Helena Norberg1,2, Ellinor Bergdahl1, Karin Hellström Ängerud3, Krister Lindmark4. 1. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, S-901 87, Umeå, Sweden. 2. Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 3. Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 4. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, S-901 87, Umeå, Sweden. krister.lindmark@umu.se.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a model for systematic introduction and to test the feasibility in a chronic disease population. We also investigated how the approach was received by the patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The systematic introduction approach is a seven-step procedure: step 1, define a few main criteria; step 2, primary scan patients with the one or two main criteria using computerized medical records/databases/clinical registries; step 3, identify patients applying the other predefined criteria; step 4, evaluate if any examinations/laboratory test updates are required; step 5, summon identified patients to the clinic with an information letter; step 6, discuss treatment with the patient and prescribe if appropriate; and step 7, follow up on initiated therapy and evaluate the applied process. The model was tested in a case study during introduction of the new drug sacubitril-valsartan in a heart failure population. In total, 76 out of 1924 patients were identified to be eligible for sacubitril-valsartan and summoned to the clinic to discuss treatment. Patient experiences with the approach were investigated in an interview study with general inductive approach using qualitative content analysis. This resulted in three final categories: a good approach, role of the information letter, and trust in care. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic introduction approach ensures that strict criteria are used in the selection process and that a treatment can be implemented in eligible patients within a specified population with limited resources and time. The model was effective in our case study and maintained the patient's confidence in healthcare.
PURPOSE: To develop a model for systematic introduction and to test the feasibility in a chronic disease population. We also investigated how the approach was received by the patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The systematic introduction approach is a seven-step procedure: step 1, define a few main criteria; step 2, primary scan patients with the one or two main criteria using computerized medical records/databases/clinical registries; step 3, identify patients applying the other predefined criteria; step 4, evaluate if any examinations/laboratory test updates are required; step 5, summon identified patients to the clinic with an information letter; step 6, discuss treatment with the patient and prescribe if appropriate; and step 7, follow up on initiated therapy and evaluate the applied process. The model was tested in a case study during introduction of the new drug sacubitril-valsartan in a heart failure population. In total, 76 out of 1924 patients were identified to be eligible for sacubitril-valsartan and summoned to the clinic to discuss treatment. Patient experiences with the approach were investigated in an interview study with general inductive approach using qualitative content analysis. This resulted in three final categories: a good approach, role of the information letter, and trust in care. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic introduction approach ensures that strict criteria are used in the selection process and that a treatment can be implemented in eligible patients within a specified population with limited resources and time. The model was effective in our case study and maintained the patient's confidence in healthcare.
Authors: Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Monica M Colvin; Mark H Drazner; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Gregg C Fonarow; Michael M Givertz; Steven M Hollenberg; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; Pamela N Peterson; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Cheryl Westlake Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gianluigi Savarese; Juan-Jesus Carrero; Bertram Pitt; Stefan D Anker; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Ulf Dahlström; Lars H Lund Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Nancy Luo; Gregg C Fonarow; Steven J Lippmann; Xiaojuan Mi; Paul A Heidenreich; Clyde W Yancy; Melissa A Greiner; Bradley G Hammill; N Chantelle Hardy; Stuart J Turner; Warren K Laskey; Lesley H Curtis; Adrian F Hernandez; Robert J Mentz; Emily C O'Brien Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Anne Nakano; Kenneth Egstrup; Marie Louise Svendsen; Inge Schjødt; Lars Jakobsen; Frank Mehnert; Søren Paaske Johnsen Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: John J V McMurray; Milton Packer; Akshay S Desai; Jianjian Gong; Martin P Lefkowitz; Adel R Rizkala; Jean L Rouleau; Victor C Shi; Scott D Solomon; Karl Swedberg; Michael R Zile Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Piotr Ponikowski; Adriaan A Voors; Stefan D Anker; Héctor Bueno; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Volkmar Falk; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Ewa A Jankowska; Mariell Jessup; Cecilia Linde; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John T Parissis; Burkert Pieske; Jillian P Riley; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Luis M Ruilope; Frank Ruschitzka; Frans H Rutten; Peter van der Meer Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 29.983