Literature DB >> 12815431

Somatosensory basis of speech production.

Stéphanie Tremblay1, Douglas M Shiller, David J Ostry.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that speech goals are defined acoustically and maintained by auditory feedback is a central idea in speech production research. An alternative proposal is that speech production is organized in terms of control signals that subserve movements and associated vocal-tract configurations. Indeed, the capacity for intelligible speech by deaf speakers suggests that somatosensory inputs related to movement play a role in speech production-but studies that might have documented a somatosensory component have been equivocal. For example, mechanical perturbations that have altered somatosensory feedback have simultaneously altered acoustics. Hence, any adaptation observed under these conditions may have been a consequence of acoustic change. Here we show that somatosensory information on its own is fundamental to the achievement of speech movements. This demonstration involves a dissociation of somatosensory and auditory feedback during speech production. Over time, subjects correct for the effects of a complex mechanical load that alters jaw movements (and hence somatosensory feedback), but which has no measurable or perceptible effect on acoustic output. The findings indicate that the positions of speech articulators and associated somatosensory inputs constitute a goal of speech movements that is wholly separate from the sounds produced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12815431     DOI: 10.1038/nature01710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  104 in total

1.  Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production.

Authors:  Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Nonhomogeneous transfer reveals specificity in speech motor learning.

Authors:  Amélie Rochet-Capellan; Lara Richer; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Computational neuroanatomy of speech production.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Disrupting vagal feedback affects birdsong motor control.

Authors:  Jorge M Méndez; Analía G Dall'asén; Franz Goller
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  fMRI investigation of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during speech.

Authors:  Elisa Golfinopoulos; Jason A Tourville; Jason W Bohland; Satrajit S Ghosh; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Natural error patterns enable transfer of motor learning to novel contexts.

Authors:  Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate.

Authors:  K G Munhall; E N MacDonald; S K Byrne; I Johnsrude
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Report of altered sensation in patients with cleft lip.

Authors:  Greg K Essick; Craig Dorion; Seth Rumley; Lyna Rogers; Michael Young; Carroll-Ann Trotman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2005-03

10.  The Effects of Hyper- and Hypocapnia on Phonatory Laryngeal Airway Resistance in Women.

Authors:  Amanda I Gillespie; William Slivka; Charles W Atwood; Katherine Verdolini Abbott
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.