Marysia S Tweet1, Mackram F Eleid1, Patricia J M Best1, Ryan J Lennon1, Amir Lerman1, Charanjit S Rihal1, David R Holmes1, Sharonne N Hayes1, Rajiv Gulati2. 1. From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases (M.S.T., M.F.E., P.J.M.B., A.L., C.S.R., D.R.H., S.N.H., R.G.) and Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (R.J.L.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 2. From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases (M.S.T., M.F.E., P.J.M.B., A.L., C.S.R., D.R.H., S.N.H., R.G.) and Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (R.J.L.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. gulati.rajiv@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a nonatherosclerotic acute coronary syndrome for which optimal management remains undefined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective study of 189 patients presenting with a first SCAD episode. We evaluated outcomes according to initial management: (1) revascularization versus conservative therapy and (2) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus conservative therapy stratified by vessel flow at presentation. Demographics were similar in revascularization versus conservative (mean age, 44±9 years; women 92% both groups), but vessel occlusion was more frequent in revascularization (44/95 versus 18/94). There was 1 in-hospital death (revascularization) and 1 late death (conservative). Procedural failure rate was 53% in those managed with PCI. In the subgroup of patients presenting with preserved vessel flow, rates of PCI failure were similarly high (50%), and 6 (13%) required emergency coronary artery bypass grafting. In the conservative group, 85 of 94 (90%) had an uneventful in-hospital course, but 9 (10%) experienced early SCAD progression requiring revascularization. Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year rates of target vessel revascularization and recurrent SCAD were no different in revascularization versus conservative therapy (30% versus 19%; P=0.06 and 23% versus 31%; P=0.7). CONCLUSIONS: PCI for SCAD is associated with high rates of technical failure even in those presenting with preserved vessel flow and does not protect against target vessel revascularization or recurrent SCAD. A strategy of conservative management with prolonged observation may be preferable.
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a nonatherosclerotic acute coronary syndrome for which optimal management remains undefined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective study of 189 patients presenting with a first SCAD episode. We evaluated outcomes according to initial management: (1) revascularization versus conservative therapy and (2) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus conservative therapy stratified by vessel flow at presentation. Demographics were similar in revascularization versus conservative (mean age, 44±9 years; women 92% both groups), but vessel occlusion was more frequent in revascularization (44/95 versus 18/94). There was 1 in-hospital death (revascularization) and 1 late death (conservative). Procedural failure rate was 53% in those managed with PCI. In the subgroup of patients presenting with preserved vessel flow, rates of PCI failure were similarly high (50%), and 6 (13%) required emergency coronary artery bypass grafting. In the conservative group, 85 of 94 (90%) had an uneventful in-hospital course, but 9 (10%) experienced early SCAD progression requiring revascularization. Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year rates of target vessel revascularization and recurrent SCAD were no different in revascularization versus conservative therapy (30% versus 19%; P=0.06 and 23% versus 31%; P=0.7). CONCLUSIONS: PCI for SCAD is associated with high rates of technical failure even in those presenting with preserved vessel flow and does not protect against target vessel revascularization or recurrent SCAD. A strategy of conservative management with prolonged observation may be preferable.
Authors: Fernando Alfonso; Teresa Bastante; Javier Cuesta; Daniel Rodríguez; Amparo Benedicto; Fernando Rivero Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2015-04
Authors: Keyvan Karim Galougahi; Ori Ben-Yehuda; Akiko Maehara; Gary S Mintz; Gregg W Stone; Ziad A Ali Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Fernando Alfonso; Marcos García-Guimaraes; Teresa Bastante; Francisco de la Cuerda; Paula Antuña; Javier Cuesta; Fernando Rivero Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.895