| Literature DB >> 34284740 |
Lu Chen1, Hao Hu2, Wen Chen1, Qian Wu1, Jiang Zhou1, Huan-Huan Chen3, Xiao-Quan Xu1, Hai-Bin Shi1, Fei-Yun Wu4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dysfunction of lacrimal gland (LG) gains increasing attention in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO), while the underlying pathological change is still not fully established. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI)-based diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in non-invasively detecting microstructural alterations of LG in patients with TAO, as well as in discriminating disease activity.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusion tensor imaging; Lacrimal gland; Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging; Thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34284740 PMCID: PMC8290601 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-021-02044-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Fig. 1Schematic diagrams for measurements of LG on rs-EPI-based DTI. Figure a showed the axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging in a 54-year old male with TAO. Figure b and c showed the corresponding axial color-coded FA and ADC maps, respectively. A polygonal region of interest was manually set on each LG locating the maximum cross-section, with careful avoidance of surrounding tissues. LG: lacrimal gland, rs-EPI-based DTI: readout-segmented echo-planar imaging-based diffusion tensor imaging, TAO: thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy, FA: fractional anisotropy, ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient
Clinical and demographic information of study population
| 46.4±13.4 | 46.5±13.5 | 0.981 | |||
| 47.8±9.9 | 44.9±16.4 | 0.566 | |||
| 12/18 | 6/9 | 1.000 | |||
| 7/8 | 5/10 | 0.456 | |||
| 6.76±7.43 | 6.38±3.60 | 0.300 | |||
| 20.03±16.96 | 16.66±6.25 | 0.950 | |||
| 1.230±1.872 | 2.018±2.204 | 0.530 | |||
| 4.50±3.49 | 3.91±8.09 | 0.005 | |||
| 8 | 6 | 0.464 | |||
| 4.6±0.8 | 1.3±0.8 | <0.001 | |||
aP Comparisons between TAO and HC
bP Comparisons between active phase and inactive phase
TAO thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy, HC healthy control, M male, F female, CAS clinical activity score
rs-EPI-based DTI parameters of lacrimal gland between groups
| 0.313±0.067 | 0.375±0.082 | <0.001 | |||
| 0.277±0.040 | 0.349±0.071 | <0.001 | |||
| 1.403±0.276 | 1.289±0.172 | 0.014 | |||
| 1.477±0.342 | 1.329±0.164 | <0.001 | |||
aP Comparisons between TAO and HC
bP Comparisons between active phase and inactive phase
The unit of ADC is ×10-3 mm2/s
rs-EPI-based DTI readout-segmented echo-planar imaging-based diffusion tensor imaging, FA fractional anisotropy, ADC apparent diffusion coefficient
Fig. 2Box-and-whisker plots showing the comparisons of FA and ADC of LG between groups. The unit of ADC is ×10− 3 mm2/s. The asterisk indicates a significant difference (**P < 0.001, *P < 0.05)
Fig. 3Scatter diagrams showing the correlations between FA of LG and serum level of TRAb. The unit of TRAb is IU/L. TRAb: thyrotrophin receptor antibody
Fig. 4Receiver operating characteristic curves of using FA and ADC of LG for grading disease activity