Suraj D Serai1,2, Hansel J Otero3,4, Juan S Calle-Toro3, Jeffrey I Berman3,4, Kassa Darge3,4, Erum A Hartung5,4. 1. Division of Body Imaging, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. serais@email.chop.edu. 2. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. serais@email.chop.edu. 3. Division of Body Imaging, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. 4. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 5. Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the kidneys and its derived parameters in children with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) versus healthy controls. METHODS: In a prospective IRB-approved study, we evaluated the use of DTI to compare kidney parenchyma FA values in healthy controls (age-matched children with no history of renal disease) versus patients with ARPKD. A 20-direction DTI with b-values of b = 0 s/mm2 and b = 400 s/mm2 was used to acquire data in coronal direction using a fat-suppressed spin-echo echo-planar sequence. Diffusion Toolkit and TrackVis were used for analysis and segmentation. TrackVis was used to draw regions of interest (ROIs) covering the entire volume of the renal parenchyma, excluding the collecting system. Fibers were reconstructed using a deterministic fiber tracking algorithm. The FA values based on the ROI data, mean length, and volume of the tracks based on the fiber tracking data were recorded. RESULTS: Eight healthy controls (mean age = 12.9 years ± 4.0; 1/8 males) and six ARPKD participants (mean age = 13.8 years ± 8.5; 5/6 males) were included in the study. Compared to healthy controls, patients with ARPKD had significantly lower FA values (0.33 ± 0.03 vs. 0.25 ± 0.02, p = 0.002) and mean track length (16.73 ± 3.43 vs. 11.61 ± 1.29 mm, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: DTI of the kidneys shows significantly lower FA values and mean track length in children and young adults with ARPKD compared to normal subjects. DTI of the kidney offers a novel approach for characterizing renal disease based on changes in diffusion anisotropy and kidney structure.
OBJECTIVE: To compare diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the kidneys and its derived parameters in children with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) versus healthy controls. METHODS: In a prospective IRB-approved study, we evaluated the use of DTI to compare kidney parenchyma FA values in healthy controls (age-matched children with no history of renal disease) versus patients with ARPKD. A 20-direction DTI with b-values of b = 0 s/mm2 and b = 400 s/mm2 was used to acquire data in coronal direction using a fat-suppressed spin-echo echo-planar sequence. Diffusion Toolkit and TrackVis were used for analysis and segmentation. TrackVis was used to draw regions of interest (ROIs) covering the entire volume of the renal parenchyma, excluding the collecting system. Fibers were reconstructed using a deterministic fiber tracking algorithm. The FA values based on the ROI data, mean length, and volume of the tracks based on the fiber tracking data were recorded. RESULTS: Eight healthy controls (mean age = 12.9 years ± 4.0; 1/8 males) and six ARPKDparticipants (mean age = 13.8 years ± 8.5; 5/6 males) were included in the study. Compared to healthy controls, patients with ARPKD had significantly lower FA values (0.33 ± 0.03 vs. 0.25 ± 0.02, p = 0.002) and mean track length (16.73 ± 3.43 vs. 11.61 ± 1.29 mm, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: DTI of the kidneys shows significantly lower FA values and mean track length in children and young adults with ARPKD compared to normal subjects. DTI of the kidney offers a novel approach for characterizing renal disease based on changes in diffusion anisotropy and kidney structure.
Authors: Alan S L Yu; Chengli Shen; Douglas P Landsittel; Peter C Harris; Vicente E Torres; Michal Mrug; Kyongtae T Bae; Jared J Grantham; Frederic F Rahbari-Oskoui; Michael F Flessner; William M Bennett; Arlene B Chapman Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Hee Kyung Kim; Diana M Lindquist; Suraj D Serai; Yogesh K Mariappan; Lily L Wang; Arnold C Merrow; Kiaran P McGee; Richard L Ehman; Tal Laor Journal: Radiol Clin North Am Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Rupa Radhakrishnan; Aaron M Betts; Marguerite M Care; Suraj Serai; Bin Zhang; Blaise V Jones Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Mike Notohamiprodjo; Christian Glaser; Karin A Herrmann; Olaf Dietrich; Ulrike I Attenberger; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Vicente E Torres; Arlene B Chapman; Olivier Devuyst; Ron T Gansevoort; Ronald D Perrone; Ann Dandurand; John Ouyang; Frank S Czerwiec; Jaime D Blais Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Amanina Ahmad Safri; Che Mohd Nasril Che Mohd Nassir; Ismail Nurul Iman; Nur Hartini Mohd Taib; Anusha Achuthan; Muzaimi Mustapha Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2022-08-26 Impact factor: 1.534