Nandita Krishnan1, Lorien C Abroms1,2, Carla J Berg1,2. 1. Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA. 2. George Washington Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Identifying predictors of electronic nicotine product (ENP) cessation can inform ENP cessation interventions. High rates of cooccurring ENP and cigarette (dual) use and transitions between these products underscore the importance of considering cigarette smoking status when assessing and addressing ENP cessation. AIMS AND METHODS: We analyzed waves 3 (W3) and 4 (W4) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study to identify (1) W3 socio-demographics, tobacco and ENP use characteristics, and psychosocial correlates of W3 cigarette smoking status (non-smoker, former, and current) among W3 adult ENP users, and (2) W3 predictors of W4 combined ENP and cigarette smoking abstinence relative to use of one or both products. RESULTS: At W3, 65.6% of ENP users concurrently smoked cigarettes. Adjusted multinomial regression results indicated that different W3 socio-demographics, tobacco and ENP use characteristics, and psychosocial correlates were significantly associated with distinct W3 cigarette use profiles. At W4, 9.9% of individuals were abstinent from both products. These individuals were less likely to: (1) be current smokers (vs. non-smokers) or be advised to quit using tobacco, compared with cigarette only or dual users, and (2) use ENPs daily or live in a household allowing ENP use, compared with ENP only or dual users (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: ENP cessation approaches need to be tailored to the distinct cigarette use profiles of ENP users. Dual users and daily ENP users may require more intensive interventions to achieve the cessation of both products. Supportive physical environments, such as home vape-free policies, may facilitate ENP cessation. IMPLICATIONS: This analysis contributes to advancing the nascent literature on predictors of electronic nicotine product (ENP) cessation, which can guide the development of ENP cessation interventions by indicating which populations, psychosocial and environmental constructs, and cooccurring behaviors interventions should target. This research also highlights the importance of considering cigarette smoking status when designing ENP cessation interventions and defining intervention outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Identifying predictors of electronic nicotine product (ENP) cessation can inform ENP cessation interventions. High rates of cooccurring ENP and cigarette (dual) use and transitions between these products underscore the importance of considering cigarette smoking status when assessing and addressing ENP cessation. AIMS AND METHODS: We analyzed waves 3 (W3) and 4 (W4) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study to identify (1) W3 socio-demographics, tobacco and ENP use characteristics, and psychosocial correlates of W3 cigarette smoking status (non-smoker, former, and current) among W3 adult ENP users, and (2) W3 predictors of W4 combined ENP and cigarette smoking abstinence relative to use of one or both products. RESULTS: At W3, 65.6% of ENP users concurrently smoked cigarettes. Adjusted multinomial regression results indicated that different W3 socio-demographics, tobacco and ENP use characteristics, and psychosocial correlates were significantly associated with distinct W3 cigarette use profiles. At W4, 9.9% of individuals were abstinent from both products. These individuals were less likely to: (1) be current smokers (vs. non-smokers) or be advised to quit using tobacco, compared with cigarette only or dual users, and (2) use ENPs daily or live in a household allowing ENP use, compared with ENP only or dual users (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: ENP cessation approaches need to be tailored to the distinct cigarette use profiles of ENP users. Dual users and daily ENP users may require more intensive interventions to achieve the cessation of both products. Supportive physical environments, such as home vape-free policies, may facilitate ENP cessation. IMPLICATIONS: This analysis contributes to advancing the nascent literature on predictors of electronic nicotine product (ENP) cessation, which can guide the development of ENP cessation interventions by indicating which populations, psychosocial and environmental constructs, and cooccurring behaviors interventions should target. This research also highlights the importance of considering cigarette smoking status when designing ENP cessation interventions and defining intervention outcomes.
Authors: Blair Coleman; Brian Rostron; Sarah E Johnson; Alexander Persoskie; Jennifer Pearson; Cassandra Stanton; Kelvin Choi; Gabriella Anic; Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Kenneth Michael Cummings; Karin A Kasza; Marushka L Silveira; Cristine Delnevo; Raymond Niaura; David B Abrams; Heather L Kimmel; Nicolette Borek; Wilson M Compton; Andrew Hyland Journal: Tob Control Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Christy Kollath-Cattano; Tyler Dorman; Andrew W Albano; Meenu Jindal; Scott M Strayer; James F Thrasher Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Lois Biener; Eunyoung Song; Erin L Sutfin; John Spangler; Mark Wolfson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Rana M Jaber; Mohammadhassan Mirbolouk; Andrew P DeFilippis; Wasim Maziak; Rachel Keith; Thomas Payne; Andrew Stokes; Emelia Benjamin; Aruni Bhatnagar; Ron Blankstein; Anshul Saxena; Michael J Blaha; Khurram Nasir Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-07-14 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Jonathan Foulds; Caroline O Cobb; Miao-Shan Yen; Susan Veldheer; Phoebe Brosnan; Jessica Yingst; Shari Hrabovsky; Alexa A Lopez; Sophia I Allen; Christopher Bullen; Xi Wang; Chris Sciamanna; Erin Hammett; Breianna L Hummer; Courtney Lester; John P Richie; Nadia Chowdhury; Jacob T Graham; Le Kang; Shumei Sun; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 5.825