Literature DB >> 31140652

Predicting venous thromboembolism risk from exomes in the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) challenges.

Gregory McInnes1, Roxana Daneshjou2, Panagiostis Katsonis3, Olivier Lichtarge3,4,5,6, Rajgopal Srinivasan7, Sadhna Rana7, Predrag Radivojac8, Sean D Mooney9, Kymberleigh A Pagel10, Moses Stamboulian10, Yuxiang Jiang10, Emidio Capriotti11, Yanran Wang12, Yana Bromberg12, Samuele Bovo13, Castrense Savojardo13, Pier Luigi Martelli13, Rita Casadio13,14, Lipika R Pal15, John Moult15,16, Steven E Brenner17, Russ Altman18.   

Abstract

Genetics play a key role in venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, however established risk factors in European populations do not translate to individuals of African descent because of the differences in allele frequencies between populations. As part of the fifth iteration of the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation, participants were asked to predict VTE status in exome data from African American subjects. Participants were provided with 103 unlabeled exomes from patients treated with warfarin for non-VTE causes or VTE and asked to predict which disease each subject had been treated for. Given the lack of training data, many participants opted to use unsupervised machine learning methods, clustering the exomes by variation in genes known to be associated with VTE. The best performing method using only VTE related genes achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.65. Here, we discuss the range of methods used in the prediction of VTE from sequence data and explore some of the difficulties of conducting a challenge with known confounders. In addition, we show that an existing genetic risk score for VTE that was developed in European subjects works well in African Americans.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exomes; machine learning; phenotype prediction; prediction challenge; venous thromboembolism

Year:  2019        PMID: 31140652      PMCID: PMC7047641          DOI: 10.1002/humu.23825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  4 in total

1.  New approaches to predict the effect of co-occurring variants on protein characteristics.

Authors:  David Holcomb; Nobuko Hamasaki-Katagiri; Kyle Laurie; Upendra Katneni; Jacob Kames; Aikaterini Alexaki; Haim Bar; Chava Kimchi-Sarfaty
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  CAGI5: Objective performance assessments of predictions based on the Evolutionary Action equation.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsonis; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 3.  Genome interpretation using in silico predictors of variant impact.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsonis; Kevin Wilhelm; Amanda Williams; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 5.881

4.  A validated clinical-genetic score for assessing the risk of thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 receiving thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  José Manuel Soria; Sergi Mojal; Angel Martinez-Perez; Francisco René Acosta; Sonia López; Sara Miqueleiz; Diana Rodriguez; Maria Angeles Quijada; Antonio Cardenas; Francisco Vidal; Angel Remacha; Rosa Maria Antonijoan; Juan Carlos Souto
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 11.047

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.