Literature DB >> 28604488

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Outcomes over 10 Years: A Prospective Study.

Glenn R Buttermann1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with >10-year follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term, >10-year clinical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and to compare outcomes based on primary diagnosis of disc herniation, stenosis or advanced degenerative disc disease (DDD), number of levels treated, and preexisting adjacent level degeneration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF is a proven treatment for patients with stenosis and disc herniation and results in significantly improved short- and intermediate-term outcomes. Motion preservation treatments may result in improved long-term outcomes but need to be compared to long-term ACDF outcomes reference.
METHODS: Patients who had disc herniation, stenosis, and DDD and underwent ACDF with or without decompression were prospectively enrolled and followed for a minimum of 10 years with outcome assessment at various intervals. All 159 consecutive patients had autogenous tricortical iliac crest bone graft and plate instrumentation used. Outcomes included visual analog scale for neck and arm pain. pain drawing, Oswestry Disability Index, and self-assessment of procedure success. Preoperative adjacent-level disc degeneration, pseudarthrosis, and secondary operations were analyzed.
RESULTS: For all diagnostic groups, significant outcomes improvement was seen at all follow-up periods for all scales relative to preoperative scores. Outcomes were not related to age, gender, number of levels treated, and minimally to preexisting degeneration at the adjacent level. The use of narcotic pain medication decreased substantially. Neurological deficits almost all resolved. Patient self-reported success ranged from 85% to 95%. Over the long term, additional surgery for pseudarthrosis (10%) occurred in the early follow-up period, and for adjacent segment degeneration (21%), which occurred linearly during the >10-year follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: ACDF leads to significantly improved outcomes for all primary diagnoses and was sustained for >10 years' follow-up. Secondary surgeries were performed for pseudarthrosis repair and for symptomatic adjacent-level degeneration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28604488     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  31 in total

1.  Motion analysis of dynamic cervical implant stabilization versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a retrospective analysis of 70 cases.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Huarong Wu; Jin Chu; Mozhen Liu; Shuxun Hou; Shunzhi Yu; Tiesheng Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative-4 Joint Consensus Statement on Persistent Postoperative Opioid Use: Definition, Incidence, Risk Factors, and Health Care System Initiatives.

Authors:  Michael L Kent; Robert W Hurley; Gary M Oderda; Debra B Gordon; Eric Sun; Monty Mythen; Timothy E Miller; Andrew D Shaw; Tong J Gan; Julie K M Thacker; Matthew D McEvoy
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  The Global Spine Care Initiative: a summary of guidelines on invasive interventions for the management of persistent and disabling spinal pain in low- and middle-income communities.

Authors:  Emre Acaroğlu; Margareta Nordin; Kristi Randhawa; Roger Chou; Pierre Côté; Tiro Mmopelwa; Scott Haldeman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Expectoration of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion cage: a case report.

Authors:  Parker J Prusick; Shahbaaz A Sabri; Christopher J Kleck
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-06

5.  Reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes of single and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  James S Chambers; Robert G Kropp; Raymond J Gardocki
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  A single center retrospective clinical evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion comparing allograft spacers to silicon nitride cages.

Authors:  Micah W Smith; Daniel R Romano; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

Review 7.  Strategies to Achieve Spinal Fusion in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: An Overview.

Authors:  Michael H McCarthy; Joseph A Weiner; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-12-09

8.  Symptomatic pseudarthrosis requiring revision surgery after 1- or 2-level ACDF with plating: peek versus allograft.

Authors:  Abdul Fettah Buyuk; Ikemefuna Onyekwelu; Christian J Gaffney; Amir A Mehbod; John M Dawson; Timothy A Garvey; Benjamin Mueller; James D Schwender
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

9.  Multilevel cervical arthroplasty-clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Rui Reinas; Djamel Kitumba; Leopoldina Pereira; António M Baptista; Óscar L Alves
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-03

10.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes using third-generation bioactive glass as a bone graft substitute for multi-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion-a retrospective case series study.

Authors:  Gilberto Gomez; L Erik Westerlund
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.