| Literature DB >> 34242586 |
Paweł Więch1, Izabela Sałacińska2, Michał Bączek3, Dariusz Bazaliński2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Monitoring of healthy children should include precise assessment of their nutritional status to identify children and adolescents at risk of nutrition disorders. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the nutritional status of healthy children using different nutritional risk screening tools.Entities:
Keywords: Body composition; Children; Health; Nutrition indicators; Nutritional assessment
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34242586 PMCID: PMC9432148 DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2021.05.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pediatr (Rio J) ISSN: 0021-7557 Impact factor: 2.990
Figure 1Flow-chart demonstrating study participants' selection.
BIA results in the study group of girls and boys.
| Param. | Age | Sex | Mean | SD | sex | age | sex*age | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FM (kg) | 7–9 y | Boys | 9.89 | 4.56 | 17.09 | < 0.001 | 12.96 | 8.41 | ||
| Girls | 9.92 | 4.73 | ||||||||
| 10–12 y | Boys | 10.18 | 5.69 | |||||||
| Girls | 11.12 | 5.03 | ||||||||
| 13–15 y | Boys | 11.33 | 6.95 | |||||||
| Girls | 15.70 | 7.85 | ||||||||
| FM (%) | 7–9 y | Boys | 28.65 | 8.26 | 45.08 | < 0.001 | 37.87 | 9.20 | ||
| Girls | 30.06 | 8.84 | ||||||||
| 10–12 y | Boys | 21.87 | 7.30 | |||||||
| Girls | 25.10 | 5.69 | ||||||||
| 13–15 y | Boys | 18.42 | 7.69 | |||||||
| Girls | 26.91 | 6.45 | ||||||||
| FFM (kg) | 7–9 y | Boys | 23.28 | 4.66 | 44.88 | < 0.001 | 395.18 | 9.46 | ||
| Girls | 21.52 | 2.66 | ||||||||
| 10–12 y | Boys | 33.93 | 6.74 | |||||||
| Girls | 31.75 | 6.07 | ||||||||
| 13–15 y | Boys | 47.34 | 8.79 | |||||||
| Girls | 39.93 | 6.49 | ||||||||
| FFM (%) | 7–9 y | Boys | 71.35 | 8.26 | 45.60 | < 0.001 | 38.33 | 9.03 | ||
| Girls | 69.85 | 8.89 | ||||||||
| 10–12 y | Boys | 78.13 | 7.30 | |||||||
| Girls | 74.90 | 5.69 | ||||||||
| 13–15 y | Boys | 81.58 | 7.69 | |||||||
| Girls | 73.09 | 6.45 | ||||||||
| BCM (kg) | 7–9 y | Boys | 11.78 | 2.58 | 40.35 | < 0.001 | 371.19 | 11.50 | ||
| Girls | 10.97 | 1.90 | ||||||||
| 10–12 y | Boys | 17.52 | 3.56 | |||||||
| Girls | 16.46 | 3.68 | ||||||||
| 13–15 y | Boys | 25.68 | 5.61 | |||||||
| Girls | 21.23 | 3.66 | ||||||||
| BCM (%) | 7–9 y | Boys | 50.47 | 2.81 | 0.50 | 0.480 | 37.9 | 1.60 | 0.199 | |
| Girls | 50.80 | 3.40 | ||||||||
| 10–12 y | Boys | 51.63 | 2.63 | |||||||
| Girls | 51.61 | 2.93 | ||||||||
| 13–15 y | Boys | 53.98 | 2.63 | |||||||
| Girls | 53.12 | 2.87 | ||||||||
| TBW (L) | 7–9 y | Boys | 18.15 | 3.75 | 143.16 | 600.26 | 22.12 | |||
| Girls | 16.71 | 2.14 | ||||||||
| 10–12 y | Boys | 28.72 | 4.17 | |||||||
| Girls | 25.18 | 3.31 | ||||||||
| 13–15 y | Boys | 37.13 | 5.54 | |||||||
| Girls | 29.63 | 3.38 | ||||||||
| TBW (%) | 7–9 y | Boys | 55.56 | 6.39 | 84.55 | 68.50 | 12.35 | |||
| Girls | 54.26 | 6.80 | ||||||||
| 10–12 y | Boys | 66.90 | 8.17 | |||||||
| Girls | 60.17 | 6.84 | ||||||||
| 13–15 y | Boys | 64.42 | 6.72 | |||||||
| Girls | 54.82 | 6.81 | ||||||||
FM, fat mass; FFM, fat free mass; BCM, body cell mass; TBW, total body water; SD, standard deviation.
Bold characters indicate significant values (p < 0.05).
F test - two-way analysis of variance Anova.
Anthropometric parameters of the study participants.
| Parameter | Group | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7–9 y ( | 10–12 y ( | 13–15 y ( | |||||||
| Median | Q1 | Q3 | Median | Q1 | Q3 | Median | Q1 | Q3 | |
| Weight (kg) | 31.0 | 27.3 | 36.0 | 41.0 | 36.0 | 49.3 | 55.0 | 47.8 | 64.0 |
| Height (cm) | 135.0 | 130.5 | 139.3 | 150.5 | 144.0 | 156.0 | 164.5 | 158.5 | 170.5 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 16.9 | 15.4 | 19.4 | 18.4 | 16.7 | 20.9 | 19.8 | 18.3 | 22.6 |
| BMI Z-score | −0.66 | −1.07 | 0.04 | −0.24 | −0.70 | 0.45 | 0.15 | −0.26 | 0.92 |
| R (Ohm) | 712.0 | 671.0 | 761.0 | 672.5 | 626.0 | 731.0 | 599.0 | 548.0 | 664.0 |
| XC (Ohm) | 67.0 | 62.7 | 73.0 | 66.7 | 61.0 | 72.0 | 62.6 | 57.0 | 67.8 |
| PA | 5.4 | 5.1 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 6.3 |
BMI, body mass index; BMI Z-score, body mass index Z-score; R, resistance; XC, reactance; PA, phase angle.
Values are presented as median and quartiles (Q1, quartile 1; Q3, quartile 3).
Comparative analysis of FM, FFM and BMI in healthy children.
| Age Groups (years) | Centiles | Girls / n (100%) | Boys / n (100%) | Total / n (100%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FM | FFM | BMI | FM | FFM | BMI | FM | FFM | BMI | ||
| ≤ 2 | 3 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.8) | 7 (2.3) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (1.8) | 10 (1.8) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (1.3) | |
| ≤ 2 | 2 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.5) | 2 (2.8) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (6.8) | 4 (2.9) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (4.3) | |
| ≤ 2 | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.7) | 2 (1.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.4) | |
| ≤ 2 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (3.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
FM, fat mass; FFM, fat-free mass; BMI, body mass index.