| Literature DB >> 34294762 |
Vichai Senthong1, Songsak Kiatchoosakun1, Chaiyasith Wongvipaporn1, Jutarop Phetcharaburanin2,3, Pyatat Tatsanavivat1, Piyamitr Sritara4, Arintaya Phrommintikul5.
Abstract
Plasma Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), a gut microbiota metabolite from dietary phosphatidylcholine, is mechanistically linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and adverse cardiovascular events. We aimed to examine the relationship between plasma TMAO levels and subclinical myocardial damage using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-T (hs-cTnT). We studied 134 patients for whom TMAO data were available from the Cohort Of patients at a high Risk of Cardiovascular Events-Thailand (CORE-Thailand) registry, including 123 (92%) patients with established atherosclerotic disease and 11 (8%) with multiple risk factors. Plasma TMAO was measured by NMR spectroscopy. In our study cohort (mean age 64 ± 8.9 years; 61% men), median TMAO was 3.81 μM (interquartile range [IQR] 2.89-5.50 μM), and median hs-cTnT was 15.65 ng/L (IQR 10.17-26.67). Older patients and those with diabetic or hypertension were more likely to have higher TMAO levels. Plasma TMAO levels correlated with those of hs-cTnT (r = 0.54; p < 0.0001) and were significantly higher in patients with subclinical myocardial damage (hs-cTnT ≥ 14 ng/L; 4.48 μM vs 2.98 μM p < 0.0001). After adjusting for traditional risk factors, elevated TMAO levels remained independently associated with subclinical myocardial damage (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.58; 95% CI 1.24-2.08; p = 0.0007). This study demonstrated that plasma TMAO was an independent predictor for subclinical myocardial damage in this study population.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34294762 PMCID: PMC8298599 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93803-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics of study participants.
| Variables | Overall (N = 134) | Subclinical myocardial necrosis (SMN) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes N = 77 | No N = 57 | |||
| Age, (year) | 64.05 (8.9) | 63.6 (8.4) | 64.6 (9.5) | 0.53 |
| Male sex, (%) | 82 (61.2) | 56 (72.7) | 26 (45.6) | 0.001 |
| BMI, (kg/m2) | 24.62 (4.19) | 24.85 (4.02) | 24.31 (4.43) | 0.47 |
| Systolic BP, (mm Hg) | 131.49 (19.45) | 132.74 (18.89) | 129.79 (20.22) | 0.39 |
| Diastolic BP, (mm Hg) | 73.1 (9.52) | 73.91 (9.61) | 72.0 (9.36) | 0.25 |
| Heart rate (beat per min) | 73.6 (12.97) | 74.16 (13.8) | 72.82 (11.82) | 0.56 |
| Coronary Artery Disease (%) | 123 (91.8) | 71 (92.2) | 52 (91.2) | 0.99 |
| History of myocardial infarction (%) | 99 (73.9) | 60 (77.9) | 39 (68.4) | 0.22 |
| Percutaneous coronary intervention (%) | 100 (74.6) | 61 (79.2) | 39 (68.4) | 0.16 |
| Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (%) | 4 (3.0) | 2 (2.6) | 2 (3.5) | 0.99 |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 53 (39.6) | 33 (42.9) | 20 (35.1) | 0.36 |
| Hypertension (%) | 67 (50.0) | 38 (49.4) | 29 (50.9) | 0.86 |
| Current smoker status | 8 (6.0) | 5 (6.5) | 3 (5.3) | 0.99 |
| hs-cTnT (ng/L) | 15.65 (10.17–26.67) | 24.4 (17.9–37.2) | 9.05 (6.3–11.5) | < 0.001 |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 53 (39.6) | 75 (97.4) | 56 (98.2) | 0.99 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 72.4 (51.7–88.55) | 73.6 (49.8–88.1) | 69.8 (54.4–88.7) | 0.67 |
| Aspirin or Clopidogrel (%) | 126 (94) | 74 (96.1) | 52 (91.2) | 0.28 |
| ACEI or ARB (%) | 85 (63.4) | 54 (70.1) | 31 (54.4) | 0.06 |
| Statin (%) | 131 (97.8) | 75 (97.4) | 56 (98.2) | 0.99 |
| Beta-blockers (%) | 109 (81.3) | 62 (8.5) | 47 (82.5) | 0.78 |
| TMAO (μM) | 3.81 (2.89–5.50) | 4.48 (3.45–6.14) | 2.98 (2.31–4.23) | < 0.0001 |
| Established CVD | 123 (91.8) | 71 (92.2) | 52 (91.2) | 0.99 |
Values are mean ± SD, %, or median (inter-quartile range).
ACEI angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, ARB angiotensin-receptor blocker, BMI body mass index, BP blood pressure, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, hs-cTnT high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, TMAO trimethylamine N-oxide, CVD cardiovascular disease.
Figure 1Correlation between plasma TMAO levels and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-T.
Figure 2Relationship between plasma TMAO levels and subclinical myocardial damage.
Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression for Prediction of Subclinical Myocardial Damage (hs-cTnT ≥ 14 ng/L).
| Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P value | Adjusted OR* (95% CI) | P value | VIF | |
| TMAO | 1.84 (1.22–1.92) | < 0.0001 | 1.58 (1.24–2.08) | 0.007 | 1.05 |
| Age | 0.99 (0.94–1.04) | 0.67 | 0.99 (0.94–1.04) | 0.67 | 1.48 |
| Male | 3.18 (1.54–6.56) | 0.02 | 3.68 (1.55–7.20) | 0.004 | 1.22 |
| BMI | 1.03 (0.95–1.12) | 0.47 | 0.69 (0.02–10.5) | 0.74 | 1.39 |
| Dyslipidemia | 1.12 (0.47–2.76) | 0.78 | 0.89 (0.36–2.16) | 0.79 | 1.06 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 0.72 (0.36–1.46) | 0.36 | 0.96 (0.38–2.40) | 0.78 | 1.22 |
| Hypertension | 1.01 (0.99–1.03) | 0.39 | 1.27 (0.44–3.71) | 0.66 | 1.09 |
| Smoking | 0.8 (0.83–3.49) | 0.78 | 1.14 (0.19–7.13) | 0.88 | 1.10 |
| Established CVD | 0.54 (0.21–1.36) | 0.19 | 1.45 (0.31–6.74) | 0.63 | 1.08 |
| eGFR | 0.99 (0.98–1.01) | 0.18 | 0.98 (0.96–1.0) | 0.89 | 1.45 |
| Statin | 0.75 (1.32–16.9) | 0.75 | – | – | – |
| ACEI/ARB | 0.4 (0.19–0.83) | 0.014 | 2.03 (0.87–4.87) | 0.10 | 1.01 |
| Antiplatelet | 0.42 (0.09–1.84) | 0.25 | – | – | – |
*Adjusted for age, male, BMI, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, established.
CVD, eGFR and ACEI/ARB use.
TMAO trimethylamine N-oxide, ACEI angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, ARB angiotensin-receptor blocker, BMI body mass index, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, hs-cTnT high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, CVD cardiovascular disease.
Adjusted odds ratios (OR) using variables with P-value < 0.3 based on univariate analysis.
| Subclinical myocardial damage (hs-cTnT ≥ 14 ng/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P value | VIF | |
| TMAO | 1.55 (1.23–2.04) | 0.0007 | 1.01 |
| Age | 0.97 (0.84–1.12) | 0.61 | 1.38 |
| Male | 3.24 (1.40–4.36) | 0.001 | 1.15 |
| eGFR | 0.98 (0.97–1.00) | 0.11 | 1.15 |
| ACEI/ARB | 2.08 (0.93–4.76) | 0.08 | 1.00 |
| Established CVD | 1.40 (0.72–1.48) | 0.74 | 1.06 |
Abbreviations as in Table 2.