Literature DB >> 34251436

Patient Access in 14 High-Income Countries to New Antibacterials Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, or Health Canada, 2010-2020.

Kevin Outterson1,2, Ebiowei S F Orubu3,4, John Rex5,6, Christine Årdal7, Muhammad H Zaman4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inaccessibility of medicines in low- and middle-income countries is a frequent challenge. Yet it is typically assumed that high-income countries have complete access to the full arsenal of medicines. This study tests this assumption for new antibacterials, which are saved as a last resort in order to prevent the development of resistance, resulting in insufficient revenues to offset costs. Prior studies report only regulatory approval, missing the important lag that occurs between approval and commercial launch, although some antibiotics never launch in some countries.
METHODS: We identified all antibacterials approved and launched in the G7 and 7 other high-income countries in Europe for the decade beginning 1 January 2010, using quantitative methods to explore associations.
RESULTS: Eighteen new antibacterials were identified. The majority were accessible in only 3 countries (United States, United Kingdom, and Sweden), with the remaining 11 high-income countries having access to less than half of them. European marketing authorization did not lead to automatic European access, as 14 of the antibacterials were approved by the European Medicines Agency but many fewer were commercially launched. There was no significant difference in access between "innovative" and "noninnovative" antibacterials. Median annual sales in the first launched market (generally the United States) for these 18 antibiotics were low, $16.2M.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient access to new antibacterials is limited in some high-income countries including Canada, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. With low expected sales, companies may have decided to delay or forego commercialization due to expectations of insufficient profitability.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access; antibacterial; approval; commercial launch

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34251436      PMCID: PMC8994582          DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   20.999


  13 in total

1.  Approval of new drugs 1999-2007: comparison of the US, the EU and Japan situations.

Authors:  K Tsuji; K Tsutani
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Pharmaceutical arbitrage: balancing access and innovation in international prescription drug markets.

Authors:  Kevin Outterson
Journal:  Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics       Date:  2005

3.  The 10 x '20 Initiative: pursuing a global commitment to develop 10 new antibacterial drugs by 2020.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Drug Policy in Greece.

Authors:  John N Yfantopoulos; Athanasios Chantzaras
Journal:  Value Health Reg Issues       Date:  2018-09-05

Review 5.  Delays in the submission of new drugs in Canada.

Authors:  Ali Shajarizadeh; Aidan Hollis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Antibiotic reimbursement in a model delinked from sales: a benchmark-based worldwide approach.

Authors:  John H Rex; Kevin Outterson
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 7.  Evaluating for-profit public benefit corporations as an additional structure for antibiotic development and commercialization.

Authors:  Kevin Outterson; John H Rex
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 7.012

8.  A shot in the arm for new antibiotics.

Authors:  Kevin Outterson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 9.  Designing development programs for non-traditional antibacterial agents.

Authors:  John H Rex; Holly Fernandez Lynch; I Glenn Cohen; Jonathan J Darrow; Kevin Outterson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  An international comparative analysis of public reimbursement of orphan drugs in Canadian provinces compared to European countries.

Authors:  Leanne Marie Ward; Alexandra Chambers; Emine Mechichi; Durhane Wong-Rieger; Craig Campbell
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.123

2.  Estimating the Economic and Clinical Value of Introducing Ceftazidime/Avibactam into Antimicrobial Practice in Japan: A Dynamic Modelling Study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Matsumoto; Akira Yuasa; Ryan Miller; Clive Pritchard; Takahisa Ohashi; Amer Taie; Jason Gordon
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2022-09-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.