Hannah A Valantine1, Daisy Grewal, Manwai Candy Ku, Julie Moseley, Mei-Chiung Shih, David Stevenson, Philip A Pizzo. 1. Dr. Valantine is professor of medicine and senior associate dean for diversity and leadership, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Dr. Grewal is associate director, Office of Diversity and Leadership, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Dr. Ku is program director and senior research scientist, Office of Diversity and Leadership, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Dr. Moseley is director of organizational effectiveness, Office of Diversity and Leadership, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Dr. Shih is assistant professor of biostatistics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Dr. Stevenson is vice dean and senior associate dean for academic affairs, Harold K. Faber Professor of Pediatrics, and professor, by courtesy, of obstetrics and gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Dr. Pizzo is David and Susan Heckerman Professor of Pediatrics and of Microbiology and Immunology and former dean of the School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess whether the proportion of women faculty, especially at the full professor rank, increased from 2004 to 2010 at Stanford University School of Medicine after a multifaceted intervention. METHOD: The authors surveyed gender composition and faculty satisfaction five to seven years after initiating a multifaceted intervention to expand recruitment and development of women faculty. The authors assessed pre/post relative change and rates of increase in women faculty at each rank, and faculty satisfaction; and differences in pre/post change and estimated rate of increase between Stanford and comparator cohorts (nationally and at peer institutions). RESULTS: Post intervention, women faculty increased by 74% (234 to 408), with assistant, associate, and full professors increasing by 66% (108 to 179), 87% (74 to 138), and 75% (52 to 91), respectively. Nationally and at peer institutions, women faculty increased by about 30% (30,230 to 39,200 and 4,370 to 5,754, respectively), with lower percentages at each rank compared with Stanford. Estimated difference (95% CI) in annual rate of increase was larger for Stanford versus the national cohort: combined ranks 0.36 (0.17 to 0.56), P = .001; full professor 0.40 (0.18 to 0.62), P = .001; and versus the peer cohort: combined ranks 0.29 (0.07 to 0.51), P = .02; full professor 0.37 (0.14 to 0.60), P = .003. Stanford women faculty satisfaction increased from 48% (2003) to 71% (2008). CONCLUSIONS: Increased satisfaction and proportion of women faculty, especially full professors, suggest that the intervention may ameliorate the gender gap in academic medicine.
PURPOSE: To assess whether the proportion of women faculty, especially at the full professor rank, increased from 2004 to 2010 at Stanford University School of Medicine after a multifaceted intervention. METHOD: The authors surveyed gender composition and faculty satisfaction five to seven years after initiating a multifaceted intervention to expand recruitment and development of women faculty. The authors assessed pre/post relative change and rates of increase in women faculty at each rank, and faculty satisfaction; and differences in pre/post change and estimated rate of increase between Stanford and comparator cohorts (nationally and at peer institutions). RESULTS: Post intervention, women faculty increased by 74% (234 to 408), with assistant, associate, and full professors increasing by 66% (108 to 179), 87% (74 to 138), and 75% (52 to 91), respectively. Nationally and at peer institutions, women faculty increased by about 30% (30,230 to 39,200 and 4,370 to 5,754, respectively), with lower percentages at each rank compared with Stanford. Estimated difference (95% CI) in annual rate of increase was larger for Stanford versus the national cohort: combined ranks 0.36 (0.17 to 0.56), P = .001; full professor 0.40 (0.18 to 0.62), P = .001; and versus the peer cohort: combined ranks 0.29 (0.07 to 0.51), P = .02; full professor 0.37 (0.14 to 0.60), P = .003. Stanford women faculty satisfaction increased from 48% (2003) to 71% (2008). CONCLUSIONS: Increased satisfaction and proportion of women faculty, especially full professors, suggest that the intervention may ameliorate the gender gap in academic medicine.
Authors: Anaïs Llorens; Athina Tzovara; Ludovic Bellier; Ilina Bhaya-Grossman; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; William K Chang; Zachariah R Cross; Rosa Dominguez-Faus; Adeen Flinker; Yvonne Fonken; Mark A Gorenstein; Chris Holdgraf; Colin W Hoy; Maria V Ivanova; Richard T Jimenez; Soyeon Jun; Julia W Y Kam; Celeste Kidd; Enitan Marcelle; Deborah Marciano; Stephanie Martin; Nicholas E Myers; Karita Ojala; Anat Perry; Pedro Pinheiro-Chagas; Stephanie K Riès; Ignacio Saez; Ivan Skelin; Katarina Slama; Brooke Staveland; Danielle S Bassett; Elizabeth A Buffalo; Adrienne L Fairhall; Nancy J Kopell; Laura J Kray; Jack J Lin; Anna C Nobre; Dylan Riley; Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Joni D Wallis; Xiao-Jing Wang; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Sabine Kastner; Robert T Knight; Nina F Dronkers Journal: Neuron Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 18.688
Authors: Jeane Ann Grisso; Mary Dupuis Sammel; Arthur H Rubenstein; Rebecca M Speck; Emily F Conant; Patricia Scott; Lucy Wolf Tuton; Alyssa Friede Westring; Stewart Friedman; Stephanie B Abbuhl Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 2.681