Literature DB >> 34296025

The utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring on simple posterior lumbar fusions-analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

Ryan J Austerman1, Suraj Sulhan1, William J Steele1, Saeed S Sadrameli1, Paul J Holman1, Sean M Barber1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated the utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM) including somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), and electromyography (EMG), in decreasing the risk of neurologic injury in spinal deformity procedures. However, there is limited evidence supporting the routine use of IOM in elective posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).
METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was analyzed for the years 2012-2015 to identify patients undergoing elective PLF with (n=22,404) or without (n=111,168) IOM use. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess the impact of IOM on length of stay, total charges, and development of neurologic complications. These analyses controlled for age, gender, race, income percentile, primary expected payer, number of reported comorbidities, hospital teaching status, and hospital size.
RESULTS: The overall use of IOM in elective PLFs was found to have increased from 14.6% in the year 2012 to 19.3% in 2015. The total charge in hospitalization cost for all patients who received IOM increased from $129,384.72 in 2012 to $146,427.79 in 2015. Overall, the total charge of hospitalization was 11% greater in the IOM group when compared to those patients that did not have IOM (P<0.001). IOM did not have a statistically significant impact on the likelihood of developing a neurological complication.
CONCLUSIONS: While there may conceivably be benefits to the use of this technology in complex revision fusions or pathologies, we found no meaningful benefit of its application to single-level index PLF for degenerative spine disease. 2021 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM); National Inpatient Sample (NIS); lumbar spine; posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF); somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34296025      PMCID: PMC8261562          DOI: 10.21037/jss-20-679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  20 in total

1.  A socioeconomic analysis of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: national use, regional variation, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Whitney Sheen James; Anand I Rughani; Travis M Dumont
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 2.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Jong-Hwa Park; Seung-Jae Hyun
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 3.  Intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring: considerations for complex spinal surgery.

Authors:  Anne M Padberg; Earl D Thuet
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  History of the development of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tamaki; Seiji Kubota
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Investigating the utility of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: analysis of over 140,000 cases from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample data set.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Farshad Nassiri; Christopher D Witiw; Alireza Mansouri; Saleh A Almenawer; Leodante da Costa; Michael G Fehlings; Jefferson R Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2019-03-29

Review 6.  Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 15: electrophysiological monitoring and lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Alok Sharan; Michael W Groff; Andrew T Dailey; Zoher Ghogawala; Daniel K Resnick; William C Watters; Praveen V Mummaneni; Tanvir F Choudhri; Jason C Eck; Jeffrey C Wang; Sanjay S Dhall; Michael G Kaiser
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-07

7.  Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee.

Authors:  D Kojo Hamilton; Justin S Smith; Charles A Sansur; Steven D Glassman; Christopher P Ames; Sigurd H Berven; David W Polly; Joseph H Perra; Dennis Raymond Knapp; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Richard E McCarthy; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Validity and reliability of intraoperative monitoring in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a 23-year experience of 3436 surgical cases.

Authors:  Earl D Thuet; Jacquelyn C Winscher; Anne M Padberg; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Matthew B Dobbs; Mario Schootman; Scott J Luhmann
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Intraoperative neuromonitoring in single-level spinal procedures: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis in a national longitudinal database.

Authors:  Tyler Cole; Anand Veeravagu; Michael Zhang; Alexander Li; John K Ratliff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Utilization of intraoperative neuromonitoring throughout the United States over a recent decade: an analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample.

Authors:  Joseph L Laratta; Jamal N Shillingford; Alex Ha; Joseph M Lombardi; Hemant P Reddy; Comron Saifi; Steven C Ludwig; Ronald A Lehman; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.