Literature DB >> 34297415

Low fetal fraction in obese women at first trimester cell-free DNA based prenatal screening is not accompanied by differences in total cell-free DNA.

Raj Shree1, Teodora R Kolarova1, Hayley J MacKinnon1, Jaclynne M Hedge2, Elena Vinopal2, Kimberly K Ma1, Christina M Lockwood3, Suchitra Chandrasekaran1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reasons for first trimester noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) test failure in obese women remain elusive. As dilution from maternal sources may be explanatory, we determined the relationship between obesity, fetal fraction (FF), and total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) using our NIPS platform.
METHODS: We assessed differences in first trimester (≤14 weeks) FF, indeterminate rate, and total cfDNA between obese (n = 518) and normal-weight women (n = 237) after exclusion of confounders (anticoagulation, autoimmunity, aneuploidy) and controlling for covariates.
RESULTS: Fetal fraction was lower, and the indeterminate rate higher, in obese compared to controls (9.2% ± 4.4 vs. 12.5% ± 4.5, p < 0.001 and 8.4 vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001, respectively), but total cfDNA was not different (92.0 vs. 82.1 pg/µl, p = 0.10). For each week, the FF remained lower in obese women (all p < 0.01) but did not increase across the first trimester for either group. Obesity increased the likelihood of indeterminate result (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.5, 14.8; p < 0.001) and maternal body mass index correlated with FF (β -0.27, 95% CI -0.3, -0.22; p < 0.001), but not with total cfDNA (β 0.49, 95% CI -0.55, 1.53; p = 0.3).
CONCLUSIONS: First trimester obese women have persistently low FF and higher indeterminate rates, without differences in total cfDNA, suggesting placental-specific mechanisms versus dilution from maternal sources as a potential etiology.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34297415      PMCID: PMC8484039          DOI: 10.1002/pd.6023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.242


  36 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum: implications for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Y M Lo; M S Tein; T K Lau; C J Haines; T N Leung; P M Poon; J S Wainscoat; P J Johnson; A M Chang; N M Hjelm
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: meta-analysis.

Authors:  M M Gil; R Akolekar; M S Quezada; B Bregant; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.587

3.  A unified approach to risk assessment for fetal aneuploidies.

Authors:  D Wright; A Wright; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Low Fetal Fraction and Birth Weight in Women with Negative First-Trimester Cell-Free DNA Screening.

Authors:  Mark A Clapp; Margaret Berry; Lydia L Shook; Penelope S Roberts; Ilona T Goldfarb; Sarah N Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  The impact of maternal plasma DNA fetal fraction on next generation sequencing tests for common fetal aneuploidies.

Authors:  Jacob A Canick; Glenn E Palomaki; Edward M Kloza; Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian; James E Haddow
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Practice Bulletin No. 163: Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal screening in a high-risk and low-risk cohort.

Authors:  Eugene Pergament; Howard Cuckle; Bernhard Zimmermann; Milena Banjevic; Styrmir Sigurjonsson; Allison Ryan; Megan P Hall; Michael Dodd; Phil Lacroute; Melissa Stosic; Nikhil Chopra; Nathan Hunkapiller; Dennis E Prosen; Sallie McAdoo; Zachary Demko; Asim Siddiqui; Matthew Hill; Matthew Rabinowitz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Autoimmune disorders but not heparin are associated with cell-free fetal DNA test failure.

Authors:  Yohann Dabi; Sarah Guterman; Jacques C Jani; Alexandra Letourneau; Adèle Demain; Pascale Kleinfinger; Laurence Lohmann; Jean-Marc Costa; Alexandra Benachi
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Day-to-day and within-day biological variation of cell-free DNA.

Authors:  Anne Tranberg Madsen; Johanne Andersen Hojbjerg; Boe Sandahl Sorensen; Anne Winther-Larsen
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 8.143

10.  Diurnal stability of cell-free DNA and cell-free RNA in human plasma samples.

Authors:  Josiah T Wagner; Hyun Ji Kim; Katie C Johnson-Camacho; Taylor Kelley; Laura F Newell; Paul T Spellman; Thuy T M Ngo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association of fetal fraction with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy incidence and disease severity.

Authors:  Raj Shree; Teodora R Kolarova; Hayley J MacKinnon; Christina M Lockwood; Suchitra Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2022-05-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.