Literature DB >> 3429474

The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials.

K A Thomas1, J F Kay, S D Cook, M Jarcho.   

Abstract

A mechanical and histological evaluation of uncoated and hydroxylapatite-coated titanium implant materials was performed. Cylindrical implants of uncoated commercially pure (CP) titanium and hydroxylapatite-coated Ti-6Al-4V alloy were studied using a transcortical model, with implants evaluated after periods of 3, 5, 10, and 32 weeks. All implants had a surface macrotexture consisting of a series of semicircular annular grooves, approximately 750 micron in maximum depth. The attachment characteristics of interface shear stiffness and interface shear strength were determined by mechanical push-out testing. Nondecalcified histologic and microradiographic techniques, with implants in situ, were used to evaluate the response to the implant materials and the presence of the surface macrotexture. Mechanical testing results indicated that the hydroxylapatite-coated implants exhibited significantly greater values of maximum interface shear strength than the uncoated implants after all time periods. Interface shear stiffness was also significantly greater at all time periods for the hydroxylapatite-coated implants as compared to the uncoated implants. Histological evaluation after 3 weeks revealed an osteoid layer covering on all areas coated with the hydroxylapatite material; mineralization of this layer appeared to be complete after 10 weeks. In all cases, longer-term implants demonstrated mineralization of interface bone directly onto the hydroxylapatite coating, and in no case was a fibrous layer observed between the hydroxylapatite coating and the interface bone. Sections from the uncoated CP titanium implants revealed a thin fibrous layer present in nearly all areas. Only isolated regions of direct bone-implant apposition were observed for the uncoated implants. The presence of this fibrous tissue layer, however, apparently did not adversely affect the development of considerable attachment strength. The results from this study indicate that the hydroxylapatite coating can significantly increase the attachment strength of implants which rely upon bone apposition for fixation. In addition, the hydroxylapatite coating provides an osteophilic surface for bone deposition, and allows for a more rapid development of implant-bone attachment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3429474     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820211205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  23 in total

1.  Bioactive nanocrystalline sol-gel hydroxyapatite coatings.

Authors:  C S Chai; B Ben-Nissan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  X-ray diffraction of bone at the interface with hydroxyapatite-coated versus uncoated metal implants.

Authors:  L Savarino; S Stea; D Granchi; M E Donati; M Cervellati; A Moroni; G Paganetto; A Pizzoferrato
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Apatite formation on titanium substrates by electrochemical deposition in metastable calcium phosphate solution.

Authors:  Masakazu Kawashita; Satomi Itoh; Kazunori Miyamoto; Gikan H Takaoka
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Biomimetic whisker-shaped apatite coating of titanium powder.

Authors:  Young Uk Sim; Jong Hee Kim; Tae Young Yang; Seog Young Yoon; Hong Chae Park
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Hydroxylapatite nanoparticles: fabrication methods and medical applications.

Authors:  Masahiro Okada; Tsutomu Furuzono
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 8.090

6.  Preparation and biological evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated nickel-free high-nitrogen stainless steel.

Authors:  Makoto Sasaki; Motoki Inoue; Yasuyuki Katada; Yuuki Nishida; Akiyoshi Taniguchi; Sachiko Hiromoto; Tetsushi Taguchi
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 8.090

7.  Formation of highly adherent nano-porous alumina on Ti-based substrates: a novel bone implant coating.

Authors:  E P Briggs; A R Walpole; P R Wilshaw; M Karlsson; E Pålsgård
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Histologic evaluation and removal torque analysis of nano- and microtreated titanium implants in the dogs.

Authors:  Seok Ahn; Mong-Sook Vang; Hong-So Yang; Sang-Won Park; Hyun-Pil Lim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  An in vivo evaluation of bone response to three implant surfaces using a rabbit intramedullary rod model.

Authors:  Juan C Hermida; Arnie Bergula; Fred Dimaano; Monica Hawkins; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Inter-observer reliability of detecting Dynesys pedicle screw using plain X-rays: a study on 50 post-operative patients.

Authors:  Fras Dakhil-Jerew; H Jadeja; A Cohen; J A N Shepperd
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.