Dorien M Eppink1, Henk J Wisselink2, Inge M Krijger3, Joke W B van der Giessen4, Manon Swanenburg5, Coen P A van Wagenberg6, Marcel A P M van Asseldonk6, Martijn Bouwknegt7. 1. Van Hall Larenstein, Velp, The Netherlands. 2. Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands. henk.wisselink@wur.nl. 3. Kennis- en Adviescentrum Dierplagen, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 4. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. 5. Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands. 6. Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 7. Vion Food Group, Boxtel, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The parasite Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is recognized as one of the major foodborne pathogens with a high human disease burden. To control T. gondii infections in pigs, European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) advises serological testing of pigs and audits of pig farms to identify risk factors for T. gondii infection. In line with this approach, the aim of the current study was to assess the effectiveness and costs of intervention measures implemented to reduce the T. gondii seroprevalence on finishing pig farms in the Netherlands. A crossover clinical trial was conducted at five case farms were their own control and the cross-over moment was the implementation of interventions to reduce risk factors. Each of the case farms had a farm-specific intervention strategy with one principal intervention measure (neutering of cats, professional rodent control or covering food storage). RESULTS: All finishing pig farms (n = 5) showed a reduction in T. gondii seroprevalence within one year of implementing the intervention strategy. Cat neutering (n = 3) and feed coverage (n = 1) showed statistically significant reductions in seroprevalence. Rodent control (n = 1) did not show a statistically significant reduction. The estimated reduction in seroprevalence in response to the neutering of cats and feed coverage were 67 and 96 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrates that it is possible to reduce the within-farm T. gondii seroprevalence within one year after interventions were implemented to reduce T. gondii risk factors. This information is essential and encouraging for policy makers, food business operators, and farmers to implement in their risk assessment and to apply to food safety control systems.
BACKGROUND: The parasite Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is recognized as one of the major foodborne pathogens with a high human disease burden. To control T. gondii infections in pigs, European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) advises serological testing of pigs and audits of pig farms to identify risk factors for T. gondii infection. In line with this approach, the aim of the current study was to assess the effectiveness and costs of intervention measures implemented to reduce the T. gondii seroprevalence on finishing pig farms in the Netherlands. A crossover clinical trial was conducted at five case farms were their own control and the cross-over moment was the implementation of interventions to reduce risk factors. Each of the case farms had a farm-specific intervention strategy with one principal intervention measure (neutering of cats, professional rodent control or covering food storage). RESULTS: All finishing pig farms (n = 5) showed a reduction in T. gondii seroprevalence within one year of implementing the intervention strategy. Cat neutering (n = 3) and feed coverage (n = 1) showed statistically significant reductions in seroprevalence. Rodent control (n = 1) did not show a statistically significant reduction. The estimated reduction in seroprevalence in response to the neutering of cats and feed coverage were 67 and 96 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrates that it is possible to reduce the within-farm T. gondii seroprevalence within one year after interventions were implemented to reduce T. gondii risk factors. This information is essential and encouraging for policy makers, food business operators, and farmers to implement in their risk assessment and to apply to food safety control systems.
Authors: Masoud Foroutan; Yadolah Fakhri; Seyed Mohammad Riahi; Soheil Ebrahimpour; Somayeh Namroodi; Ali Taghipour; Adel Spotin; H Ray Gamble; Ali Rostami Journal: Vet Parasitol Date: 2019-04-26 Impact factor: 2.738
Authors: Abbey Olsen; Marianne Sandberg; Hans Houe; Henrik Vedel Nielsen; Matt Denwood; Tina Birk Jensen; Lis Alban Journal: Prev Vet Med Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 2.670
Authors: Arie H Havelaar; Floor van Rosse; Catalin Bucura; Milou A Toetenel; Juanita A Haagsma; Dorota Kurowicka; J Hans A P Heesterbeek; Niko Speybroeck; Merel F M Langelaar; Johanna W B van der Giessen; Roger M Cooke; Marieta A H Braks Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anita W M Suijkerbuijk; Eelco A B Over; Marieke Opsteegh; Huifang Deng; Paul F van Gils; Axel A Bonačić Marinović; Mattijs Lambooij; Johan J Polder; Talitha L Feenstra; Joke W B van der Giessen; G Ardine de Wit; Marie-Josee J Mangen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dorien M Eppink; Martijn Bouwknegt; Joke W B van der Giessen; Manon Swanenburg; Derk Oorburg; Bert A P Urlings; Coen P A van Wagenberg; Marcel A P M van Asseldonk; Henk J Wisselink Journal: Porcine Health Manag Date: 2022-06-14