Literature DB >> 28595339

Cardiac resynchronization therapy and electrical storm: results of the OBSERVational registry on long-term outcome of ICD patients (OBSERVO-ICD).

Federico Guerra1, Pietro Palmisano2, Gabriele Dell'Era3, Matteo Ziacchi4, Ernesto Ammendola5, Giulia Pongetti1, Paolo Bonelli1, Francesca Patani1, Chiara Devecchi3, Michele Accogli2, Eraldo Occhetta3, Gerardo Nigro5, Mauro Biffi4, Giuseppe Boriani6, Alessandro Capucci1.   

Abstract

Aims: Electrical storm (ES) is a condition defined as three or more episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) within 24 h, and usually coexist with advanced heart failure in patients with structural heart disease. The aim of the present study is to test whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can be associated with a lower incidence of ES. Methods and results: The OBSERVO-ICD (NCT02735811) is a multicentre, retrospective registry, enrolling all consecutive patients undergoing ICD or CRT-D implantation from 2010 to 2012 in five Italian high-volume arrhythmia centres. Propensity score matching was used to compare two equally sized cohorts of ICD and CRT-D patients with similar characteristics. The primary endpoint was the time free from ES. Secondary endpoints were time free from unclustered VT/VF episodes and time free from ES in CRT-D patients according to clinical or echographic response. CRT-D was associated with a 45% relative risk reduction in ES when compared with ICD (5.6% vs. 12.3%; log rank P = 0.014). CRT-responders presented lower rates of ES when compared with non-responders and negative responders according to both clinical and echographic criteria (log-rank P = 0.017 and 0.023, respectively). No ES was detected in any of the 133 full responders to CRT-D. Clinical and echographic positive responses, but not CRT-implant per se, were associated with lower estimate rates of unclustered VTs/VFs.
Conclusion: Patients with CRT had a lower incidence of ES when compared with propensity-matched ICD patients. The long-term benefit of CRT seems to be due to the improved haemodynamics, as CRT-responders performed markedly better over a long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28595339     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  7 in total

Review 1.  Electrical Storm: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Christos Kontogiannis; Konstantinos Tampakis; Georgios Georgiopoulos; Stefano Bartoletti; Christos Papageorgiou; Hector Anninos; Alkistis Kapelouzou; Michael Spartalis; Ioannis Paraskevaidis; Sofia Chatzidou
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Current Therapeutic Options for Heart Failure in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  F Guerra; M Brambatti; M V Matassini; A Capucci
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Anomalous right coronary artery with interarterial course depicting an unusual case of an electrical storm: a case presentation.

Authors:  Snehasis Pradhan; Kciku Gresa; Hans-Joachim Trappe
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Heart failure treatment in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: Opportunity for improvement.

Authors:  Samaneh Salimian; Marc W Deyell; Jason G Andrade; Santabhanu Chakrabarti; Matthew T Bennett; Andrew D Krahn; Nathaniel M Hawkins
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-12-17

5.  Usefulness of the MAGGIC Score in Predicting the Competing Risk of Non-Sudden Death in Heart Failure Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Sub-Analysis of the OBSERVO-ICD Registry.

Authors:  Marco Canepa; Pietro Palmisano; Gabriele Dell'Era; Matteo Ziacchi; Ernesto Ammendola; Michele Accogli; Eraldo Occhetta; Mauro Biffi; Gerardo Nigro; Pietro Ameri; Giulia Stronati; Italo Porto; Antonio Dello Russo; Federico Guerra
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Comparison of 2-year outcomes between primary and secondary prophylactic use of defibrillators in patients with coronary artery disease: A prospective propensity score-matched analysis from the Nippon Storm Study.

Authors:  Yusuke Kondo; Takashi Noda; Yasunori Sato; Marehiko Ueda; Takashi Nitta; Yoshifusa Aizawa; Tohru Ohe; Takashi Kurita
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-01-07

7.  Effect of SAcubitril/Valsartan on left vEntricular ejection fraction and on the potential indication for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in primary prevention: the SAVE-ICD study.

Authors:  Federico Guerra; Ernesto Ammendola; Matteo Ziacchi; Vittorio Aspromonte; Pier Luigi Pellegrino; Giuseppe Del Giorno; Gabriele Dell'Era; Lorenzo Pimpini; Francesco Santoro; Roberto Floris; Giulia Stronati; Gerardo Nigro; Pasquale Paolisso; Alessandro Guido; Giampiero Maglia; Natale Daniele Brunetti; Angelo Carbone; Miriam Gravellone; Roberto Antonicelli; Michele Cannone; Michele Accogli; Antonio Dello Russo; Pietro Palmisano
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.953

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.