| Literature DB >> 34281159 |
Agata Pruss1, Paweł Kwiatkowski2, Łukasz Łopusiewicz3, Helena Masiuk4, Peter Sobolewski5, Karol Fijałkowski6, Monika Sienkiewicz7, Adam Smolak8, Stefania Giedrys-Kalemba4, Barbara Dołęgowska1.
Abstract
This study evaluates the electrical potential and chemical alterations in laboratory-induced colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, as compared to the susceptible strain using spectroscopic analyses. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of colistin, ζ-potential and chemical composition analysis ofEntities:
Keywords: FTIR spectroscopy; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Raman spectroscopy; colistin resistance; ζ-potential
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34281159 PMCID: PMC8268070 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22137104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of colistin-susceptible ((A)—K. pneumoniae) and induced high-level colistin-resistance ((B)—K. pneumoniae) K. pneumoniae strains.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of colistin-susceptible (K. pneumoniae) and laboratory-induced high-level colistin-resistant K. pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) strains.
Figure 3FTIR spectra of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) extracted from colistin-susceptible (LPS_) and laboratory-induced high-level colistin-resistant (LPS_) Klebsiella pneumoniae strains.
Figure 4Raman spectra of colistin-susceptible (K. pneumoniae) and laboratory-induced high-level colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) strains.
Figure 5Raman spectra of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) extracted from colistin-susceptible (LPS_) and laboratory-induced high-level colistin-resistant (LPS_) Klebsiella pneumoniae strains.
Dynamic light scattering results of colistin-susceptible (K. pneumoniae) and laboratory-induced high-level colistin-resistant (K. pneumoniae) Klebsiella pneumoniae strains.
| Hydrodynamic Diameter [nm] | Polydispersity Index (PDI) | ζ-Potential | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2340 ± 40 a | 0.23 ± 0.10 a | −13.3 ± 0.5 a |
|
| 2370 ± 40 a | 0.27 ± 0.13 a | −13.1 ± 0.6 a |
The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3–6 measurements; Means with different lowercase letters in the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05.