Literature DB >> 34312683

Deep learning-based evaluation of the relationship between mandibular third molar and mandibular canal on CBCT.

Mu-Qing Liu1,2,3,4, Zi-Neng Xu5, Wei-Yu Mao1,2,3,4, Yuan Li1,2,3,4, Xiao-Han Zhang1,2,3,4, Hai-Long Bai5, Peng Ding5, Kai-Yuan Fu6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of our study was to develop and validate a deep learning approach based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for automatic detection of the mandibular third molar (M3) and the mandibular canal (MC) and evaluation of the relationship between them on CBCT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dataset of 254 CBCT scans with annotations by radiologists was used for the training, the validation, and the test. The proposed approach consisted of two modules: (1) detection and pixel-wise segmentation of M3 and MC based on U-Nets; (2) M3-MC relation classification based on ResNet-34. The performances were evaluated with the test set. The classification performance of our approach was compared with two residents in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
RESULTS: For segmentation performance, the M3 had a mean Dice similarity coefficient (mDSC) of 0.9730 and a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 0.9606; the MC had a mDSC of 0.9248 and a mIoU of 0.9003. The classification models achieved a mean sensitivity of 90.2%, a mean specificity of 95.0%, and a mean accuracy of 93.3%, which was on par with the residents.
CONCLUSIONS: Our approach based on CNNs demonstrated an encouraging performance for the automatic detection and evaluation of the M3 and MC on CBCT. Clinical relevance An automated approach based on CNNs for detection and evaluation of M3 and MC on CBCT has been established, which can be utilized to improve diagnostic efficiency and facilitate the precision diagnosis and treatment of M3.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; Convolutional neural networks; Deep learning; Mandibular canal; Mandibular third molar

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34312683     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04082-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  33 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors of neurosensory deficits in lower third molar surgery: an literature review of prospective studies.

Authors:  Y Y Leung; L K Cheung
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study.

Authors:  H Ghaeminia; G J Meijer; A Soehardi; W A Borstlap; J Mulder; O J C Vlijmen; S J Bergé; T J J Maal
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Varun Gulshan; Lily Peng; Marc Coram; Martin C Stumpe; Derek Wu; Arunachalam Narayanaswamy; Subhashini Venugopalan; Kasumi Widner; Tom Madams; Jorge Cuadros; Ramasamy Kim; Rajiv Raman; Philip C Nelson; Jessica L Mega; Dale R Webster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Predoctoral and Postdoctoral Education on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Allison Buchanan; Karan Thachil; Chris Haggard; Sajitha Kalathingal
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.267

5.  Sensory impairment of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  D Gülicher; K L Gerlach
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Which risk factors are associated with neurosensory deficits of inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular third molar extraction?

Authors:  Jin-Woo Kim; In-Ho Cha; Sun-Jong Kim; Myung-Rae Kim
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.

Authors:  H Ghaeminia; G J Meijer; A Soehardi; W A Borstlap; J Mulder; S J Bergé
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Effect of exposed inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle during surgical removal of impacted lower third molars.

Authors:  Andrew Ban Guan Tay; Wee Ser Go
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation.

Authors:  Purv Shashank Patel; Jigna S Shah; Bhavin B Dudhia; Purva Bharat Butala; Yesha V Jani; Roseline S Macwan
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Effectiveness of Semi-Automated and Fully Automatic Segmentation for Inferior Alveolar Canal Localization on CBCT Scans: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julien Issa; Raphael Olszewski; Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  A Fused Deep Learning Architecture for the Detection of the Relationship between the Mandibular Third Molar and the Mandibular Canal.

Authors:  Cansu Buyuk; Nurullah Akkaya; Belde Arsan; Gurkan Unsal; Secil Aksoy; Kaan Orhan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.