Literature DB >> 34256028

New approaches to predict the effect of co-occurring variants on protein characteristics.

David Holcomb1, Nobuko Hamasaki-Katagiri1, Kyle Laurie1, Upendra Katneni1, Jacob Kames1, Aikaterini Alexaki1, Haim Bar2, Chava Kimchi-Sarfaty3.   

Abstract

Predicting the effect of a mutated gene before the onset of symptoms of genetic diseases would greatly facilitate diagnosis and potentiate early intervention. There have been myriad attempts to predict the effects of single-nucleotide variants. However, the applicability of these efforts does not scale to co-occurring variants. Furthermore, an increasing number of protein therapeutics contain co-occurring nucleotide variations, adding uncertainty during development to the safety and efficiency of these drugs. Co-occurring nucleotide variants may often have synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effects on protein attributes, further complicating the task of outcome prediction. We tested four models based on the cooperative and antagonistic effects of co-occurring variants to predict pathogenicity and effectiveness of protein therapeutics. A total of 30 attributes, including amino acid and nucleotide features, as well as existing single-variant effect prediction tools, were considered on the basis of previous studies on single-nucleotide variants. Importantly, the effects of synonymous variants, often seen in protein therapeutics, were also included in our models. We used 12 datasets of people with monogenic diseases and controls with co-occurring genetic variants to evaluate the accuracy of our models, accomplishing a degree of accuracy comparable to that of prediction tools for single-nucleotide variants. More importantly, our framework is generalizable to new, well-curated datasets of monogenic diseases and new variant scoring tools. This approach successfully assists in addressing the challenging task of predicting the effect of co-occurring variants on pathogenicity and protein effectiveness and is applicable for a wide range of protein therapeutics and genetic diseases.
Copyright © 2021 American Society of Human Genetics. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SNV; cooperative and antagonistic effects; datasets of monogenic diseases; effect of co-occurring genetic variants; pathogenicity and protein effectiveness; prediction tool; single nucleotide variant; synonymous variants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34256028      PMCID: PMC8387465          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  30 in total

1.  dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation.

Authors:  S T Sherry; M H Ward; M Kholodov; J Baker; L Phan; E M Smigielski; K Sirotkin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments.

Authors:  David T Jones; Daniel W A Buchan; Domenico Cozzetto; Massimiliano Pontil
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families.

Authors:  Faruck Morcos; Andrea Pagnani; Bryan Lunt; Arianna Bertolino; Debora S Marks; Chris Sander; Riccardo Zecchina; José N Onuchic; Terence Hwa; Martin Weigt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  SIFT missense predictions for genomes.

Authors:  Robert Vaser; Swarnaseetha Adusumalli; Sim Ngak Leng; Mile Sikic; Pauline C Ng
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Compounding variants rescue the effect of a deleterious ADAMTS13 mutation in a child with severe congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Upendra K Katneni; Ryan Hunt; Gaya K Hettiarachchi; Nobuko Hamasaki-Katagiri; Chava Kimchi-Sarfaty; Juan C Ibla
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.944

6.  Predicting venous thromboembolism risk from exomes in the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) challenges.

Authors:  Gregory McInnes; Roxana Daneshjou; Panagiostis Katsonis; Olivier Lichtarge; Rajgopal Srinivasan; Sadhna Rana; Predrag Radivojac; Sean D Mooney; Kymberleigh A Pagel; Moses Stamboulian; Yuxiang Jiang; Emidio Capriotti; Yanran Wang; Yana Bromberg; Samuele Bovo; Castrense Savojardo; Pier Luigi Martelli; Rita Casadio; Lipika R Pal; John Moult; Steven E Brenner; Russ Altman
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 7.  Natural history of Upshaw-Schulman syndrome based on ADAMTS13 gene analysis in Japan.

Authors:  Y Fujimura; M Matsumoto; A Isonishi; H Yagi; K Kokame; K Soejima; M Murata; T Miyata
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.824

8.  Stratified polygenic risk prediction model with application to CAGI bipolar disorder sequencing data.

Authors:  Maggie Haitian Wang; Billy Chang; Rui Sun; Inchi Hu; Xiaoxuan Xia; William Ka Kei Wu; Ka Chun Chong; Benny Chung-Ying Zee
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets.

Authors:  Chris Stark; Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Teresa Reguly; Lorrie Boucher; Ashton Breitkreutz; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Bayesian modeling of haplotype effects in multiparent populations.

Authors:  Zhaojun Zhang; Wei Wang; William Valdar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Insights into Mechanisms of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas Driven by Known or New Genetic Drivers.

Authors:  Shahida K Flores; Cynthia M Estrada-Zuniga; Keerthi Thallapureddy; Gustavo Armaiz-Peña; Patricia L M Dahia
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 6.575

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.