| Literature DB >> 34295531 |
Nora A Abdalah1, Mona E Fathy1, Manar M Tolba1, Amina M El-Brashy1, Fawzia A Ibrahim1.
Abstract
Green analysis has turned out to be of a great value in all areas, including pharmaceutical analysis. Thus, it is extremely important to consider the environmental influence of each step in developing any analysis technique. The present work illustrates a validated, simple and green spectrofluorimetric method for the analysis of dantrolene sodium (DAN). The developed process is characterized by being of high sensitivity as well as being relatively inexpensive. The suggested technique based on the formation of a highly fluorescent product of DAN via its reduction by the aid of Zn/HCl system. The resulting fluorophore showed a powerful fluorescence at λ em 344 nm after excitation at λ ex 279 nm. Calibration graph revealed a great linear regression (r = 0.9998) within concentration ranging from 0.05 to 2.0 µg ml-1. The suggested method had very low detection and quantification limits of 0.010 and 0.031 µg ml-1, respectively. The applied technique was effectively used in the determination of DAN in its pharmaceutical preparations. The results were compared with those from using the official United States Pharmacopeia (USP) method and they were in a good agreement. Moreover, content uniformity testing of DAN in capsules was performed adopting the investigated technique with satisfying results. The greenness of the suggested technique was confirmed by the three standard assessment tools. Therefore, the developed technique can be used in the routine quality control analysis of DAN with minimum harmful impact on nature or individuals.Entities:
Keywords: content uniformity testing; dantrolene sodium; green analysis; pharmaceutical formulations; reduction; spectrofluorimetry
Year: 2021 PMID: 34295531 PMCID: PMC8278042 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.210562
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Scheme 1Reduction of DAN to RDAN.
Figure 4Fluorescence spectra of DAN and RDAN (1.0 µg ml−1), where a and b are excitation spectra and a′ and b′ are emission spectra.
Analytical performance of the suggested technique and some reported methods.
| method | range | LOD | technique hazard and simplicity |
|---|---|---|---|
| spectrofluorimetry [ | 0.1–4.0 µg ml−1 | not available | It is a combination of extractions, chromatography and the fluorimetry. It is time consuming, as the extraction, evaporation and separation steps are performed in about 70 min or more [ |
| HPLC [ | 1.0–10 µg ml−1 | not available | Similar to the previous method, it involves prolonged extraction and separation steps. |
| HPLC [ | 0.7–2.8 µg ml−1 | 8 ng ml−1 | It is very complicated and includes exhausting time-consuming extraction steps. Furthermore, the usage of many organic solvents has a very harmful effect on the analyst and nature. |
| HPTLC [ | 0.1–1.5 µg band−1 | 0.033 µg band−1 | In terms of greenness, the usage of chloroform and ethyl acetate is not preferable owing to their huge toxicity and harmful effect on both the analyst and the environment. Also, this method is slightly time consuming as the saturation time is about 30 ± 5 min. |
| UPLC [ | 0.5–10 µg ml−1 | not available | This is a complicated technique through the usage of two columns and a photodiode array. The mobile phase contains acetonitrile which is considered one of the toxic solvents. |
| voltammetry [ | 0.1–2.6 µg ml−1 | not available | The used dropping mercury electrode (DME) is poisonous, so care should be taken in its handling. |
| DC and DPa polarographic methods [ | 5 × 105 and 5 × 106 M respectively | not available | Dealing with DME and liquid nitrogen is very dangerous and needs high caution. |
| The proposed method in this research | 0.05–2 µg ml−1 | 0.010 µg ml−1 | Simple technique was employed. No toxic or hazardous solvents were used. This method can be applied in the pharmaceutical preparations and content uniformity testing. The degree of greenness was evaluated using three assessing tools. |
aDC, direct current; DP, differential pulse.
Figure 1Influence of zinc metal dust amount on the formation of fluorophore RDAN (1.0 µg ml−1).
Figure 2Influence of 32% HCl volume on the formation of the fluorophore RDAN (1.0 µg ml−1).
Figure 3Influence of reaction time on the formation and stability of the formed fluorophore RDAN (1.0 µg ml−1).
Figure 5Influence of various organized media on RFI of 1.0 µg ml−1 RDAN.
Figure 6Influence of various buffers pH on RFI of 1.0 µg ml−1 RDAN.
Figure 7Influence of various diluting solvents on RFI of 1.0 µg ml−1 RDAN.
Analytical performance data by the suggested technique.
| parameter | DAN | |
|---|---|---|
| linearity range (µg ml−1) | 0.05–2.0 | |
| intercept ( | 28.255 | |
| slope ( | 488.712 | |
| correlation coefficient ( | 0.9998 | |
| s.d. of residuals (S | 6.153 | |
| s.d. of intercept (S | 1.523 | |
| s.d. of slope (S | 3.215 | |
| percentage relative standard deviation, % RSD | 1.610 | |
| limit of detection, LOD (µg ml−1) | 0.010 | |
| limit of quantitation, LOQ (µg ml−1) | 0.031 | |
| Homoscedacticitya | calculated F | 1.17 |
| tabulated F | 3.17 | |
aSignificance level 95% and degrees of freedom of nine for both numerator and denominator [29].
The results of DAN determination in pure form by the suggested technique and official USP method. N.B. The tabulated t and F values are 2.2 and 19.38, respectively, at p = 0.05 [29].
| parameter | suggested technique | Official USP method [ |
|---|---|---|
| mean | 99.63 | 100.03 |
| ± s.d. | 1.60 | 1.08 |
| 0.40 | ||
| 2.53 |
Precision data for DAN determination by the suggested technique. N.B. Each result is the average of three separate determinations.
| amount taken (µg ml−1) | % found | % RSD | % error |
|---|---|---|---|
| intra-day | |||
| 0.2 | 100.81 ± 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.44 |
| 0.5 | 99.89 ± 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.51 |
| 1.0 | 99.47 ± 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.12 |
| inter-day | |||
| 0.2 | 100.15 ± 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.74 |
| 0.5 | 100.63 ± 1.43 | 1.42 | 0.82 |
| 1.0 | 99.57 ± 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.63 |
Robustness of the suggested technique using DAN (1.0 µg).
| parameter | mean ± s.d. | % RSD |
|---|---|---|
| amount of zinc metal dust, 0.35, 0.40 and 0.45 g | 100.72 ± 1.13 | 1.12 |
| volume of 32% HCl, 0.9, 1.0 and 1.1 ml | 99.81 ± 1.12 | 1.12 |
| reduction reaction time, 18,20 and 22 min | 100.07 ± 1.80 | 1.80 |
Results for the DAN determination in single and co-formulated capsules by the suggested technique and official USP method. N.B. The tabulated t and F values are 2.77 and 19.0, respectively at p = 0.05 [29]. Dantrelax® or Dantrelax compound® capsules containing 25 mg of DAN or 25 mg DAN and 200 mg paracetamol, respectively. The nominal contents of the DAN in Dantrelax® and Dantrelax compound® capsules were found to be 24.98 and 24.97 mg, respectively.
| parameter | pharmaceutical dosage forms | Official USP method [ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dantrelax® capsules | Dantrelax compound® capsules | Dantrelax® capsules | Dantrelax compound® capsules | |
| mean | 99.93 | 99.89 | 100.30 | 100.03 |
| ± s.d. | 1.14 | 1.35 | 1.01 | 0.72 |
| 0.11 | 0.16 | |||
| 1.27 | 3.48 | |||
Results of content uniformity testing of DAN in capsules using the suggested technique.
| parameter | percentage of the label claim |
|---|---|
| Dantrelax® capsules 25 mg of DAN/capsule | |
| mean () | 100.28 |
| % RSD | 1.39 |
| % Error | 0.44 |
| calculated value (AV) | 3.34 |
| Max. allowed AV (L1) [ | 15 |
Results for greenness assessment of the suggested technique by three standard green analytical chemistry metric tools.
Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) parameters for the suggested method.
| categorya | description |
|---|---|
| sample preparation | |
| collection (1) | off-line |
| preservation (2) | none |
| transport (3) | none |
| storage (4) | normal condition |
| type of method: direct or indirect (5) | indirect (simple preparation(filtration)) |
| scale of extraction (6)c | — |
| solvents/reagents used (7) | — |
| additional treatments (8) | — |
| reagent and solvents | |
| amount (9) | <10 ml |
| health hazard (10) | HCl = 3 and Zn = 0) |
| safety hazard (11) | HCl = 0 and 1 Zn = 0 |
| instrumentation | |
| energy (12) | ≤1.0 kWh per sample |
| occupational hazard (13) | hermetic sealing of the analytical process |
| waste (14) | 10 ml |
| waste treatment (15) | no treatment |
| quantificationb | yes |
aThe numbers between parentheses are the numbers in the GAPI pictogram (on the right in table 8).
bThe circle inside the central pentagram represent the quantification property of the method.
cThe pentagram representing items number 6, 7, 8 is not shown in the GAPI pictogram since no sample preparation steps is included in the procedure.