Federico Guerra1, Ernesto Ammendola2, Matteo Ziacchi3, Vittorio Aspromonte4, Pier Luigi Pellegrino5, Giuseppe Del Giorno6, Gabriele Dell'Era7, Lorenzo Pimpini8, Francesco Santoro9,10, Roberto Floris11, Giulia Stronati12, Gerardo Nigro2, Pasquale Paolisso3, Alessandro Guido13, Giampiero Maglia4, Natale Daniele Brunetti5, Angelo Carbone6, Miriam Gravellone7, Roberto Antonicelli8, Michele Cannone9, Michele Accogli13, Antonio Dello Russo12, Pietro Palmisano13. 1. Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, University Hospital "Umberto I - Lancisi - Salesi,", Ancona, Italy. f.guerra@univpm.it. 2. Cardiology Department, Università Della Campania, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy. 3. Cardiology Department, Università Di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy. 4. Cardiology Unit, "Pugliese-Ciaccio" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy. 5. Department of Cardiology, Policlinico Ospedali Riuniti, Foggia, Italy. 6. Cardiology Unit, "Maria Ss Addolorata" Hospital, Eboli, Italy. 7. Cardiology Unit, "Maggiore Della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy. 8. Cardiology Unit-CCU, Italian National Reserch Centre On Aging, Ancona, Italy. 9. Department of Cardiology, Bonomo Hospital, Andria, Italy. 10. Department of Medical and Surgery Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. 11. Cardiology Unit, "Nostra Signora Di Bonaria" Hospital, San Gavino Monreale, Italy. 12. Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, University Hospital "Umberto I - Lancisi - Salesi,", Ancona, Italy. 13. Cardiology Unit, "Card. G. Panico" Hospital, Tricase, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Sacubitril/valsartan has been associated with a positive reverse left ventricular remodelling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). These patients may also benefit from an ICD implant. We aimed to assess EF improvement after 6 months of treatment with sacubitril/valsartan, evaluating when ICD as primary prevention was no longer indicated. METHODS: Multicentre, observational, prospective study enrolling all consecutive patients with HFrEF and EF ≤ 35% with an ICD as primary prevention and starting treatment with sacubitril/valsartan (NCT03935087). Resynchronization therapy and patients experiencing appropriate ICD therapies before sacubitril/valsartan were excluded. RESULTS: Two-hundred-and-thirty patients were enrolled (73.9% males, mean age 64.3 ± 12.1 years) After 6 months of treatment, a reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes was noted and LVEF increased from 28.3 ± 5.6% to 32.2 ± 6.5% (p < 0.001). At 6 months, a non-ischemic aetiology of cardiomyopathy and a final dose of sacubitril/valsartan > 24/26 mg twice daily were associated with a higher probability of an absolute increase of > 5% in LVEF. A total of 5.3% of primary prevention patients still had an arrhythmic event in the first 6 months after treatment with sacubitril/valsartan started. CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril/valsartan improves systolic function in HFrEF, mainly due to reverse left ventricular remodelling. Improvement in EF after 6 months of treatment could help prevent ICD implantation in nearly one out of four patients, with important clinical and economic implications. However, the risk of sudden cardiac death in this recovered HFrEF population has not been thoroughly studied, and the present data should be interpreted only as hypothesis-generating.
PURPOSE: Sacubitril/valsartan has been associated with a positive reverse left ventricular remodelling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). These patients may also benefit from an ICD implant. We aimed to assess EF improvement after 6 months of treatment with sacubitril/valsartan, evaluating when ICD as primary prevention was no longer indicated. METHODS: Multicentre, observational, prospective study enrolling all consecutive patients with HFrEF and EF ≤ 35% with an ICD as primary prevention and starting treatment with sacubitril/valsartan (NCT03935087). Resynchronization therapy and patients experiencing appropriate ICD therapies before sacubitril/valsartan were excluded. RESULTS: Two-hundred-and-thirty patients were enrolled (73.9% males, mean age 64.3 ± 12.1 years) After 6 months of treatment, a reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes was noted and LVEF increased from 28.3 ± 5.6% to 32.2 ± 6.5% (p < 0.001). At 6 months, a non-ischemic aetiology of cardiomyopathy and a final dose of sacubitril/valsartan > 24/26 mg twice daily were associated with a higher probability of an absolute increase of > 5% in LVEF. A total of 5.3% of primary prevention patients still had an arrhythmic event in the first 6 months after treatment with sacubitril/valsartan started. CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril/valsartan improves systolic function in HFrEF, mainly due to reverse left ventricular remodelling. Improvement in EF after 6 months of treatment could help prevent ICD implantation in nearly one out of four patients, with important clinical and economic implications. However, the risk of sudden cardiac death in this recovered HFrEF population has not been thoroughly studied, and the present data should be interpreted only as hypothesis-generating.
Authors: Silvia G Priori; Carina Blomström-Lundqvist; Andrea Mazzanti; Nico Blom; Martin Borggrefe; John Camm; Perry Mark Elliott; Donna Fitzsimons; Robert Hatala; Gerhard Hindricks; Paulus Kirchhof; Keld Kjeldsen; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Antonio Hernandez-Madrid; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Tone M Norekvål; Christian Spaulding; Dirk J Van Veldhuisen Journal: Europace Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Akshay S Desai; John J V McMurray; Milton Packer; Karl Swedberg; Jean L Rouleau; Fabian Chen; Jianjian Gong; Adel R Rizkala; Abdel Brahimi; Brian Claggett; Peter V Finn; Loren Howard Hartley; Jiankang Liu; Martin Lefkowitz; Victor Shi; Michael R Zile; Scott D Solomon Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: John J V McMurray; Milton Packer; Akshay S Desai; Jianjian Gong; Martin P Lefkowitz; Adel R Rizkala; Jean L Rouleau; Victor C Shi; Scott D Solomon; Karl Swedberg; Michael R Zile Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alvin Chandra; Eldrin F Lewis; Brian L Claggett; Akshay S Desai; Milton Packer; Michael R Zile; Karl Swedberg; Jean L Rouleau; Victor C Shi; Martin P Lefkowitz; Tzvetana Katova; John J V McMurray; Scott D Solomon Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 14.676