Literature DB >> 33127169

Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in sows and finishers from conventional and organic herds in Denmark: Implications for potential future serological surveillance.

Abbey Olsen1, Marianne Sandberg2, Hans Houe3, Henrik Vedel Nielsen4, Matt Denwood3, Tina Birk Jensen5, Lis Alban6.   

Abstract

Pigs are one of several host species for Toxoplasma gondii parasites, and consumption of infected pork may lead to toxoplasmosis in humans. We estimated seroprevalence in sows and finishers from conventional and organic herds in Denmark and discussed the strategies for reducing the risk from pork. We collected 447 blood samples from 59 herds, and additional meat-juice samples from 212 of the same pigs. Using a T. gondii IgG commercial ELISA test, we found 2% (95% CI = 0.4%-5%) apparent seroprevalence of T. gondii in conventional finishers, 11% (95% CI = 6%-17%) in organic finishers, 19% (95% CI = 11%-30%) in conventional sows and 60% (95% CI = 47%-72%) in organic sows. The odds of an animal testing positive for T. gondii was 16 times higher (95% CI = 4.6-74.3) in organic compared to conventional herds. The odds were 22 times higher (95% CI = 6.5-88.3) if the animal was a sow compared to a finisher. Meat-juice ELISA values were significantly correlated with plasma results (P < 0.001), but on average 64% of the blood-plasma ELISA values. Lowering the recommended cut-off from 20 to 13 percent positive values of the positive control for meat-juice ELISA, resulted in the meat-juice ELISA identifying 93% of the plasma positives as positive and 99% of the plasma negatives as negative. The time taken to detect one or more infected pigs from a T. gondii positive herd at slaughter was estimated using abattoir data on pigs (17,195,996) and batches (165,569) delivered to Danish abattoirs in 2018. The time to detection was affected by the seroprevalence, frequency at which the pigs were delivered, the number of samples tested per batch delivery and the batch sizes. Time to detection was long in conventional finisher herds due to low prevalence, and in sow herds because of intermittent delivery of a low number of sows. In organic finisher herds, time to detection was short due to medium prevalence and frequent delivery of a high number of finishers. Conventional finisher herds may be classified as low-risk, organic finisher herds as medium-risk, and conventional and organic sow herds as high-risk herds. Risk-mitigation strategies at processing plants (freezing or curing) or at the consumer level (heat treatment) for meat originating from high-risk herds, surveillance of medium-risk herds, and auditing for controlled housing (high biosecurity) in low-risk herds may be cost-effective alternatives to serological surveillance of all Danish pig herds.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional; Meat-juice; Organic; Risk-based surveillance; Seroprevalence; Toxoplasma gondii

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33127169     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  6 in total

1.  Congenital toxoplasmosis: Should we still care about screening?

Authors:  Eskild Petersen; Valeria Meroni; Daniel V Vasconcelos-Santos; Laurent Mandelbrot; Francois Peyron
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2022-05-11

2.  Potential risk factors for the presence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in finishing pigs on conventional farms in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Dorien M Eppink; Martijn Bouwknegt; Joke W B van der Giessen; Manon Swanenburg; Derk Oorburg; Bert A P Urlings; Coen P A van Wagenberg; Marcel A P M van Asseldonk; Henk J Wisselink
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-06-14

3.  Seroprevalence, Direct Detection and Risk Factors for Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Pigs in Serbia, and Influence of Biosecurity Measures.

Authors:  Nikola Betić; Nedjeljko Karabasil; Olgica Djurković-Djaković; Vladimir Ćirković; Branko Bobić; Ivana Branković Lazić; Vesna Djordjević; Ivana Klun
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  Development of a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction tool for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii in meat samples.

Authors:  Andrea Mancusi; Angela Giordano; Antonio Bosco; Santa Girardi; Yolande T R Proroga; Luigi Morena; Renato Pinto; Paolo Sarnelli; Giuseppe Cringoli; Laura Rinaldi; Federico Capuano; Maria Paola Maurelli
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.383

Review 5.  Toxoplasma gondii in Foods: Prevalence, Control, and Safety.

Authors:  Pablo-Jesús Marín-García; Nuria Planas; Lola Llobat
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-22

6.  Effectiveness and costs of interventions to reduce the within-farm Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence on pig farms in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Dorien M Eppink; Henk J Wisselink; Inge M Krijger; Joke W B van der Giessen; Manon Swanenburg; Coen P A van Wagenberg; Marcel A P M van Asseldonk; Martijn Bouwknegt
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-07-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.