Literature DB >> 3429348

Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils.

A M Brown1.   

Abstract

The oto-acoustic emissions generated in response to two-tone stimulation have been studied in the ear canal sound pressure of three species of rodent: rat (Rattus norvegicus), guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) and Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). The level of acoustic intermodulation distortion evoked by equal-level stimuli at different frequencies can be related to the threshold frequency response curves obtained by other workers for these species using evoked electrical responses or behavioural techniques. Gerbils produce higher levels of distortion below 9 kHz than the rat or guinea pig. This may be due to the greater efficiency of the middle ear at low frequencies. Growth of 2f1-f2 with equal-level, widely-spaced stimuli (f2/f1 = 1.3) can be divided into two regions. The low intensity part of the curve grows with a slope of 1 and saturates above 60 dB SPL. With higher level stimuli, there is rapid growth with a slope of, or approaching 3. Differences in growth rate may distinguish a low-level, saturating response which owes its response characteristics to the activity of hair cells from a high-level response attributable to passive mechanical properties of the cochlea. A broad, low-frequency spread of distortion components is seen as the stimulus frequencies converge. Sharp interruptions in the growth curves of these components may be due to interaction between out-of-phase components of 'low' and 'high' level distortion. The distortion in the gerbil can be distinguished from that of the other two species in a number of details. Structural specialisation of the gerbil cochlea may contribute to these distinctive features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3429348     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(87)90211-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  19 in total

1.  A multifrequency method for determining cochlear efferent activity.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Paul K Foster; Barden B Stagner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-03

2.  Effects of whole body vibration on outer hair cells' hearing response to distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Seyyed-Ali Moussavi-Najarkola; Ali Khavanin; Ramazan Mirzaei; Mojdeh Salehnia; Mehdi Akbari
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparison of compound action potential audiograms with distortion product otoacoustic emissions in experimentally induced hydrops.

Authors:  K C Horner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The efferent-mediated suppression of otoacoustic emissions in awake guinea pigs and its reversible blockage by gentamicin.

Authors:  P Avan; J P Erre; D L da Costa; J M Aran; J Popelár
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Frequency variation in spontaneous sound emissions from guinea pig and human ears.

Authors:  A M Brown; S Woodward; S A Gaskill
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Acoustic distortion products from the cochlea of the blind African mole rat, Cryptomys spec.

Authors:  M Kössl; G Frank; H Burda; M Müller
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): parameter optimization.

Authors:  M D Valero; E G Pasanen; D McFadden; R Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.