| Literature DB >> 34287967 |
Francesco Matteucci1, Mark La Meir2,3, Bart Maesen3,1, Gian-Battista Chierchia2, Carlo De Asmundis2, Sandro Gelsomino2,3,1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To test in vivo a new design prototype for radio frequency (RF) ablation.Entities:
Keywords: atrial Fibrillation; bipolar radiofrequency; radiofrequency ablation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34287967 PMCID: PMC9291168 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ISSN: 0147-8389 Impact factor: 1.912
FIGURE 1The prototype catheter. (A) 1. Handle, 2. Cylindrical connector, 3. Flexible hollow element, 4. Tip. (B) Magnification of the catheter tip. 1. Neodymium magnet, 2. Electrode, 3. Epoxy glue reinforcement casting [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 2Drawing of the technique. 1. The surgeon makes a purse‐string on the posterior wall of the left atrium. 2. The endocardial catheter is introduced inside the chamber, moving the tip to the free wall, 3. The epicardial catheter is approximated to the endocardial one. 4. The magnetic force aligns the catheters, and it locks them [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 3Schematic tissue sample description. (A) The length of the sample (L) was set to 5 mm, the width (W) was set to 18 mm (broad extension to include the lesion), and the thickness (H) resulted in an average of 4.17 mm. (B) Slices (1) produced by cryotome cutting. The thickness of each slice was set at 0.1 mm [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 4(A) Surgical view of the ablated area: 1. Left atrium, 2. Pulmonary veins, 3. Ablated linear lesion. (B) Specimen section was made perpendicular to the length of the lesion. The black arrow depicts the transmurality of the lesion. (C) Endocardial view of ablated area [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 5Sample slicing progression sequence. The pale area present in all the slices visually confirms lesion continuity [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Lesion features
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transmurality | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | – |
| Tissue thickness mm | 4.05 | 4.28 | 4.25 | 4.12 | – |
|
Atot mm2 Indexed mm2/mm |
924.78 228.34 |
949.25 221.78 |
944.25 222.17 |
926.05 224.77 |
.29 .28 |
|
Vtot mm3 Indexed mm3/mm |
92.47 22.83 |
94.92 22.17 |
94.42 22.21 |
92.60 22.47 |
.29 .28 |
| Wendo mm | 6.34 ± 0.25 | 6.54 ± 0.33 | 6.36 ± 0.57 | 6.49 ± 0.96 | .25 |
| Wepi mm | 6.37 ± 0.47 | 6.58 ± 0.32 | 6.35 ± 0.56 | 6.53 ± 0.94 | .15 |
Data are expressed as median ± standard deviation or percentage as appropriate. Abbreviations: Atot Total area, Vtot Total volume,.
Wendo Maximum endocardial lesion width, Wepi Maximum epicardial lesion width.
Inter‐group significance at Post‐Hoc test: Atot animal 1 vs Atot animal 2 = *, Atot animal 1 vs Atot animal 3 = †, Atot animal 1 vs Atot animal 4 = ‡, Atot animal 2 vs Atot animal 3 = §, Atot animal 2 vs Atot animal 4 = ║, Atot animal 3 vs Atot animal 4 = #,.
Vtot animal 1 vs Vtot animal 2 = **, Vtot animal 1 vs animal 3 = ††, Vtot animal 1 vs Vtot animal 4 = ‡‡, Vtot animal 2 vs Vtot animal 3 = §§, Vtot animal 2 vs Vtot animal 4 = ║║, Vtot animal 3 vs Vtot animal 4 = ##,.
Wendo animal 1 vs Wendo animal 2 = ***, Wendo animal 1 vs animal 3 = †††, Wendo animal 1 vs Wendo animal 4 = ‡‡‡, Wendo animal 2 vs Wendo animal 3 = §§§, Wendo animal 2 vs Wendo animal 4 = ║║║, Wendo animal 3 vs Wendo animal 4 = ###,.
Wepi animal 1 vs Wepi animal 2 = ****, Wepi animal 1 vs Wepi animal 3 = ††††, Wepi animal 1 vs Wepi animal 4 = ‡‡‡‡, Wepi animal 2 vs Wepi animal 3 = §§§§, Wepi animal 2 vs Wepi animal 4 = ║║║║, Wepi animal 3 vs Wepi animal 4 = ####.