| Literature DB >> 34237098 |
Getahun Asebe1,2, Daniela Michlmayr3, Gezahegne Mamo1, Woldaregay Erku Abegaz4, Adugna Endale5,6, Girmay Medhin5, James W Larrick7, Mengistu Legesse5.
Abstract
Yellow fever (YF), Chikungunya (CHIK), and Zika(ZIK) are among re-emerging arboviral diseases of major public health concern. Despite the proximity of the Gambella Region to South Sudan where arboviral cases have been recorded repeatedly the current epidemiological situation is unclear in this part of southwest Ethiopia. Therefore, we conducted a community-based seroprevalence survey of YF virus (YFV), CHIK virus (CHIKV), and ZIK virus (ZIKV) infections in two selected districts. A cross-sectional study was conducted in two locations of the Gambella region (Lare and Itang) to investigate the seroprevalence of these viruses' infections. Blood samples were collected from the study participants and screened for IgG antibodies specific to YFV and CHIKV infections using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). For the detection of ZIKV specific IgG antibodies, Blockade-of-binding ELISA was used. Data were analyzed using the STATA version 13.1 Softwares. A total of 150 individuals (96 males and 54 females, age ranging from 18 to 65 years, mean age ± SD = 35.92 ± 10.99) participated and provided blood samples. Among the 150 samples 135, 90, and 150 were screened for YFV, CHIKV, and ZIKV, respectively. Hence, 2.9% (95% CI: 1.1-7.7%), 15.6% (95% CI: 9.3-24.8%), and 27.3% (95% CI: 20.7-35.3%) of samples tested positive for IgG antibodies to YFV, CHIKV, and ZIKV infections, respectively. Among the individual seropositive for ZIKV, YFV and CHIKV, only six, one and three had a history of residence outside the Gambella region respectively. Agro-pastoral occupation was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of IgG against CHIKV (AOR = 14.17; 95%CI: 2.30, 87.30) and residency in the Lare district (AOR = 11; 95%CI: 3.31, 39.81) was found to be significantly associated with a higher prevalence of IgG against ZIKV. Our findings revealed the occurrence of YFV, CHIKV and ZIKV infections in the study locations.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34237098 PMCID: PMC8266044 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253953
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Map of the study site (Lare district and Itang special districts).
Socio-demographic characteristics (N = 150).
| Variables | Response category | Travel history | History of working in the forest | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes N(%) | No N(%) | Yes N(%) | No N(%) | ||
| Sex | Male | 16(16.7) | 80(83.3) | 79(82.3) | 17(17.7) |
| Female | 4(7.4) | 50(92.6) | 47(87.0) | 7(13.0) | |
| District | Itang | 15(12.8) | 102(87.2) | 96(82.1) | 21(17.9) |
| Lare | 5(15.2) | 28(84.8) | 30(90.9) | 3(9.1) | |
| Age (years) | 18–30 years | 10(17.5) | 47(82.5) | 48(84.2) | 9(15.8) |
| 31–40 years | 5(10.2) | 44(89.8) | 40(81.6) | 9(18.4) | |
| ≥41 years | 5(11.4) | 39(88.6) | 38(86.4) | 6(13.6) | |
| Ethnicity | Nuer | 15(15.5) | 82(84.5) | 92(94.8) | 5(5.2) |
| Agnewak | 5(9.4) | 48(90.6) | 34(64.2) | 19(35.8) | |
| Education level | Informal | 9(9.7) | 84(90.3) | 83(89.3) | 10(10.7) |
| Formal | 11(19.3) | 46(80.7) | 43(75.4) | 14(24.6) | |
| Occupation | Pastoralist | 8(13.8) | 50(86.2) | 53(91.4) | 5(8.6) |
| Agro pastoralist | 6(16.7) | 30(83.3) | 35(97.2) | 1(2.8) | |
| Others | 6(10.7) | 50(89.3) | 38(67.9) | 18(32.1) | |
| History of vaccination | yes | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | - | - |
| No | 20 (13.3) | 130(86.7) | 126(84.0) | 24(16.0) | |
| History of bite by | Yes | 17(14.4) | 101(85.6) | 105(89.0) | 13(11.0) |
| No | 3(9.4) | 29(86.6) | 21(65.6) | 11(34.4) | |
Fig 2Traveling and residence out of Gambella region among those with a history of the travel.
Sero-positivity for IgG antibody to YFV infection and associated factors (N = 135).
| Variables | Category | YF IgG sero-status | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total tested(N) | Positive N (%) | ||||
| Sex | Male | 84 | 3 (3.6) | 1.85(0.19, 18.30) | 1.32(0.10, 17.03) |
| Female | 51 | 1(2.0) | Ref | Ref | |
| Age Group (years) | 18–30 | 53 | 1(1.9) | 0.79(0.05, 12.99) | 0.77(0.03, 17.64) |
| 31–40 | 40 | 2(5.0) | 2.16(0.19, 24.77) | 2.29(0.17, 31.61) | |
| ≥41 | 42 | 1(2.4) | Ref | Ref | |
| Educational Status | Formal education | 51 | 2(3.9) | 1.7(0.23, 12.26) | 1.31(0.10, 17.23) |
| Informal education | 84 | 2(2.4) | Ref | Ref | |
| Occupation | pastoralist | 55 | 1(1.8) | Ref | Ref |
| Agro pastoralist | 32 | 1(3.1) | 1.74(0.10,28.84) | 1.92(0.11, 35.05) | |
| Others | 48 | 2(4.2) | 2.35(0.21, 26.73) | 1.18(0.05,25.41) | |
| History of residence/travel outside Gambella | Yes | 17 | 1 (5.9) | 2.4(0.23, 24.45) | 3.10(0.21, 44.56) |
| No | 118 | 3 (2.5) | Ref | Ref | |
| History of working in the forest areas | Yes | 113 | 3(2.6) | 0.57(0.06, 5.77) | 0.47(0.03, 7.68) |
| No | 22 | 1(4.5) | Ref | Ref | |
| History of Bite by | Yes | 109 | 3(2.7) | 0.54(0.05, 5.44) | 0.74(0.04, 12.25) |
| No | 26 | 1(3.85) | Ref | Ref | |
| District | Itang | 103 | 4(3.9) | - | - |
| Lare | 32 | 0(0.0) | - | - | |
| History of vaccination | Yes | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | ||
| No | 135 | 4(2.9) | - | - | |
CI (confidence interval), COR (crude odds ratio), and AOR (adjusted odds ratio), Ref (Reference category).
Seropositivity for IgG antibody to CHIKV and associated factors (N = 90).
| Variables | Category | CHIKV IgG sero-status | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total tested (N) | Positive N (%) | ||||
| Site | Itang | 58 | 12(20.7) | Ref | Ref |
| Lare | 32 | 2(6.3) | 0.25(0.05, 1.22) | 0.43(0.06,2.82) | |
| Sex | Male | 53 | 12(22.6) | 5.12(1.07, 24.46) | 3.78(0.58, 24.52) |
| Female | 37 | 2(5.4) | Reference | Reference | |
| Age Group (years) | 18–30 | 36 | 4(11.1) | 0.48(0.12, 1.89) | 0.75(0.11, 5.37) |
| 31–40 | 25 | 4(16.0) | 0.73 (0.18, 2.95) | 2.74(0.47, 16.08) | |
| ≥41 | 29 | 6(20.7) | Ref | Ref | |
| Educational Status | Informal education | 64 | 8(12.5) | Ref | Ref |
| Formal education | 26 | 6(23.1) | 2.1(0.65, 6.80) | 2.64(0.36, 19.29) | |
| Occupation | Pastoralist | 49 | 2(4.1) | Ref | Ref |
| Agro pastoralist | 26 | 9(34.6) | 12.44(2.44,63.47) | 14.17(2.30, 87.30) | |
| Others | 15 | 3(20.0) | 5.88(0.88, 39.21) | 2.20(0.17, 27.18) | |
| History of residence outside Gambella | Yes | 10 | 3(30.0) | 2.68(0.60, 11.98) | 2.44 (0.33, 17.69) |
| No | 80 | 11(13.7) | Ref | Ref | |
| History of working in the forest areas | Yes | 82 | 13(15.8) | 1.32(0.14, 11.64) | 0.90(0.05, 15.33) |
| No | 8 | 1(12.5) | Ref | Ref | |
| History of Bite by | Yes | 89 | 12(15.2) | 0.54(0.10, 2.98) | 0.73(0.1, 8.00) |
| No | 11 | 2(18.2) | Ref | Ref | |
CI (confidence interval), COR (crude odds ratio), AOR (adjusted odds ratio), and
*(significant at p<0.05), Ref (Reference category).
Seropositivity for IgG antibody to ZIKV and associated factors in the study participants (N = 150).
| Variables | Category | ZIKV IgG sero-status | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total tested N (%) | Positive N (%) | Equivocal N (%) | ||||
| Site | Itang | 117 | 15(12.8) | 2(1.7) | Ref | Ref |
| Lare | 33 | 26(18.8) | 0(0.0) | 21.8(8.20, 58.23) | 11.5(3.31, 39.81) | |
| Sex | Male | 96 | 15(15.6) | 1(1.0) | Ref | Ref |
| Female | 54 | 26(48.2) | 1(1.8) | 5.0(2.34, 10.65) | 4.8(1.62, 14.63) | |
| Age Group (years) | 18–30 | 57 | 23(40.3) | 0(0.0) | 2.1(0.90,4.8) | 1.5(0.39, 5.61) |
| 31–40 | 49 | 11(22.5) | 1(2.0) | 1.5(0.53, 4.0) | 0.80(0.21,3.13) | |
| ≥41 | 44 | 7(15.9) | 1(2.3) | Ref | Ref | |
| Educational Status | Informal education | 93 | 32(34.4) | 1(1.1) | 2.59(1.16, 5.76) | 1.0(0.28,3.68) |
| Formal education | 57 | 9(15.8) | 1(1.8) | Ref | Ref | |
| Occupation | Pastoralist | 58 | 32(55.2) | 1(1.7) | 8.2(2.78, 24.1) | 5.1(1.44, 17.80) |
| Others | 56 | 5(8.9) | 0(0.0) | 0.61(0.16, 2.27) | 1.5(0.27,8.22) | |
| Agro pastoralist | 36 | 4(11.1) | 1(2.8) | Ref | Ref | |
| History of residence /travel outside Gambella | Yes | 20 | 6(30.0) | 0(0.0) | 1.10(0.38, 3.0) | 1.4(0.29,6.65) |
| No | 130 | 35(26.9) | 2(1.5) | Ref | Ref | |
| History of working in the forest areas | Yes | 126 | 36 (28.6) | 2(1.6) | 1.64(0.57, 4.72) | 1.15(0.20, 6.49) |
| No | 24 | 5(20.8) | 0(0.0) | Ref | Ref | |
| History of bite by | Yes | 118 | 36(30.5) | 2(1.7) | 5.7(1.28, 25.37) | 1.34(0.21, 8.47) |
| No | 32 | 5(15.6) | 0(0.0) | Ref | Ref | |
CI (confidence interval), COR (crude odds ratio), AOR (adjusted odds ratio), and
*(significant at p<0.05), Ref (Reference category).