Literature DB >> 25315809

A unified approach to risk assessment for fetal aneuploidies.

D Wright1, A Wright, K H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential impact of combining measures from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing with maternal age and first-trimester biomarkers in screening for fetal trisomies.
METHODS: This was a theoretical study using Bayes' theorem to combine the a priori risk for fetal trisomy 21 derived from maternal age with likelihoods from nuchal translucency thickness, serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, serum free β-human chorionic gonadotropin and plasma cfDNA. We adopted a binomial counting model for the cfDNA likelihoods and developed a model to account for errors in estimating fetal fraction.
RESULTS: When Bayes' theorem was used to combine the a priori risk for trisomy 21 derived from the first-trimester combined test with likelihoods from the cfDNA test, and when the true fetal fraction was known, the detection rate increased from 62% at a fetal fraction of 4% to 100% at a fetal fraction of ≥ 9%; the positive likelihood ratio (trisomic/euploid) increased from 620 to 1000 and the negative likelihood ratio (euploid/trisomic) increased from 3 to > 10 000. When the fetal fraction is < 4%, the cfDNA test has traditionally been considered to be a failure, but the cfDNA results can be used to improve the performance of screening by the combined test.
CONCLUSIONS: In contingent policies that use the first-trimester combined test for first-line screening to select the subgroup for cfDNA testing, the data from the latter should be used to update the risk from the former. Individual patient results from cfDNA testing depend crucially on the fetal fraction and the precision of its measurement.
Copyright © 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes' theorem; cell-free DNA; fetal fraction; first-trimester screening; nuchal translucency; serum PAPP-A; serum free β-hCG; trisomy 13; trisomy 18; trisomy 21

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25315809     DOI: 10.1002/uog.14694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  16 in total

1.  The IONA® Test: Development of an Automated Cell-Free DNA-Based Screening Test for Fetal Trisomies 13, 18, and 21 That Employs the Ion Proton Semiconductor Sequencing Platform.

Authors:  Francesco Crea; Matthew Forman; Rachel Hulme; Robert W Old; Dan Ryan; Rosalyn Mazey; Michael D Risley
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.587

2.  Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) Fetal Fraction in Early- and Late-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction.

Authors:  Danila Morano; Stefania Rossi; Cristina Lapucci; Maria Carla Pittalis; Antonio Farina
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  How to perform a sonographic morphological assessment of the fetus at 11-14 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Edward Andrew Springhall; Daniel Lorber Rolnik; Maya Reddy; Sujatha Ganesan; Maria Maxfield; Jayshree Ramkrishna; Simon Meagher; Mark Teoh; Fabricio da Silva Costa
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-08-22

Review 4.  Biomarker development for presymptomatic molecular diagnosis of preeclampsia: feasible, useful or even unnecessary?

Authors:  Sinuhe Hahn; Olav Lapaire; Nandor Gabor Than
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 5.225

5.  Comment on "Noninvasive prenatal screening at low fetal fraction: comparing whole-genome sequencing and single-nucleotide polymorphism methods".

Authors:  Allison Ryan; Kimberly A Martin
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Performance of the neoBona test: a new paired-end massively parallel shotgun sequencing approach for cell-free DNA-based aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  V Cirigliano; E Ordoñez; L Rueda; A Syngelaki; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Enrichment of the fetal fraction in non-invasive prenatal screening reduces maternal background interference.

Authors:  Bo Liang; Hong Li; Quanze He; Haibo Li; Lingyin Kong; Liming Xuan; Yingying Xia; Jingjing Shen; Yan Mao; Yixue Li; Ting Wang; Yi-Lei Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Factors associated with common and atypical chromosome abnormalities after positive combined first-trimester screening in Chinese women: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Annisa Mak; Helena Lee; C F Poon; S L Kwok; Teresa Ma; K Y K Chan; Anita Kan; Mary Tang; K Y Leung
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Low fetal fraction in obese women at first trimester cell-free DNA based prenatal screening is not accompanied by differences in total cell-free DNA.

Authors:  Raj Shree; Teodora R Kolarova; Hayley J MacKinnon; Jaclynne M Hedge; Elena Vinopal; Kimberly K Ma; Christina M Lockwood; Suchitra Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.242

10.  Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non-invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13.

Authors:  A T Papageorghiou; A Khalil; M Forman; R Hulme; R Mazey; H A Mousa; E D Johnstone; A McKelvey; K E Cohen; M Risley; W Denman; B Kelly
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 7.299

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.