Joseph Schulman1, David Braun2, Henry C Lee3,4,5, Jochen Profit3,4,5, Grace Duenas3,4,5, Mihoko V Bennett3,4,5, Robert J Dimand1, Maria Jocson1, Jeffrey B Gould3,4,5. 1. California Department of Health Care Services, California Children's Services, Sacramento. 2. Kaiser Permanente, Southern California, Panorama City. 3. Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 4. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California. 5. California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Palo Alto.
Abstract
Importance: Most neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are born at gestational age (GA) of 34 weeks or more. The degree of uniformity of admission criteria for these infants is unclear, particularly at the low-acuity end of the range of conditions warranting admission. Objectives: To describe variation in NICU admission rates for neonates born at GA of 34 weeks or more and examine whether such variation is associated with high illness acuity or designated facility level of care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study of 35 921 NICU inborn admissions of GA at 34 weeks or more during calendar year 2015, using a population database of inborn NICU admissions at 130 of the 149 hospitals in California with a NICU. The aggregate service population comprised 358 453 live births. The individual NICU was the unit of observation and analysis. The analysis was stratified by designated facility level of care and correlations with the percentage admissions with high illness acuity were explored. The hypothesis at the outset of the study was that inborn admission rates would correlate positively with the percentage of admissions with high illness acuity. Exposures: Live birth at GA of 34 weeks or more. Main Outcomes and Measures: Inborn NICU admission rate. Results: Of the total of 358 453 live births at GA of 34 weeks or more, 35 921 infants were admitted to a NICU and accounted for 79.2% of all inborn NICU admissions; 4260 (11.9%) of these admissions met high illness acuity criteria. Inborn admission rates varied 34-fold, from 1.1% to 37.7% of births (median, 9.7%; mean [SD], 10.6% [5.8%]). Percentage with high illness acuity varied 40-fold, from 2.4% to 95% (median, 11.3%; mean, 13.2% [9.9%]). Inborn admission rate correlated inversely with percentage of admissions with high illness acuity (Spearman ρ = -0.3034, P < .001). Among regional NICUs capable of caring for patients with the highest degree of illness and support needs, inborn admission rate did not significantly correlate with percentage of admissions with high illness acuity (Spearman ρ = -0.21, P = .41). Conclusions and Relevance: Percentage of admissions with high illness acuity does not explain 34-fold variation in NICU inborn admission rates for neonates born at GA of 34 weeks or more. The findings are consistent with a supply-sensitive care component and invite future investigation to clarify the lower-acuity end of the range of conditions considered to warrant neonatal intensive care.
Importance: Most neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are born at gestational age (GA) of 34 weeks or more. The degree of uniformity of admission criteria for these infants is unclear, particularly at the low-acuity end of the range of conditions warranting admission. Objectives: To describe variation in NICU admission rates for neonates born at GA of 34 weeks or more and examine whether such variation is associated with high illness acuity or designated facility level of care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study of 35 921 NICU inborn admissions of GA at 34 weeks or more during calendar year 2015, using a population database of inborn NICU admissions at 130 of the 149 hospitals in California with a NICU. The aggregate service population comprised 358 453 live births. The individual NICU was the unit of observation and analysis. The analysis was stratified by designated facility level of care and correlations with the percentage admissions with high illness acuity were explored. The hypothesis at the outset of the study was that inborn admission rates would correlate positively with the percentage of admissions with high illness acuity. Exposures: Live birth at GA of 34 weeks or more. Main Outcomes and Measures: Inborn NICU admission rate. Results: Of the total of 358 453 live births at GA of 34 weeks or more, 35 921 infants were admitted to a NICU and accounted for 79.2% of all inborn NICU admissions; 4260 (11.9%) of these admissions met high illness acuity criteria. Inborn admission rates varied 34-fold, from 1.1% to 37.7% of births (median, 9.7%; mean [SD], 10.6% [5.8%]). Percentage with high illness acuity varied 40-fold, from 2.4% to 95% (median, 11.3%; mean, 13.2% [9.9%]). Inborn admission rate correlated inversely with percentage of admissions with high illness acuity (Spearman ρ = -0.3034, P < .001). Among regional NICUs capable of caring for patients with the highest degree of illness and support needs, inborn admission rate did not significantly correlate with percentage of admissions with high illness acuity (Spearman ρ = -0.21, P = .41). Conclusions and Relevance: Percentage of admissions with high illness acuity does not explain 34-fold variation in NICU inborn admission rates for neonates born at GA of 34 weeks or more. The findings are consistent with a supply-sensitive care component and invite future investigation to clarify the lower-acuity end of the range of conditions considered to warrant neonatal intensive care.
Authors: Jochen Profit; Marie C McCormick; Gabriel J Escobar; Douglas K Richardson; Zheng Zheng; Kim Coleman-Phox; Rebecca Roberts; John A F Zupancic Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Joseph Schulman; Robert J Dimand; Henry C Lee; Grace V Duenas; Mihoko V Bennett; Jeffrey B Gould Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Joseph Schulman; Jochen Profit; Henry C Lee; Grace Dueñas; Mihoko V Bennett; Janella Parucha; Maria A L Jocson; Jeffrey B Gould Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: David Dimmock; Sara Caylor; Bryce Waldman; Wendy Benson; Christina Ashburner; Jason L Carmichael; Jeanne Carroll; Elaine Cham; Shimul Chowdhury; John Cleary; Arthur D'Harlingue; A Doshi; Katarzyna Ellsworth; Carolina I Galarreta; Charlotte Hobbs; Kathleen Houtchens; Juliette Hunt; Priscilla Joe; Maries Joseph; Robert H Kaplan; Stephen F Kingsmore; Jason Knight; Aaina Kochhar; Richard G Kronick; Jolie Limon; Madelena Martin; Katherine A Rauen; Adam Schwarz; Suma P Shankar; Rosanna Spicer; Mario Augusto Rojas; Ofelia Vargas-Shiraishi; Kristen Wigby; Neda Zadeh; Lauge Farnaes Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Charlan D Kroelinger; Marion E Rice; Ekwutosi M Okoroh; Carla L DeSisto; Wanda D Barfield Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: S Derisbourg; E Costa; L De Luca; S Amirgholami; V Bogne Kamdem; A Vercoutere; W H Zhang; S Alexander; P M Buekens; Y Englert; A Pintiaux; C Daelemans Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: David Braun; Eric Braun; Vicki Chiu; Anthony E Burgos; Mandhir Gupta; Marianna Volodarskiy; Darios Getahun Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-06-01
Authors: David P Dimmock; Michelle M Clark; Mary Gaughran; Julie A Cakici; Sara A Caylor; Christina Clarke; Michele Feddock; Shimul Chowdhury; Lisa Salz; Cynthia Cheung; Lynne M Bird; Charlotte Hobbs; Kristen Wigby; Lauge Farnaes; Cinnamon S Bloss; Stephen F Kingsmore Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 11.043
Authors: Malini Mahendra; Martina Steurer-Muller; Samuel F Hohmann; Roberta L Keller; Anil Aswani; R Adams Dudley Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 2.521