Literature DB >> 34263115

Successful percutaneous treatment of occlusive spontaneous coronary artery dissection with a 'pull-back injection technique': case report.

Leire Unzue1, Maria Jose Romero-Castro2, Eulogio García1, Leire Moreno3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare condition that can cause acute coronary syndrome, typically in young patients without classical cardiovascular risk factors. Although in SCAD the conservative management is preferable, in cases with complete occlusion of the artery an invasive treatment may be required. In such cases, the goal of the percutaneous intervention should be to restore the connection between the true and false lumen recovering the distal flow of the vessel. CASE
SUMMARY: A young man was admitted with acute chest pain and ST segment elevation in precordial v3-v6 leads. An emergent coronary angiogram showed an abrupt occlusion of middle left anterior descending artery compatible with SCAD. A microcatheter was advanced distally into the artery and pulled back with continuous contrast injection through the catheter, restoring the distal flow with a residual spiroid intimal flap and with relief of the chest discomfort. A computed tomography performed during admission showed complete resolution of the lesion. DISCUSSION: In SCAD with complete occlusion of the vessel, the 'pull-back technique' with continuous vigorous injection of contrast through a distal microcatheter may be effective to restore the distal flow enabling the healing of the artery at follow-up and avoiding the stent implant.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case report; Microcatheter; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Pull-back technique; Spontaneous coronary artery dissection

Year:  2021        PMID: 34263115      PMCID: PMC8274651          DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep        ISSN: 2514-2119


Learning points Although in spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) a conservative management is desirable, in cases with complete occlusion of the vessel percutaneous intervention may be required. In such scenario, avoiding stent implant may be preferable. The pull-back injection technique with vigorous injection of contrast through a microcatheter placed in the distal vessel may be useful to restore the connection between false and true lumen recovering the distal flow. Coronary computed tomography is a safe technique to control the evolution of the SCAD, in order to avoid the risk of a second coronary angiogram.

Introduction

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare condition that can cause acute coronary syndrome, typically in young patients without classical cardiovascular risk factors. Although in SCAD the conservative management is preferable, in cases with complete occlusion of the artery an invasive treatment may be desirable. Revascularization in the setting of SCAD remains controversial and technically challenging and is associated with high rates of technical failure, dissection extension, and failure to cross the lesion. Stent implant in this scenario has been associated with malposition, thrombosis, and events in the follow-up. We describe the case of a young patient, presenting with anterior myocardial infarction and SCAD, in whom a novel and non-aggressive technique with continuous injection of contrast at the distal vessel was successfully used to restore the flow, confirming complete restoration of the artery at the follow-up.

Case presentation

A 47-year-old man without any remarkable cardiovascular risk was admitted with acute chest pain and ST segment elevation in precordial v2–v5 leads. His blood pressure at admission was 110/70 mmHg with a heart rate of 82 b.p.m., and he did not present any signs of heart failure. An urgent coronary angiogram was performed through right radial access, showing an abrupt occlusion of middle left anterior descending artery (LAD) (, arrow and Video 1), without distal flow, suggesting a Type 2 SCAD. The other coronary arteries appeared normal (Video 2). A BMW wire was advanced through the occlusion, without restore of distal flow (). A Finecross microcatheter (Terumo, Japan) was then placed in distal LAD and pulled back with continuous contrast injection through the catheter ( and Video 3), restoring the flow with a residual spiroid intimal flap and with relief of the chest discomfort (Supplementary material online, ). High-sensitivity troponin T raised up to 907 ng/L (normal range > 14 ng/L), with a peak creatinine kinase of 871. Echocardiogram showed apical and distal-anterior akinesia, with mild systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction of 45%). Given the complete occlusion of the artery and the low-risk-bleeding of the patient, medical treatment with aspirin 100 mg/day, clopidogrel 75 mg/day, and 80 mg enoxaparin/12 h was maintained during admission performing a 320-sliced coronary computed tomography (CT) (Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan) 1 week after the procedure to control the evolution of the artery in order to avoid the risk of a second coronary angiogram. The CT showed complete resolution of the intimal flap with restore of the distal flow and a residual image at the SCAD entry point (, arrow). Fibromuscular dysplasia was also ruled out during admission with vascular study of iliofemoral, carotid, and intracranial arteries. (A) Abrupt occlusion of left anterior descending artery (arrow). (B) Angioplasty wire advanced into distal vessel. (C) A microcatheter was used to restore the flow, pulling it back while contrast injection. (D) Schematic representation of the technique and final result. (A) Longitudinal view of left anterior descending artery with restore of the flow and a residual image at the spontaneous coronary artery dissection entry point. (B and C) Three-dimensional reconstruction images. Following the recommendations of the European SCAD study that advocate dual antiplatelet therapy during the acute phase the patient was discharged under treatment with 75 mg of clopidogrel, 100 mg of aspirin 100 mg, 20 mg of pantoprazole, and 2.5 mg of bisoprolol with normal systolic function and remains asymptomatic at 4 months of follow-up. Echocardiogram performed 4 weeks after the admission showed no regional wall motion abnormalities with preserved left ventricular function.

Discussion

Although in SCAD the conservative management is preferable, in cases with ST elevation and complete occlusion of the vessel a percutaneous intervention may be required. Luminal obstruction in SCAD is caused by compression of the artery due to a haematoma placed within the vessel media or by dissection of the intima and not by atherosclerotic plaque, therefore the aim of the angioplasty should pursue the restoration of the distal flow by recovering the communication between the false and true lumens. Different strategies have been proposed in this scenario, with a stepwise algorithm that includes plain old balloon angioplasty and cutting balloon dilatation, trying to avoid the stent implantation in these patients. The use of cutting balloon has also been described to fenestrate the intramural haematoma,, however, it should be carefully used in order to avoid the extension of the dissection.

Technique description

After carefully catheterization of the coronary ostium with a guiding catheter, complete unfractionated heparin dose was used (weight-adjusted intravenous bolus of 70–100 UI/KG), advancing a non-hydrophilic angioplasty wire (to avoid as far as possible the entrance into the false lumen) through the occlusive SCAD into the distal vessel (). Afterwards, a stainless steel microcatheter (1.8 Fr diameter) was advanced over the wire to the distal vessel, retrieving the wire to inject a small amount of contrast through the microcatheter to confirm true lumen position (). Subsequently a vigorous injection of contrast (using a 2 mL syringe connected to the microcatheter) was performed, while retrieving the microcatheter to the proximal part of the SCAD ( and Video 3). Although intravascular imaging would have been useful to confirm the diagnosis and to verify the position of the wire in this case, its availability in emergent contexts is limited in our lab. In this scenario, the pull-back technique could have a double advantage, initially confirming the true lumen position of the catheter and enabling the reconnection between the true and false lumen. The goal of the percutaneous intervention in SCAD should pursue the restoring of the distal flow, but not a ‘perfect’ angiographic result without residual stenosis. In this setting, some authors have proposed a change in the definition of ‘success of the intervention’ in the context of SCAD replacing the residual stenosis by a SCAD-specific definition established by improvement of the vessel flow. The presented technique proposes an easy and non-aggressive way to restore the distal flow of the vessel, re-establishing the connection between false and true lumen by vigorous injection of contrast through a microcatheter placed in the distal vessel recovering the flow of the artery and allowing a complete healing during follow-up. Given the possibility of thrombosis despite the restoration of communication between the true and false lumen, it is advisable to confirm the evolution of the SCAD before hospital discharge, preferably with a non-invasive image technique such as a coronary CT angiography.

Conclusion

In SCAD with complete occlusion of the vessel, the ‘pull-back technique’ with continuous vigorous injection of contrast through a distal microcatheter may be effective to restore the distal flow enabling the healing of the artery at follow-up and avoiding the stent implant.

Lead author biography

Dra. Leire Unzue acquired her medical degree in Universidad de Navarra in Pamplona and specialization in cardiology and interventional cardiology at Hospital 12 de Octubre in Madrid. Actually, she is an interventional cardiology working in HM Hospitales and HLA Moncloa in Madrid. Her interests include percutaneous coronary intervention and structural interventional cardiology.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal - Case Reports online. Slide sets: A fully edited slide set detailing this case and suitable for local presentation is available online as Supplementary data. Consent: The authors confirm that written consent for submission and publication of this case report including images and associated text has been obtained from the patient in line with COPE guidance. Conflict of interest: None declared. Funding: None declared. Click here for additional data file.
Day 1Admitted with anterior ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Urgent coronary angiogram demonstrating Type 2 spontaneous coronary artery dissection successfully treated with the pull-back injection technique
Day 2Normal systolic function in echocardiogram
Day 3–5Doppler ultrasound study of abdominal, supra-aortic, renal, and iliofemoral vessels to rule out fibromuscular dysplasia. Rheumatic diseased ruled out
Day 7Discharged from hospital after computed tomography showing complete restoration of left anterior descending artery
Week 4Echocardiogram performed 4 weeks after the admission showed no regional wall motion abnormalities with normal systolic left function
Month 4The patient remains asymptomatic after 4 months of follow-up
  6 in total

Review 1.  Revascularization methods in spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A focused review.

Authors:  Regina Lee; Itsik Ben-Dor
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2017-05-12

2.  Successful treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection with cutting balloon angioplasty as evaluated with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Yumoto; Hojo Sasaki; Hajime Aoki; Kenichi Kato
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: revascularization versus conservative therapy.

Authors:  Marysia S Tweet; Mackram F Eleid; Patricia J M Best; Ryan J Lennon; Amir Lerman; Charanjit S Rihal; David R Holmes; Sharonne N Hayes; Rajiv Gulati
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 6.546

4.  European Society of Cardiology, acute cardiovascular care association, SCAD study group: a position paper on spontaneous coronary artery dissection.

Authors:  David Adlam; Fernando Alfonso; Angela Maas; Christiaan Vrints
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Canadian spontaneous coronary artery dissection cohort study: in-hospital and 30-day outcomes.

Authors:  Jacqueline Saw; Andrew Starovoytov; Karin Humphries; Tej Sheth; Derek So; Kunal Minhas; Neil Brass; Andrea Lavoie; Helen Bishop; Shahar Lavi; Colin Pearce; Suzanne Renner; Mina Madan; Robert C Welsh; Sohrab Lutchmedial; Ram Vijayaraghavan; Eve Aymong; Bryan Har; Reda Ibrahim; Heather L Gornik; Santhi Ganesh; Christopher Buller; Alexis Matteau; Giuseppe Martucci; Dennis Ko; Giovanni Battista John Mancini
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 35.855

6.  Successful treatment of a spontaneous right coronary artery dissection with a 4-mm diameter cutting balloon: a case report.

Authors:  Harish Sharma; Vincenzo Vetrugno; Sohail Q Khan
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2019-11-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.