Literature DB >> 34307767

Cross-modal effects in speech perception.

Megan Keough1, Donald Derrick2,3, Bryan Gick1,4.   

Abstract

Speech research during recent years has moved progressively away from its traditional focus on audition toward a more multisensory approach. In addition to audition and vision, many somatosenses including proprioception, pressure, vibration and aerotactile sensation are all highly relevant modalities for experiencing and/or conveying speech. In this article, we review both long-standing cross-modal effects stemming from decades of audiovisual speech research as well as new findings related to somatosensory effects. Cross-modal effects in speech perception to date are found to be constrained by temporal congruence and signal relevance, but appear to be unconstrained by spatial congruence. Far from taking place in a one-, two- or even three-dimensional space, the literature reveals that speech occupies a highly multidimensional sensory space. We argue that future research in cross-modal effects should expand to consider each of these modalities both separately and in combination with other modalities in speech.

Keywords:  cross-modal effects; multisensory; somatosensation; speech perception

Year:  2018        PMID: 34307767      PMCID: PMC8297790          DOI: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Linguist        ISSN: 2333-9683


  61 in total

1.  Somatosensory basis of speech production.

Authors:  Stéphanie Tremblay; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effects of blindness on production-perception relationships: Compensation strategies for a lip-tube perturbation of the French [u].

Authors:  Lucie Ménard; Christine Turgeon; Paméla Trudeau-Fisette; Marie Bellavance-Courtemanche
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Proprioceptive ability at the lips and jaw measured using the same psychophysical discrimination task.

Authors:  Ellie Frayne; Susan Coulson; Roger Adams; Glen Croxson; Gordon Waddington
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception.

Authors:  Ingo G Meister; Stephen M Wilson; Choi Deblieck; Allan D Wu; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Somatosensory function in speech perception.

Authors:  Takayuki Ito; Mark Tiede; David J Ostry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: effects of hand position on segmental speech perception.

Authors:  C M Reed; N I Durlach; L D Braida; M C Schultz
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-12

7.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: discrimination ability of untrained observers.

Authors:  C M Reed; S I Rubin; L D Braida; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-12

8.  Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands.

Authors:  Agnès Alsius; Jordi Navarra; Ruth Campbell; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Multisensory integration: space, time and superadditivity.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Charles Spence
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Spatial and temporal factors during processing of audiovisual speech: a PET study.

Authors:  E Macaluso; N George; R Dolan; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pitch-Luminance Crossmodal Correspondence in the Baby Chick: An Investigation on Predisposed and Learned Processes.

Authors:  Maria Loconsole; Andrea Gasparini; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.