| Literature DB >> 34277546 |
He Zhou1,2, Xiaoli Sun3, Yiding Wang4, Yufeng Ye5, Hanwei Chen5, Qingsong Chen1, Guanhao He2, Jiaqi Wang1,2, Xin Liu2, Moran Dong2,6, Dengzhou Chen1,2, Guimin Chen2,6, Lixia Yuan2,7, Jianpeng Xiao2, Jianxiong Hu2, Weilin Zeng2, Zuhua Rong2, Qianqian Zhang4, Mengya Zhou4, Lingchuan Guo8, Yanyun Lv9, Jingjie Fan10, Yudong Pu11, Wenjun Ma2, Bo Zhang4,6, Tao Liu1,2,12.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have demonstrated the embryotoxicity and fetotoxicity of thallium (Tl). However, the effects of prenatal exposure to Tl on birth weight and placental weight and the mediating role of placental weight in the association of Tl with birth weight remain unclear.Entities:
Keywords: birth cohort study; birth weight; heavy metal; placental weight; thallium
Year: 2021 PMID: 34277546 PMCID: PMC8283527 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.679406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Mediation effect of placental weight on the association of maternal urinary Tl exposure during the first trimester with birth weight. a, c, and c' were estimated for the highest vs. the lowest tertile of ln-Tl exposure, and b was estimated for each unit increase in placental weight. All effect sizes were adjusted for final analyses: maternal age, maternal education, family income, gestational week, parity, gravidity, infant sex, vegetable consumption, fruit consumption. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
Figure 2Mediation effect of placental weight on the association of maternal urinary Tl exposure during the third trimester with birth weight. a, c, and c' were estimated for the highest vs. the lowest tertile of ln-Tl exposure, and b was estimated for each unit increase in placental weight. All effect sizes were adjusted for final analyses: maternal age, maternal education, family income, gestational week, parity, gravidity, infant sex, vegetable consumption, fruit consumption. ***P < 0.001, *P < 0.05.
General characteristics of participants.
| <25 | 73 (2.7) | 3217.1 ± 426.7 | 1.74 | 0.157 |
| 25–29 | 749 (27.3) | 3166.8 ± 393.5 | ||
| 30–34 | 1,060 (38.6) | 3209.9 ± 401.1 | ||
| ≥35 | 866 (31.5) | 3194.2 ± 422.8 | ||
| ≤ 12 | 1,115 (40.6) | 3180.0 ± 417.8 | 1.67 | 0.189 |
| 13-15 | 884 (32.2) | 3192.0 ± 391.7 | ||
| >15 | 749 (27.3) | 3215.0 ± 407.7 | ||
| Housewife | 259 (9.4) | 3184.2 ± 452.2 | 0.57 | 0.682 |
| Unemployed | 204 (7.4) | 3191.5 ± 409.5 | ||
| Technician | 540 (19.7) | 3177.7 ± 387.6 | ||
| Service industry | 1,475 (53.6) | 3195.9 ± 405.1 | ||
| Others | 270 (9.8) | 3221.6 ± 410.0 | ||
| <30 | 110 (4.0) | 3073.6 ± 367.5 | 11.37 | <0.001 |
| 30 | 1,684 (61.3) | 3171.9 ± 411.9 | ||
| 100 | 821 (29.9) | 3234.6 ± 395.7 | ||
| ≥200 | 133 (4.8) | 3310.9 ± 394.9 | ||
| No | 1,868 (68.0) | 3196.7 ± 407.1 | 0.62 | 0.536 |
| Yes | 880 (32.0) | 3186.4 ± 406.6 | ||
| No | 1,788 (65.1) | 3187.6 ± 406.2 | −1.03 | 0.303 |
| Yes | 960 (34.9) | 3204.3 ± 408.1 | ||
| <3.5 | 803 (29.2) | 3183.7 ± 399.9 | 1.81 | 0.165 |
| 3.5 | 1,008 (36.7) | 3182.1 ± 397.8 | ||
| >3.5 | 937(34.1) | 3213.9 ± 421.9 | ||
| No | 2,480 (90.2) | 3191.9 ± 404.8 | −0.61 | 0.541 |
| Yes | 268 (9.8) | 3207.9 ± 426.6 | ||
| <37 | 100 (3.6) | 2549.5 ± 459.2 | 130.23 | <0.001 |
| 37–41 | 2,517 (91.6) | 3206.9 ± 383.7 | ||
| ≥42 | 131 (4.8) | 3426.7 ± 334.0 | ||
| Underweight (<18.5) | 590 (21.5) | 3095.1 ± 365.6 | 26.71 | <0.001 |
| Normal (18.5–23.9) | 1,766 (64.3) | 3212.4 ± 404.9 | ||
| Overweight (≥24) | 392 (14.3) | 3255.9 ± 449.1 | ||
| No | 2,110 (76.8) | 3194.4 ± 401.0 | 0.24 | 0.812 |
| Yes | 638 (23.2) | 3190.1 ± 426.2 | ||
| Male | 1,485 (54.0) | 3241.1 ± 402.8 | 6.72 | <0.001 |
| Female | 1,263 (46.0) | 3137.3 ± 404.7 | ||
| 1 | 956 (34.8) | 3156.6 ± 408.9 | 6.29 | 0.002 |
| 2 | 1,664 (60.6) | 3215.0 ± 405.8 | ||
| >2 | 128 (4.7) | 3187.1 ± 389.3 | ||
| 1 | 749 (27.3) | 3150.7 ± 395.6 | 5.08 | 0.002 |
| 2 | 1,101 (40.1) | 3200.6 ± 410.3 | ||
| 3 | 597 (21.7) | 3204.5 ± 396.5 | ||
| ≥4 | 301 (11.0) | 3251.5 ± 433.3 | ||
| ≤ 14 | 2,011 (73.2) | 3199.9 ± 398.7 | 1.50 | 0.221 |
| >14 | 696 (25.3) | 3177.1 ± 430.9 | ||
| Refused to answer or missing | 41 (1.5) | 3151.2 ± 381.2 | ||
| <7 | 1,060 (38.6) | 3199.2 ± 412.4 | 0.81 | 0.444 |
| 7 | 1,520 (55.3) | 3193.3 ± 403.5 | ||
| >7 | 110 (4.0) | 3147.3 ± 408.8 | ||
| Refused to answer or missing | 58 (2.1) | 3180.2 ± 394.7 | ||
| <7 | 217 (7.9) | 3170.3 ± 416.0 | 0.53 | 0.587 |
| 7 | 2,274 (82.8) | 3195.7 ± 406.8 | ||
| >7 | 207 (7.5) | 3209.4 ± 400.4 | ||
| Refused to answer or missing | 50 (1.8) | 3125.0 ± 400.9 | ||
| <14 | 208 (7.6) | 3195.4 ± 396.6 | 0.02 | 0.981 |
| 14 | 991 (36.1) | 3191.1 ± 399.9 | ||
| >14 | 1,504 (54.7) | 3194.1 ± 412.7 | ||
| Refused to answer or missing | 45 (1.6) | 3213.3 ± 422.0 | ||
BMI, body mass index.
Statistics were estimated by ANOVA.
Statistics were estimated by t-test.
Associations of maternal exposure to Tl during pregnancy with birth weight and placental weight.
| Per IQR (0.72 ng/g creatinine) change | −8.1 (−29.1, 12.8) | −13.1 (−32.7, 6.4) | −3.2 (−5.9, −0.6) | −3.2 (−5.8, −0.5) |
| Tertile 1 (≤ 6.02) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Tertile 2 (6.02–6.48) | −38.4 (−81.0, 4.1) | −30.6 (−70.4, 9.2) | −6.1 (−11.5, −0.8) | −5.5 (−10.9, −0.1) |
| Tertile 3 (≥6.48) | −25.2 (−67.5, 17.0) | −42.7 (−82.3, −3.1) | −7.2 (−13.0, −2.4) | −8.1 (−13.4, −2.8) |
| P for trend | 0.246 | 0.036 | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Per IQR (0.76 ng/g creatinine) change | −29.5 (−51.4, −7.5) | −21.1 (−42.4, 0.1) | −3.3 (−6.3, −0.2) | −2.9 (−6.0, 0.1) |
| Tertile 1 (≤ 5.90) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Tertile 2 (5.90–6.38) | 6.1 (−43.8, 56.0) | 13.0 (−35.5, 61.6) | 0.7 (−6.2, 7.5) | 1.6 (−5.3, 8.5) |
| Tertile 3 (≥6.38) | −60.8 (−110.4, −11.2) | −50.6 (−99.0, −2.3) | −7.7 (−14.6, −0.9) | −7.1 (−14.0, −0.3) |
| P for trend | 0.016 | 0.040 | 0.027 | 0.042 |
CI, confidential interval.
*Adjusted for final analyses: maternal age, maternal education, family income, gestational week, parity, gravidity, infant sex, vegetable consumption, and fruit consumption.
P < 0.01,
P < 0.05.