Literature DB >> 34244874

Reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes of single and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

James S Chambers1, Robert G Kropp2, Raymond J Gardocki3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to identify the 2 year rate of reoperation and determine patient-reported outcomes after elective one- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with structural allograft and anterior plating using indications similar to cervical disc arthroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 116 consecutive one- and two-level primary ACDF for adult degenerative disease with structural allograft and anterior plating in one surgeon's practice. Patient-reported visual analog score (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and radiographs, collected prospectively on all operative patients preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were reviewed. Patient demographics and reoperation rates were obtained from the chart.
RESULTS: One hundred and four patients were identified with a final reoperation rate of 2.9% at a mean final follow-up 2 years (95% CI 17.2-29.0). No reoperations occurred within 90 days. After 1 year, three patients required reoperation. The mean patient-reported outcomes improved (VAS, 6.6 preoperatively to 3.0 at final follow-up and ODI, 24.3 preoperatively to 12.3 at final follow-up). These improvements were statistically significant (p < 0.01). No significant patient risk factors for reoperation were found.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of reoperation for one- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at follow-up was found to be lower than those previously published in the literature quoted for CDA. Arthrodesis continues to demonstrate improvements in patient-reported outcomes.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACDF; Anterior cervical discectomy fusion; Outcome; Reoperation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34244874     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04056-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  15 in total

1.  Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.

Authors:  Jason C Eck; S Craig Humphreys; Tae-Hong Lim; Soon Tack Jeong; Jesse G Kim; Scott D Hodges; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China.

Authors:  Xuesong Zhang; Xuelian Zhang; Chao Chen; Yonggang Zhang; Zheng Wang; Bin Wang; Wangjun Yan; Ming Li; Wen Yuan; Yan Wang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.

Authors:  Bryan W Cunningham; Nianbin Hu; Candace M Zorn; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Rate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single-level fusion: meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Kushagra Verma; Sapan D Gandhi; Mitchell Maltenfort; Todd J Albert; Alan S Hilibrand; Alexander R Vaccaro; Kristin E Radcliff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article.

Authors:  Domagoj Coric; Pierce D Nunley; Richard D Guyer; David Musante; Cameron N Carmody; Charles R Gordon; Carl Lauryssen; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Margaret O Boltes
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-06-24

6.  Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Outcomes over 10 Years: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Praveen V Mummaneni; J Kenneth Burkus; Regis W Haid; Vincent C Traynelis; Thomas A Zdeblick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-03

8.  Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Rick C Sasso; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Reoperation After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhao-Ming Zhong; Shi-Yuan Zhu; Jing-Shen Zhuang; Qian Wu; Jian-Ting Chen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient-Reported Satisfaction After Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Andreas Kiilerich Andresen; Rune Tendal Paulsen; Frederik Busch; Alexander Isenberg-Jørgensen; Leah Y Carreon; Mikkel Ø Andersen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-04-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.