Literature DB >> 19491091

Origin and use of the 100 cigarette criterion in tobacco surveys.

S J Bondy1, J C Victor, L M Diemert.   

Abstract

Truly global standards and definitions will likely never exist for tobacco control surveillance. One difference across definitions of smoking status is whether or not a lifetime consumption of 100 cigarettes is a necessary criterion for ever and current smoking. Frequently asked questions about this measure demonstrate a need for information on its development and appropriateness in different settings. This commentary attempts to assemble information on the origin and adoption of this measure and provide some critical commentary on its usefulness. The question has been traced to Canadian and American mortality cohort studies from the mid-1950s. From there it has spread to inconsistent use in many settings. To our knowledge, it was not originally (or since) empirically defined as a threshold of exposure related to health consequences or future smoking risk when used in youth. Anecdotal evidence over several decades, however, shows the question has pragmatic utility in self-report data collection. It is a useful, if somewhat arbitrary, screener for "never regular" tobacco use among adults, where never smoking needs to be defined in data collection. Use of the criterion may lower prevalence estimates somewhat. Definitions must always be considered when creating time-trends or international comparisons. There are also circumstances where it is inappropriate to exclude individuals who do not meet this criterion from further data collection, or reports. For research in youth, the criterion typically should be used only with more detailed information about experimentation, but it may be a useful additional indicator of established smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19491091     DOI: 10.1136/tc.2008.027276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  55 in total

1.  Prevalence of smoking among the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual, transgender and queer (LGBTTQ) subpopulations in Toronto--the Toronto Rainbow Tobacco Survey (TRTS).

Authors:  Michele P Clarke; J Robert Coughlin
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr

2.  Electronic cigarette and tobacco use in individuals entering methadone or buprenorphine treatment.

Authors:  Stephen R Baldassarri; David A Fiellin; Mary Ellen Savage; Lynn M Madden; Mark Beitel; Lara K Dhingra; Lisa Fucito; Deepa Camenga; Pooja Bollampally; Declan T Barry
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  The nicotine dependence phenotype, time to first cigarette, and larynx cancer risk.

Authors:  Joshua E Muscat; Hsiao-Pin Liu; Craig Livelsberger; John P Richie; Steven D Stellman
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Concerns about unintended negative consequences of informing the public about multifactorial risks may be premature for young adult smokers.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Caroline Kincaid; Annette R Kaufman; Michelle L Stock; Laurel M Peterson; Nicole L Muscanell; Rosanna E Guadagno
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-01

5.  A longitudinal study of electronic cigarette use among a population-based sample of adult smokers: association with smoking cessation and motivation to quit.

Authors:  Lois Biener; J Lee Hargraves
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Smokers' support for tobacco endgame measures in Canada: findings from the 2016 International Tobacco Control Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Authors:  Janet Chung-Hall; Geoffrey T Fong; Pete Driezen; Lorraine Craig
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-09-28

7.  Cigarette cues capture attention of smokers and never-smokers, but for different reasons.

Authors:  Menton M Deweese; Maurizio Codispoti; Jason D Robinson; Paul M Cinciripini; Francesco Versace
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Cigarette smoking and pulmonary function in adult survivors of childhood cancer exposed to pulmonary-toxic therapy: results from the St. Jude lifetime cohort study.

Authors:  S Cristina Oancea; James G Gurney; Kirsten K Ness; Rohit P Ojha; Vida L Tyc; James L Klosky; DeoKumar Srivastava; Dennis C Stokes; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Daniel M Green
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and lung cancer risk in never-smoking postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Ting-Yuan David Cheng; Xiaoling Song; Shirley A A Beresford; Gloria Y F Ho; Karen C Johnson; Mridul Datta; Rowan T Chlebowski; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Lihong Qi; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Predicting Scheduling and Attending for an Oral Cancer Examination.

Authors:  James A Shepperd; Amber S Emanuel; Jennifer L Howell; Henrietta L Logan
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.