lofwall; Patricia R Freeman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Mitigating opioids' harm.

Authors:  Cassandra Willyard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Patient, prescriber, and Community factors associated with filled naloxone prescriptions among patients receiving buprenorphine 2017-18.

Authors:  Bradley D Stein; Christopher M Jones; Rosanna Smart; Flora Sheng; Mark Sorbero
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Legal requirements and recommendations to prescribe naloxone.

Authors:  Rebecca L Haffajee; Samantha Cherney; Rosanna Smart
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  An Observational Study of Retail Pharmacy Naloxone Prescriptions: Differences Across Provider Specialties and Patient Populations.

Authors:  Rosanna Smart; Caroline K Geiger; Christopher M Jones; Bradley D Stein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  A Rapid Review of the Impact of Systems-Level Policies and Interventions on Population-Level Outcomes Related to the Opioid Epidemic, United States and Canada, 2014-2018.

Authors:  Bahareh Ansari; Katherine M Tote; Eli S Rosenberg; Erika G Martin
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Laws Mandating Coprescription of Naloxone and Their Impact on Naloxone Prescription in Five US States, 2014-2018.

Authors:  Traci C Green; Corey Davis; Ziming Xuan; Alexander Y Walley; Jeffrey Bratberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  School nurse reported supply and administration of naloxone in schools.

Authors:  Catherine C McDonald; Jennifer Pinto-Martin; Peggy Compton; Madeleine Parikh; Zachary F Meisel
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 1.462

10.  Is Cannabis being used as a substitute for non-medical opioids by adults with problem substance use in the United States? A within-person analysis.

Authors:  Lauren R Gorfinkel; Malki Stohl; Eliana Greenstein; Efrat Aharonovich; Mark Olfson; Deborah Hasin
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.