Literature DB >> 33454405

Embracing diversity and inclusivity in an academic setting: Insights from the Organization for Human Brain Mapping.

Athina Tzovara1, Ishmael Amarreh2, Valentina Borghesani3, M Mallar Chakravarty4, Elizabeth DuPre5, Christian Grefkes6, Amelie Haugg7, Lee Jollans8, Hyang Woon Lee9, Sharlene D Newman10, Rosanna K Olsen11, J Tilak Ratnanather12, Gina Rippon13, Lucina Q Uddin14, Maria L Bringas Vega15, Michele Veldsman16, Tonya White17, AmanPreet Badhwar18.   

Abstract

Scientific research aims to bring forward innovative ideas and constantly challenges existing knowledge structures and stereotypes. However, women, ethnic and cultural minorities, as well as individuals with disabilities, are systematically discriminated against or even excluded from promotions, publications, and general visibility. A more diverse workforce is more productive, and thus discrimination has a negative impact on science and the wider society, as well as on the education, careers, and well-being of individuals who are discriminated against. Moreover, the lack of diversity at scientific gatherings can lead to micro-aggressions or harassment, making such meetings unpleasant, or even unsafe environments for early career and underrepresented scientists. At the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM), we recognized the need for promoting underrepresented scientists and creating diverse role models in the field of neuroimaging. To foster this, the OHBM has created a Diversity and Inclusivity Committee (DIC). In this article, we review the composition and activities of the DIC that have promoted diversity within OHBM, in order to inspire other organizations to implement similar initiatives. Activities of the committee over the past four years have included (a) creating a code of conduct, (b) providing diversity and inclusivity education for OHBM members, (c) organizing interviews and symposia on diversity issues, and (d) organizing family-friendly activities and providing childcare grants during the OHBM annual meetings. We strongly believe that these activities have brought positive change within the wider OHBM community, improving inclusivity and fostering diversity while promoting rigorous, ground-breaking science. These positive changes could not have been so rapidly implemented without the enthusiastic support from the leadership, including OHBM Council and Program Committee, and the OHBM Special Interest Groups (SIGs), namely the Open Science, Student and Postdoc, and Brain-Art SIGs. Nevertheless, there remains ample room for improvement, in all areas, and even more so in the area of targeted attempts to increase inclusivity for women, individuals with disabilities, members of the LGBTQ+ community, racial/ethnic minorities, and individuals of lower socioeconomic status or from low and middle-income countries. Here, we present an overview of the DIC's composition, its activities, future directions and challenges. Our goal is to share our experiences with a wider audience to provide information to other organizations and institutions wishing to implement similar comprehensive diversity initiatives. We propose that scientific organizations can push the boundaries of scientific progress only by moving beyond existing power structures and by integrating principles of equity and inclusivity in their core values.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33454405     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  4 in total

1.  Centering inclusivity in the design of online conferences-An OHBM-Open Science perspective.

Authors:  Elizabeth Levitis; Cassandra D Gould van Praag; Rémi Gau; Stephan Heunis; Elizabeth DuPre; Gregory Kiar; Katherine L Bottenhorn; Tristan Glatard; Aki Nikolaidis; Kirstie Jane Whitaker; Matteo Mancini; Guiomar Niso; Soroosh Afyouni; Eva Alonso-Ortiz; Stefan Appelhoff; Aurina Arnatkeviciute; Selim Melvin Atay; Tibor Auer; Giulia Baracchini; Johanna M M Bayer; Michael J S Beauvais; Janine D Bijsterbosch; Isil P Bilgin; Saskia Bollmann; Steffen Bollmann; Rotem Botvinik-Nezer; Molly G Bright; Vince D Calhoun; Xiao Chen; Sidhant Chopra; Hu Chuan-Peng; Thomas G Close; Savannah L Cookson; R Cameron Craddock; Alejandro De La Vega; Benjamin De Leener; Damion V Demeter; Paola Di Maio; Erin W Dickie; Simon B Eickhoff; Oscar Esteban; Karolina Finc; Matteo Frigo; Saampras Ganesan; Melanie Ganz; Kelly G Garner; Eduardo A Garza-Villarreal; Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla; Rohit Goswami; John D Griffiths; Tijl Grootswagers; Samuel Guay; Olivia Guest; Daniel A Handwerker; Peer Herholz; Katja Heuer; Dorien C Huijser; Vittorio Iacovella; Michael J E Joseph; Agah Karakuzu; David B Keator; Xenia Kobeleva; Manoj Kumar; Angela R Laird; Linda J Larson-Prior; Alexandra Lautarescu; Alberto Lazari; Jon Haitz Legarreta; Xue-Ying Li; Jinglei Lv; Sina Mansour L; David Meunier; Dustin Moraczewski; Tulika Nandi; Samuel A Nastase; Matthias Nau; Stephanie Noble; Martin Norgaard; Johnes Obungoloch; Robert Oostenveld; Edwina R Orchard; Ana Luísa Pinho; Russell A Poldrack; Anqi Qiu; Pradeep Reddy Raamana; Ariel Rokem; Saige Rutherford; Malvika Sharan; Thomas B Shaw; Warda T Syeda; Meghan M Testerman; Roberto Toro; Sofie L Valk; Sofie Van Den Bossche; Gaël Varoquaux; František Váša; Michele Veldsman; Jakub Vohryzek; Adina S Wagner; Reubs J Walsh; Tonya White; Fu-Te Wong; Xihe Xie; Chao-Gan Yan; Yu-Fang Yang; Yohan Yee; Gaston E Zanitti; Ana E Van Gulick; Eugene Duff; Camille Maumet
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 7.658

Review 2.  Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.

Authors:  Anaïs Llorens; Athina Tzovara; Ludovic Bellier; Ilina Bhaya-Grossman; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; William K Chang; Zachariah R Cross; Rosa Dominguez-Faus; Adeen Flinker; Yvonne Fonken; Mark A Gorenstein; Chris Holdgraf; Colin W Hoy; Maria V Ivanova; Richard T Jimenez; Soyeon Jun; Julia W Y Kam; Celeste Kidd; Enitan Marcelle; Deborah Marciano; Stephanie Martin; Nicholas E Myers; Karita Ojala; Anat Perry; Pedro Pinheiro-Chagas; Stephanie K Riès; Ignacio Saez; Ivan Skelin; Katarina Slama; Brooke Staveland; Danielle S Bassett; Elizabeth A Buffalo; Adrienne L Fairhall; Nancy J Kopell; Laura J Kray; Jack J Lin; Anna C Nobre; Dylan Riley; Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Joni D Wallis; Xiao-Jing Wang; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Sabine Kastner; Robert T Knight; Nina F Dronkers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 18.688

3.  Supporting Equity and Inclusion of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Individuals in Professional Organizations.

Authors:  Julia Jones Huyck; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Brad N Buran; Henry J Adler; Samuel R Atcherson; Ozan Cakmak; Robert T Dwyer; Morgan Eddolls; Fadhel El May; Juergen-Theodor Fraenzer; Rebekah Funkhouser; Mathilde Gagliardini; Frederick J Gallun; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Samir Gouin; Joseph Heng; Ariel Edward Hight; Zina Jawadi; Damir Kovacic; Rachit Kumar; Santosh Kumar; Stacey R Lim; Chengeng Mo; Lisa S Nolan; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Dominic V Pisano; Valluri R Rao; Robert M Raphael; Lina A J Reiss; Nathaniel J Spencer; Stephen J Tang; Viral D Tejani; Emma D Tran; Mikaeel Valli; Greg D Watkins; Rachel V Wayne; Lindsey R Wheeler; Stephanie L White; Victor Wong; M Caroline Yuk; J Tilak Ratnanather; Peter S Steyger
Journal:  Front Educ (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-15

4.  A perspective on enhancing representative samples in developmental human neuroscience: Connecting science to society.

Authors:  Kayla H Green; Ilse H Van De Groep; Lysanne W Te Brinke; Renske van der Cruijsen; Fabienne van Rossenberg; Hanan El Marroun
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.