Literature DB >> 17712574

Correlation of cervical endplate strength with CT measured subchondral bone density.

Nathaniel R Ordway1, Yen-Mou Lu, Xingkai Zhang, Chin-Chang Cheng, Huang Fang, Amir H Fayyazi.   

Abstract

Cervical interbody device subsidence can result in screw breakage, plate dislodgement, and/or kyphosis. Preoperative bone density measurement may be helpful in predicting the complications associated with anterior cervical surgery. This is especially important when a motion preserving device is implanted given the detrimental effect of subsidence on the postoperative segmental motion following disc replacement. To evaluate the structural properties of the cervical endplate and examine the correlation with CT measured trabecular bone density. Eight fresh human cadaver cervical spines (C2-T1) were CT scanned and the average trabecular bone densities of the vertebral bodies (C3-C7) were measured. Each endplate surface was biomechanically tested for regional yield load and stiffness using an indentation test method. Overall average density of the cervical vertebral body trabecular bone was 270 +/- 74 mg/cm3. There was no significant difference between levels. The yield load and stiffness from the indentation test of the endplate averaged 139 +/- 99 N and 156 +/- 52 N/mm across all cervical levels, endplate surfaces, and regional locations. The posterior aspect of the endplate had significantly higher yield load and stiffness in comparison to the anterior aspect and the lateral aspect had significantly higher yield load in comparison to the midline aspect. There was a significant correlation between the average yield load and stiffness of the cervical endplate and the trabecular bone density on regression analysis. Although there are significant regional variations in the endplate structural properties, the average of the endplate yield loads and stiffnesses correlated with the trabecular bone density. Given the morbidity associated with subsidence of interbody devices, a reliable and predictive method of measuring endplate strength in the cervical spine is required. Bone density measures may be used preoperatively to assist in the prediction of the strength of the vertebral endplate. A threshold density measure has yet to be established where the probability of endplate fracture outweighs the benefit of anterior cervical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17712574      PMCID: PMC2140123          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0482-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  35 in total

1.  The effect of locking fixation screws on the stability of anterior cervical plating.

Authors:  J M Spivak; D Chen; F J Kummer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Estimating the compressive strength of the porcine cervical spine: an examination of the utility of DXA.

Authors:  Robert J Parkinson; Jennifer L Durkin; Jack P Callaghan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support.

Authors:  Thomas G Lowe; Shukor Hashim; Lucas A Wilson; Michael F O'Brien; David A B Smith; Molly J Diekmann; Julie Trommeter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Does the thickness of the vertebral subchondral bone reflect the composition of the intervertebral disc?

Authors:  S Roberts; I W McCall; J Menage; M J Haddaway; S M Eisenstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical analysis of thoracolumbar interbody constructs. How important is the endplate?

Authors:  J P Hollowell; D G Vollmer; C R Wilson; F A Pintar; N Yoganandan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of anterior cervical spine stabilization.

Authors:  M R Grubb; B L Currier; J S Shih; V Bonin; J J Grabowski; E Y Chao
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Multilevel anterior cervical corpectomy and fibular allograft fusion for cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  R L Macdonald; M G Fehlings; C H Tator; A Lozano; J R Fleming; F Gentili; M Bernstein; M C Wallace; R R Tasker
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Prediction of the compressive strength of vertebral bodies of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  M Biggemann; D Hilweg; P Brinckmann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Comparative assessment of bone mineral measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  C A Formica; J W Nieves; F Cosman; P Garrett; R Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Early failure of long segment anterior cervical plate fixation.

Authors:  A R Vaccaro; S P Falatyn; G J Scuderi; F J Eismont; R A McGuire; K Singh; S R Garfin
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1998-10
View more
  13 in total

1.  [Effects of a new anatomical adaptive titanium mesh cage on supportive load at the cervical endplate: a morphological and biomechanical study].

Authors:  Teng Lu; Zhongyang Gao; Xijing He; Jialiang Li; Ning Liu; Hui Liang; Yibin Wang; Zhijing Wen; Ting Zhang; Dong Wang; Haopeng Li
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-04-30

2.  Cervical spine bone density in young healthy adults as a function of sex, vertebral level and anatomic location.

Authors:  William J Anderst; Tyler West; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Association of vertebral endplate microstructure with bone strength in men and women.

Authors:  MeiLissa McKay; Timothy M Jackman; Amira I Hussein; Ali Guermazi; Jingjiang Liu; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Cervical endplate bone density distribution measured by CT osteoabsorptiometry and direct comparison with mechanical properties of the endplate.

Authors:  Takeshi Hara; Yukoh Ohara; Eiji Abe; Kaosu Takami; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Hajime Arai; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Cervical spine bone mineral density as a function of vertebral level and anatomic location.

Authors:  William J Anderst; Eric D Thorhauer; Joon Y Lee; William F Donaldson; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Influence of cervical bone mineral density on cage subsidence in patients following stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Christopher Brenke; Martin Dostal; Johann Scharf; Christel Weiß; Kirsten Schmieder; Martin Barth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Biomechanical comparison of a novel transoral atlantoaxial anchored cage with established fixation technique - a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Bao-cheng Zhang; Hai-bo Liu; Xian-hua Cai; Zhi-hua Wang; Feng Xu; Hui Kang; Ran Ding; Xiao-qing Luo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Effects of Titanium Mesh Cage End Structures on the Compressive Load at the Endplate Interface: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Teng Lu; Hui Liang; Chao Liu; Shuai Guo; Ting Zhang; Baohui Yang; Xijing He
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-06-12

9.  Differences of the Morphology of Subaxial Cervical Spine Endplates between Chinese and White Men and Women.

Authors:  Qi Yao; Peng Yin; Kamran Khan; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Jing-Sheng Li; Yong Hai; Peifu Tang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Titanium Mesh Cages for Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Pathologies: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Zhijing Wen; Teng Lu; Yibin Wang; Hui Liang; Zhengchao Gao; Xijing He
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.