Literature DB >> 26860522

Proprioceptive ability at the lips and jaw measured using the same psychophysical discrimination task.

Ellie Frayne1, Susan Coulson2, Roger Adams2, Glen Croxson3, Gordon Waddington4.   

Abstract

In the human face, the muscles and joints that generate movement have different properties. Whereas the jaw is a conventional condyle joint, the facial musculature has neither distinct origin nor insertion points, and the muscles do not contain muscle spindle proprioceptors. This current study aims to compare the proprioceptive ability at the orofacial muscles with that of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in 21 neuro-typical people aged between 18 and 65 years. A novel psychophysical task was devised for use with both structures that involved a fixed 30.5 mm start separation followed by closure onto stimuli of 5, 6, 7, 8 mm diameter. The mean proprioceptive score when using the lips was 0.84 compared to 0.79 at the jaw (p < 0.001), and response error was lower by 0.1 mm. The greater accuracy in discrimination of lip movement is significant because, unlike the muscles controlling the TMJ, the orbicularis oris muscle controlling the lips inserts on to connective tissue and other muscle, and contains no muscle spindles, implying a different more effective, proprioceptive mechanism. Additionally, unlike the lack of correlation previously observed between joints in the upper and lower limbs, at the face the scores from performing the task with the two different structures were significantly correlated (r = 0.5, p = 0.018). These data extend the understanding of proprioception being correlated for the same left and right joints and correlated within the same structure (e.g. ankle dorsiflexion and inversion), to include use-dependant proprioception, with performance in different structures being correlated through extended coordinated use. At the lips and jaw, it is likely that this arises from extensive coordinated use. This informs clinical assessment and suggests a potential for coordinated post-injury training of the lips and jaw, as well as having the potential to predict premorbid function via measurement of the uninjured structure, when monitoring progress and setting clinical rehabilitation goals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facial paralysis; Jaw; Physical therapy; Proprioception; Psychophysics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26860522     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4573-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  65 in total

1.  Darwin, deception, and facial expression.

Authors:  Paul Ekman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Proprioceptive acuity assessment via joint position matching: from basic science to general practice.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06-03

3.  Depth of ankle inversion and discrimination of foot positions.

Authors:  Michael Symes; Gordon Waddington; Roger Adams
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2010-10

4.  Anatomic research on the perioral muscles, functional matrix of the maxillary and mandibular bones.

Authors:  Emanuela D'Andrea; Erik Barbaix
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Assessing proprioceptive function: evaluating joint position matching methods against psychophysical thresholds.

Authors:  Naveen Elangovan; Amanda Herrmann; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-11-21

6.  Proprioceptive target matching asymmetries in left-handed individuals.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Brittany C Noble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Proprioceptive sensibility in the elderly: degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; James P Coxon; Nicole Wenderoth; Annouchka Van Impe; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Illusion caused by vibration of muscle spindles reveals an involvement of muscle spindle inputs in regulating isometric contraction of masseter muscles.

Authors:  Taisuke Tsukiboshi; Hajime Sato; Yuto Tanaka; Mitsuru Saito; Hiroki Toyoda; Toshifumi Morimoto; Kemal Sitki Türker; Yoshinobu Maeda; Youngnam Kang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Bell's palsy in children.

Authors:  Pratibha Singhi; Vivek Jain
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 10.  How the brainstem controls orofacial behaviors comprised of rhythmic actions.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Moore; David Kleinfeld; Fan Wang
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 13.837

View more
  4 in total

1.  Coupling dynamics in speech gestures: amplitude and rate influences.

Authors:  Pascal H H M van Lieshout
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cross-modal effects in speech perception.

Authors:  Megan Keough; Donald Derrick; Bryan Gick
Journal:  Annu Rev Linguist       Date:  2018-08-01

3.  Sympathetic Nervous System Activity in Preschoolers Who Stutter.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Anne Smith; Sharon L Christ; Christine Weber
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Selective Denervation of the Facial Dermato-Muscular Complex in the Rat: Experimental Model and Anatomical Basis.

Authors:  Vlad Tereshenko; Dominik C Dotzauer; Udo Maierhofer; Christopher Festin; Matthias Luft; Gregor Laengle; Olga Politikou; Holger J Klein; Roland Blumer; Oskar C Aszmann; Konstantin D Bergmeister
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.856

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.