Literature DB >> 28525492

Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease: Long-term Changes in Sagittal Alignment and Their Clinical Implications After Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage Subsidence: A Prospective Study With Standalone Lordotic Tantalum Cages.

Félix Tomé-Bermejo1, Julián A Morales-Valencia, Javier Moreno-Pérez, Juan Marfil-Pérez, Elena Díaz-Dominguez, Angel R Piñera, Luis Alvarez.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective, observational study of prospectively collected outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term clinical course of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with interbody fusion cages (ACDF-IFC) with lordotic tantalum implants and to correlate the radiologic findings with the clinical outcomes, with special emphasis on the significance and the influence of implant subsidence. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cage subsidence is the most frequently reported complication after ACDF-IFC. However, most reports fail to correlate cage subsidence with lower fusion rates or with unsatisfactory clinical results.
METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients with symptomatic degenerative cervical disk disease with failure of conservative treatment were included. All patients underwent 1-/2-level ACDF-IFC with lordotic tantalum implants. The mean follow-up was 4.91 years.
RESULTS: The final follow-up fusion rate was 96.96% (32/33). The interspace height (IH) at the affected levels was significantly incremented after implant insertion, and despite a gradual loss in the height over time, the final follow-up IH was significantly higher than that measured preoperatively (P<0.0001). Anterior IH and posterior IH lost 55.8% and 76.2% of the initially incremented height, respectively, with a final increase of 72% in the AIH-PIH height differential. Implant subsidence (>3 mm) occurred in 11 disk spaces (26.82%). Preoperative and postoperative IH were significantly higher in subsidence patients; however, there was no difference in the final follow-up IH (P>0.05). Patients with ≥3 years of follow-up (n=29) did not demonstrate further significant subsidence beyond the second year. Regarding C1-C7 lordosis, the segmental Cobb angle, the cervical Visual Analogue Scale, and Neck Disability Index questionnaires, no difference between patients with or without final follow-up endplate subsidence was encountered.
CONCLUSIONS: Until fusion occurs, tantalum cage settlement into the vertebral body is to be expected. Further subsidence could be the result of segmental adaptative changes. Graft subsidence did not affect the clinical outcome in any of our patients during long-term follow-up. The occurrence of dynamical implant subsidence had a positive effect on cervical lordosis, especially at the posterior IH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28525492     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  10 in total

1.  Cervical endplate bone density distribution measured by CT osteoabsorptiometry and direct comparison with mechanical properties of the endplate.

Authors:  Takeshi Hara; Yukoh Ohara; Eiji Abe; Kaosu Takami; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Hajime Arai; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The application of a new type of titanium mesh cage in hybrid anterior decompression and fusion technique for the treatment of continuously three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Xiaowei Liu; Yu Chen; Haisong Yang; Tiefeng Li; Haidong Xu; Bin Xu; Deyu Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cage deviation in the subaxial cervical spine in relation to implant position in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  Klaus Christian Mende; Sven Oliver Eicker; Friedrich Weber
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  A radiographic follow-up study of stand-alone-cage and graft-plate constructs for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Joseph F Baker; Jaime Gomez; Kartik Shenoy; Sarah Kim; Afshin Razi; Yong Kim
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

5.  Differences in Cervical Sagittal Alignment Changes in Patients Undergoing Laminoplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Su Hun Lee; Dong Wuk Son; Jun Seok Lee; Dong Ha Kim; Soon Ki Sung; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2018-03-28

6.  Is correction of segmental kyphosis necessary in single-level anterior cervical fusion surgery? An observational study.

Authors:  Jian Lu; Changjun Sun; Jiangbo Bai; Siyu Tian; Bing Zhang; Dehu Tian; Lingde Kong
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Subsidence following cervical discectomy and implant-to-bone ratio.

Authors:  Bartosz Godlewski; Adam Bebenek; Maciej Dominiak; Grzegorz Karpinski; Piotr Cieslik; Tomasz Pawelczyk
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  Influence of subsidence after stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with degenerative cervical disease: A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Han-Seung Ryu; Moon-Soo Han; Shin-Seok Lee; Bong Ju Moon; Jung-Kil Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  A Lower T1 Slope as a Predictor of Subsidence in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Stand-Alone Cages.

Authors:  Su Hun Lee; Jun Seok Lee; Soon Ki Sung; Dong Wuk Son; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-08-30

10.  Risk factors of cage subsidence after removal of localized heterotopic ossification by anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective multivariable analysis.

Authors:  ShaoQing Li; Hao Zhang; Yong Shen; ZhanYong Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.