Literature DB >> 34244898

Is the 21-Gene Recurrence Score on Core Needle Biopsy Equivalent to Surgical Specimen in Early-Stage Breast Cancer? A Comparison of Gene Expression Between Paired Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens.

Javier I J Orozco1, Shu-Ching Chang2, Diego M Marzese3, Janie G Grumley4, Chikako Matsuba1, Miquel Ensenyat-Mendez3, Gary L Grunkemeier2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Molecular testing on surgical specimens predicts disease recurrence and benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Testing on core biopsies has become common practice despite limited evidence of concordance between core/surgical samples. In this study, we compared the gene expression of the 21 genes and the recurrence score (RS) between paired core/surgical specimens.
METHODS: Eighty patients with HR+/HER2- EBC were evaluated from two publicly available gene expression datasets (GSE73235, GSE76728) with paired core/surgical specimens without neoadjuvant systemic therapy. The expression of the 21 genes was compared in paired samples. A microarray-based RS was calculated and a value ≥ 26 was defined as high-RS. The concordance rate and kappa statistic were used to evaluate the agreement between the RS of paired samples.
RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant difference and a high correlation in the gene expression levels of the 21 genes between paired samples. However, CD68 and RPLP0 in GSE73235, AURKA, BAG1, and TFRC in GSE76728, and MYLBL2 and ACTB in both datasets exhibited weak to moderate correlation (r < 0.5). There was a high correlation of the microarray-based RS between paired samples in GSE76728 (r = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-0.96) and GSE73235 (r = 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.89). There were no changes in RS category in GSE76728, whereas 82% of patients remained in the same RS category in GSE73235 (κ = 0.64).
CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression levels of the 21-gene RS showed a high correlation between paired specimens. Potential sampling and biological variability on a set of genes need to be considered to better estimate the RS from core needle biopsy.
© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34244898     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10457-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  33 in total

1.  Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†.

Authors:  F Cardoso; S Kyriakides; S Ohno; F Penault-Llorca; P Poortmans; I T Rubio; S Zackrisson; E Senkus
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Gong Tang; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Michael G Walker; Drew Watson; Taesung Park; William Hiller; Edwin R Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; John Bryant; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Clinical and Genomic Risk to Guide the Use of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Peter M Ravdin; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Matthew P Goetz; John A Olson; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Jeffrey Abrams; George W Sledge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A new molecular predictor of distant recurrence in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer adds independent information to conventional clinical risk factors.

Authors:  Martin Filipits; Margaretha Rudas; Raimund Jakesz; Peter Dubsky; Florian Fitzal; Christian F Singer; Otto Dietze; Richard Greil; Andrea Jelen; Paul Sevelda; Christa Freibauer; Volkmar Müller; Fritz Jänicke; Marcus Schmidt; Heinz Kölbl; Achim Rody; Manfred Kaufmann; Werner Schroth; Hiltrud Brauch; Matthias Schwab; Peter Fritz; Karsten E Weber; Inke S Feder; Guido Hennig; Ralf Kronenwett; Mathias Gehrmann; Michael Gnant
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lyndsay N Harris; Nofisat Ismaila; Lisa M McShane; Fabrice Andre; Deborah E Collyar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Elizabeth H Hammond; Nicole M Kuderer; Minetta C Liu; Robert G Mennel; Catherine Van Poznak; Robert C Bast; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Fatima Cardoso; Laura J van't Veer; Jan Bogaerts; Leen Slaets; Giuseppe Viale; Suzette Delaloge; Jean-Yves Pierga; Etienne Brain; Sylvain Causeret; Mauro DeLorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Theodora Goulioti; Susan Knox; Erika Matos; Bart Meulemans; Peter A Neijenhuis; Ulrike Nitz; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Peter Ravdin; Isabel T Rubio; Mahasti Saghatchian; Tineke J Smilde; Christos Sotiriou; Lisette Stork; Carolyn Straehle; Geraldine Thomas; Alastair M Thompson; Jacobus M van der Hoeven; Peter Vuylsteke; René Bernards; Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Emiel Rutgers; Martine Piccart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Gene expression profiles predict complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Ayers; W F Symmans; J Stec; A I Damokosh; E Clark; K Hess; M Lecocke; J Metivier; D Booser; N Ibrahim; V Valero; M Royce; B Arun; G Whitman; J Ross; N Sneige; G N Hortobagyi; L Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Predicting distant recurrence in receptor-positive breast cancer patients with limited clinicopathological risk: using the PAM50 Risk of Recurrence score in 1478 postmenopausal patients of the ABCSG-8 trial treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone.

Authors:  M Gnant; M Filipits; R Greil; H Stoeger; M Rudas; Z Bago-Horvath; B Mlineritsch; W Kwasny; M Knauer; C Singer; R Jakesz; P Dubsky; F Fitzal; R Bartsch; G Steger; M Balic; S Ressler; J W Cowens; J Storhoff; S Ferree; C Schaper; S Liu; C Fesl; T O Nielsen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Matthew P Goetz; John A Olson; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter M Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Jeffrey Abrams; George W Sledge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Breast Cancer Index Predicts Extended Endocrine Benefit to Individualize Selection of Patients with HR+ Early-stage Breast Cancer for 10 Years of Endocrine Therapy.

Authors:  Iris Noordhoek; Kai Treuner; Hein Putter; Yi Zhang; Jenna Wong; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Marjolijn Duijm-de Carpentier; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Catherine A Schnabel; Gerrit-Jan Liefers
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  4 in total

1.  Ki-67 and breast cancer prognosis: does it matter if Ki-67 level is examined using preoperative biopsy or postoperative specimen?

Authors:  Soon Bo Choi; Jung Min Park; Jee Hyun Ahn; Jieon Go; Jeeye Kim; Hyung Seok Park; Seung Il Kim; Byeong-Woo Park; Seho Park
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  How Reliable Are Gene Expression-Based and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers Assessed on a Core-Needle Biopsy? A Study of Paired Core-Needle Biopsies and Surgical Specimens in Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hani Saghir; Srinivas Veerla; Martin Malmberg; Lisa Rydén; Anna Ehinger; Lao H Saal; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Åke Borg; Cecilia Hegardt; Christer Larsson; Alaa Haidar; Ingrid Hedenfalk; Niklas Loman; Siker Kimbung
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  ASO Author Reflections: Molecular Testing in Breast Cancer: Is Core Biopsy Equivalent to Surgical Specimen?

Authors:  Javier I J Orozco; Janie G Grumley
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  22nd Annual Virtual Meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Science, Innovation, and Practice Changes.

Authors:  Katherina Zabicki Calvillo; Sarah L Blair; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 5.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.