Literature DB >> 26938574

Practice Bulletin No. 163: Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy.

.   

Abstract

Prenatal genetic screening is designed to assess whether a patient is at increased risk of having a fetus affected by a genetic disorder. In contrast, prenatal genetic diagnostic testing is intended to determine, with as much certainty as possible, whether a specific genetic disorder or condition is present in the fetus. The purpose of prenatal screening for aneuploidy is to provide an assessment of the woman's risk of carrying a fetus with one of the more common fetal aneuploidies. This is in contrast to prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders, in which the fetal chromosomes are evaluated for the presence or absence of abnormalities in chromosome number, deletions, and duplications, or the fetal DNA is evaluated for specific genetic disorders. The wide variety of screening test options, each offering varying levels of information and accuracy, has resulted in the need for complex counseling by the health care provider and complex decision making by the patient. No one screening test is superior to other screening tests in all test characteristics. Each test has relative advantages and disadvantages. It is important that obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care providers be prepared to discuss not only the risk of aneuploidy but also the benefits, risks, and limitations of available screening tests. Screening for aneuploidy should be an informed patient choice, with an underlying foundation of shared decision making that fits the patient's clinical circumstances, values, interests, and goals.The purpose of this Practice Bulletin is to provide current information regarding the available screening test options for fetal aneuploidy and to review their benefits, accuracy, and limitations. For information regarding prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders, refer to Practice Bulletin No. 162, Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Genetic Disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26938574     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  56 in total

1.  The Experience of Genetic Counselors Working with Patients Facing the Decision of Pregnancy Termination after 24 Weeks Gestation.

Authors:  Rachel N A Graziani; Laurie Nemzer; Jennifer Kerns
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Isolated large bilateral choroid plexus cysts associated with trisomy 18.

Authors:  Aparna Sharma; Vatsla Dadhwal; Anubhuti Rana; Jaya Chawla
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-03-01

3.  Structural Chromosomal Rearrangements Require Nucleotide-Level Resolution: Lessons from Next-Generation Sequencing in Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Zehra Ordulu; Tammy Kammin; Harrison Brand; Vamsee Pillalamarri; Claire E Redin; Ryan L Collins; Ian Blumenthal; Carrie Hanscom; Shahrin Pereira; India Bradley; Barbara F Crandall; Pamela Gerrol; Mark A Hayden; Naveed Hussain; Bibi Kanengisser-Pines; Sibel Kantarci; Brynn Levy; Michael J Macera; Fabiola Quintero-Rivera; Erica Spiegel; Blair Stevens; Janet E Ulm; Dorothy Warburton; Louise E Wilkins-Haug; Naomi Yachelevich; James F Gusella; Michael E Talkowski; Cynthia C Morton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Screening for fetal chromosomal and subchromosomal disorders.

Authors:  Sarah Harris; Dallas Reed; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Current survey of early childhood intervention services in infants and young children with sex chromosome aneuploidies.

Authors:  Talia Thompson; Susan Howell; Shanlee Davis; Rebecca Wilson; Jennifer Janusz; Richard Boada; Laura Pyle; Nicole Tartaglia
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.908

6.  Implementing Group Prenatal Counseling for Expanded Noninvasive Screening Options.

Authors:  Betsy L Gammon; Laura Otto; Myra Wick; Kristy Borowski; Megan Allyse
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Early neurodevelopmental and medical profile in children with sex chromosome trisomies: Background for the prospective eXtraordinarY babies study to identify early risk factors and targets for intervention.

Authors:  Nicole Tartaglia; Susan Howell; Shanlee Davis; Karen Kowal; Tanea Tanda; Mariah Brown; Cristina Boada; Amanda Alston; Leah Crawford; Talia Thompson; Sophie van Rijn; Rebecca Wilson; Jennifer Janusz; Judith Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  A Hierarchical Bayes Approach to Modeling Heterogeneity in Discrete Choice Experiments: An Application to Public Preferences for Prenatal Screening.

Authors:  Tima Mohammadi; Wei Zhang; Julie Sou; Sylvie Langlois; Sarah Munro; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Telehealth to provide prenatal genetics services: Feasibility and importance revealed during global pandemic.

Authors:  Neeta L Vora; Emily Hardisty; Elizabeth Coviello; Alison Stuebe
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 10.  Have we done our last amniocentesis? Updates on cell-free DNA for Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Kathryn J Gray; Louise E Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.