Literature DB >> 25469909

Correlation of gleason scores with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer.

Liang Li1, Daniel J A Margolis2, Ming Deng1, Jie Cai1, Ling Yuan3, Zhaoyan Feng1, Xiangde Min1, Zhiquan Hu4, Daoyu Hu1, Jihong Liu4, Liang Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate tumor aggressiveness in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PCa) by correlating Gleason score (GS) with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 Tesla (T).
METHODS: Eighty-three patients with pathological proven peripheral zone PCa whose GS in at least one core biopsy met the criteria(GS ≤3+3, GS 3+4, GS 4+3, or GS ≥4+4) were included in this study. DTI was performed using b values of 0 and 800 s/mm(2) with 32 directions in all patients on a 3.0T MRI scanner. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated from the DTI data of patients with the previously mentioned four categories of Gleason scores. An association between DTI measurements(FA, ADC) and GS was tested using the Spearman rank correlation analysis.
RESULTS: FA values in the sextants found to harbor cancer were positively correlated with the GS(r = 0.48; P < 0.001), while the ADC values were negatively correlated with GS(r = -0.54; P < 0.001). Statistical significance(P < 0.05) was found for FA values among different GS groups, with the exception of GS 3+4 versus GS 4+3 (P = 0.105). The differences between the ADC values were statistically significant for all four different scores(all P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Quantitative DTI at 3.0T MRI shows a significant association with GS in the evaluation of tumor aggressiveness in peripheral zone PCa, which may be useful to ensure concordance of biopsy results and therefore make the appropriate decision in the management of patients with PCa.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffusion tensor imaging; prostate cancer; quantitative analysis; tumor aggressiveness

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25469909     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  13 in total

1.  Assessment of prostate cancer with integrated CT-perfusion using a sector-wise approach.

Authors:  Matteo Ferrari; Martin Huellner; Chantal Pauli; Burkhardt Seifert; Hansjörg Danuser; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Agostino Mattei
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

Review 2.  Various diffusion magnetic resonance imaging techniques for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Meng-Yue Tang; Xiao-Ming Zhang; Tian-Wu Chen; Xiao-Hua Huang
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-28

3.  Correlation of diffusion tensor imaging parameters and Gleason scores of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Weizhong Tian; Ji Zhang; Fangzheng Tian; Junkang Shen; Tianli Niu; Guohua He; Hong Yu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Diffusion and quantification of diffusion of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiko Ueno; Tsutomu Tamada; Keitaro Sofue; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: associations between diffusion metrics and histological prognostic factors.

Authors:  Jin You Kim; Jin Joo Kim; Suk Kim; Ki Seok Choo; Ahrong Kim; Taewoo Kang; Heesung Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Usefulness of readout-segmented EPI-based diffusion tensor imaging of lacrimal gland for detection and disease staging in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Hao Hu; Wen Chen; Qian Wu; Jiang Zhou; Huan-Huan Chen; Xiao-Quan Xu; Hai-Bin Shi; Fei-Yun Wu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Mapping prostatic microscopic anisotropy using linear and spherical b-tensor encoding: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Markus Nilsson; Greta Eklund; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Mikael Skorpil; Karin Bryskhe; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Claes Lindh; Lennart Blomqvist; Fredrik Jäderling
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.737

8.  Evaluation of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using the Ratio of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Measures.

Authors:  Aslihan Onay; Gokhan Ertas; Metin Vural; Omer Acar; Yesim Saglican; Bilgen Coskun; Sergin Akpek
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Assessing Detection, Discrimination, and Risk of Breast Cancer According to Anisotropy Parameters of Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Authors:  Ruisheng Jiang; Xiangmin Zeng; Shihang Sun; Zhijun Ma; Ximing Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-04-20

10.  Discrimination between clinical significant and insignificant prostate cancer with apparent diffusion coefficient - a systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Hans-Jonas Meyer; Andreas Wienke; Alexey Surov
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.