| Literature DB >> 34237278 |
Anaïs Llorens1, Athina Tzovara2, Ludovic Bellier3, Ilina Bhaya-Grossman4, Aurélie Bidet-Caulet5, William K Chang3, Zachariah R Cross6, Rosa Dominguez-Faus7, Adeen Flinker8, Yvonne Fonken9, Mark A Gorenstein10, Chris Holdgraf11, Colin W Hoy3, Maria V Ivanova12, Richard T Jimenez3, Soyeon Jun13, Julia W Y Kam14, Celeste Kidd12, Enitan Marcelle3, Deborah Marciano15, Stephanie Martin16, Nicholas E Myers17, Karita Ojala18, Anat Perry19, Pedro Pinheiro-Chagas20, Stephanie K Riès21, Ignacio Saez22, Ivan Skelin23, Katarina Slama3, Brooke Staveland15, Danielle S Bassett24, Elizabeth A Buffalo25, Adrienne L Fairhall26, Nancy J Kopell27, Laura J Kray28, Jack J Lin29, Anna C Nobre30, Dylan Riley31, Anne-Kristin Solbakk32, Joni D Wallis10, Xiao-Jing Wang33, Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg34, Sabine Kastner35, Robert T Knight10, Nina F Dronkers36.
Abstract
Despite increased awareness of the lack of gender equity in academia and a growing number of initiatives to address issues of diversity, change is slow, and inequalities remain. A major source of inequity is gender bias, which has a substantial negative impact on the careers, work-life balance, and mental health of underrepresented groups in science. Here, we argue that gender bias is not a single problem but manifests as a collection of distinct issues that impact researchers' lives. We disentangle these facets and propose concrete solutions that can be adopted by individuals, academic institutions, and society.Entities:
Mesh：
Year: 2021 PMID： 34237278 PMCID： PMC8553227 DOI： 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuron ISSN： 0896-6273 Impact factor: 18.688