Jochen Profit1,2, Jeffrey B Gould3,2, Mihoko Bennett3,2, Benjamin A Goldstein4, David Draper5, Ciaran S Phibbs3,6, Henry C Lee3,2. 1. Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California; profit@stanford.edu. 2. California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Palo Alto, California. 3. Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, and Center for Predictive Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 5. Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Baskin School of Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California; and. 6. Health Economics Resource Center and the Center for Innovation to Implementation Veteran's Affairs, Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differences in NICU quality of care provided to very low birth weight (<1500 g) infants may contribute to the persistence of racial and/or ethnic disparity. An examination of such disparities in a population-based sample across multiple dimensions of care and outcomes is lacking. METHODS: Prospective observational analysis of 18 616 very low birth weight infants in 134 California NICUs between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014. We assessed quality of care via the Baby-MONITOR, a composite indicator consisting of 9 process and outcome measures of quality. For each NICU, we calculated a risk-adjusted composite and individual component quality score for each race and/or ethnicity. We standardized each score to the overall population to compare quality of care between and within NICUs. RESULTS: We found clinically and statistically significant racial and/or ethnic variation in quality of care between NICUs as well as within NICUs. Composite quality scores ranged by 5.26 standard units (range: -2.30 to 2.96). Adjustment of Baby-MONITOR scores by race and/or ethnicity had only minimal effect on comparative assessments of NICU performance. Among subcomponents of the Baby-MONITOR, non-Hispanic white infants scored higher on measures of process compared with African Americans and Hispanics. Compared with whites, African Americans scored higher on measures of outcome; Hispanics scored lower on 7 of the 9 Baby-MONITOR subcomponents. CONCLUSIONS: Significant racial and/or ethnic variation in quality of care exists between and within NICUs. Providing feedback of disparity scores to NICUs could serve as an important starting point for promoting improvement and reducing disparities.
BACKGROUND: Differences in NICU quality of care provided to very low birth weight (<1500 g) infants may contribute to the persistence of racial and/or ethnic disparity. An examination of such disparities in a population-based sample across multiple dimensions of care and outcomes is lacking. METHODS: Prospective observational analysis of 18 616 very low birth weight infants in 134 California NICUs between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014. We assessed quality of care via the Baby-MONITOR, a composite indicator consisting of 9 process and outcome measures of quality. For each NICU, we calculated a risk-adjusted composite and individual component quality score for each race and/or ethnicity. We standardized each score to the overall population to compare quality of care between and within NICUs. RESULTS: We found clinically and statistically significant racial and/or ethnic variation in quality of care between NICUs as well as within NICUs. Composite quality scores ranged by 5.26 standard units (range: -2.30 to 2.96). Adjustment of Baby-MONITOR scores by race and/or ethnicity had only minimal effect on comparative assessments of NICU performance. Among subcomponents of the Baby-MONITOR, non-Hispanic white infants scored higher on measures of process compared with African Americans and Hispanics. Compared with whites, African Americans scored higher on measures of outcome; Hispanics scored lower on 7 of the 9 Baby-MONITOR subcomponents. CONCLUSIONS: Significant racial and/or ethnic variation in quality of care exists between and within NICUs. Providing feedback of disparity scores to NICUs could serve as an important starting point for promoting improvement and reducing disparities.
Authors: Roger Taylor; Anthony Bower; Federico Girosi; James Bigelow; Kateryna Fonkych; Richard Hillestad Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Leo S Morales; Douglas Staiger; Jeffrey D Horbar; Joseph Carpenter; Michael Kenny; Jeffrey Geppert; Jeannette Rogowski Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Henry C Lee; Richard J Powers; Mihoko V Bennett; Neil N Finer; Louis P Halamek; Courtney Nisbet; Margaret Crockett; Kathy Chance; David Blackney; Connie von Köhler; Paul Kurtin; Paul J Sharek Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: J Profit; J B Gould; J A F Zupancic; A R Stark; K M Wall; M A Kowalkowski; M Mei; K Pietz; E J Thomas; L A Petersen Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Krista Sigurdson; Jochen Profit; Ravi Dhurjati; Christine Morton; Melissa Scala; Lelis Vernon; Ashley Randolph; Jessica T Phan; Linda S Franck Journal: Qual Health Res Date: 2020-07-25
Authors: Jessica Liu; Margaret G Parker; Tianyao Lu; Shannon M Conroy; John Oehlert; Henry C Lee; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Salma Shariff-Marco; Jochen Profit Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Jessica Liu; Charlotte Sakarovitch; Krista Sigurdson; Henry C Lee; Jochen Profit Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Nansi S Boghossian; Marco Geraci; Scott A Lorch; Ciaran S Phibbs; Erika M Edwards; Jeffrey D Horbar Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 7.124