AIMS: The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate quality of life (QoL) and functional outcome in patients following anterior resection (AR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer, and (2) whether these outcomes were dependent on the level of anastomosis. METHODS: Patients who were without recurrent or metastatic disease were identified from the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Registry. QoL was assessed by the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38, and rectal function by a short questionnaire. Of 319 patients studied, 229 had undergone AR and 90 APR. The median age was 73 years, and the median time since surgery was 64 months. RESULTS: Mean QoL scores for body image and male sexual problems were better following AR than APR (P<0.01), also in patients with a low (< or = 3 cm) anastomosis. Patients who had undergone AR had higher mean scores for constipation (P<0.001) and more often used anti-diarrhoeal medication (P=0.005), than patients who had undergone APR. Patients with a low anastomosis (< or = 3 cm) had more incontinence for gas and solid stools (P<0.05), and had more incontinence (P=0.006) compared with patients with higher anastomosis, but there was no difference in QoL. Subgroup analysis showed that irradiated patients (n=34) had worse rectal function in terms of frequency, urgency, and incontinence (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although rectal function was impaired in patients with low anastomosis, patients who had undergone AR had better QoL than patients who had undergone APR.
AIMS: The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate quality of life (QoL) and functional outcome in patients following anterior resection (AR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer, and (2) whether these outcomes were dependent on the level of anastomosis. METHODS:Patients who were without recurrent or metastatic disease were identified from the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Registry. QoL was assessed by the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38, and rectal function by a short questionnaire. Of 319 patients studied, 229 had undergone AR and 90 APR. The median age was 73 years, and the median time since surgery was 64 months. RESULTS: Mean QoL scores for body image and male sexual problems were better following AR than APR (P<0.01), also in patients with a low (< or = 3 cm) anastomosis. Patients who had undergone AR had higher mean scores for constipation (P<0.001) and more often used anti-diarrhoeal medication (P=0.005), than patients who had undergone APR. Patients with a low anastomosis (< or = 3 cm) had more incontinence for gas and solid stools (P<0.05), and had more incontinence (P=0.006) compared with patients with higher anastomosis, but there was no difference in QoL. Subgroup analysis showed that irradiated patients (n=34) had worse rectal function in terms of frequency, urgency, and incontinence (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although rectal function was impaired in patients with low anastomosis, patients who had undergone AR had better QoL than patients who had undergone APR.
Authors: P G Vaughan-Shaw; A T King; T Cheung; N E Beck; J S Knight; P H Nichols; K P Nugent; S A Pilkington; J A Smallwood; A H Mirnezami Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Robert N Whistance; Rebecca Gilbert; Peter Fayers; Robert J Longman; Anne Pullyblank; Michael Thomas; Jane M Blazeby Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Salvatore Pucciarelli; Paola Del Bianco; Fabio Efficace; Paola Toppan; Samantha Serpentini; Maria Luisa Friso; Sara Lonardi; Gian Luca De Salvo; Donato Nitti Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Julie Smith-Gagen; Rosemary D Cress; Christiana M Drake; Patrick S Romano; Kathleen J Yost; John Z Ayanian Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Christos N Stoidis; Basileios G Spyropoulos; Evangelos P Misiakos; Christos K Fountzilas; Panorea P Paraskeva; Constantine I Fotiadis Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 2.754