| Literature DB >> 34235372 |
Mursalin M Anis1, Jennylee Diaz1, Mausam Patel2, Adam T Lloyd1, David E Rosow1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Glottic keratosis poses a challenge because a decision to biopsy must weigh the likelihood of dysplasia and cancer against the voice outcome after biopsy. We determined the significance of laryngoscopic findings and agreement among clinicians to identify those specific findings. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: angiogenesis; erythroplakia; glottic keratosis; laryngeal cancer; leukoplakia
Year: 2021 PMID: 34235372 PMCID: PMC8113657 DOI: 10.1177/2473974X21994743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: OTO Open ISSN: 2473-974X
Biopsy Method and Pathology of Glottic Keratosis.[a]
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Office-based biopsy | 15 |
| Age of patient, mean ± SD, y | 79 ± 14 |
| Pathology | |
| High-grade dysplasia or carcinoma | 11 |
| Low-grade dysplasia | 2 |
| Benign polyp with keratosis and inflammation | 2 |
| Operative biopsy | 45 |
| Age of patient, mean ± SD, y | 68 ± 13 |
| Pathology | |
| High-grade dysplasia or carcinoma | 30 |
| Low-grade dysplasia | 4 |
| Benign | 11 |
| Hyperplastic squamous mucosa with keratosis | |
| Squamous mucosa with atypia and inflammation | |
| Vocal fold polyp with keratosis and inflammation | |
| Squamous papilloma | |
Values are presented as numbers unless otherwise indicated.
Figure 1.Laryngoscopic findings and histopathology in 60 patients with glottic keratosis. HD, high-grade dysplasia; LD, low-grade dysplasia; VS, aberrant microvasculature-like vascular speckling.
Interrater Reliability of Head and Neck Surgeons in Evaluating Glottic Keratosis.
| Laryngoscopic findings | Fleiss’s κ | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Morphology of keratosis[ | 0.63 | 0.44-0.81 |
| Distribution of keratosis[ | 0.60 | 0.42-0.79 |
| Erythema around keratosis | 0.35 | 0.17-0.53 |
| Vascular speckling on keratosis[ | 0.29 | 0.11-0.47 |
Mass morphology or flat morphology of keratosis.
Diffuse or keratosis confined to 1 vocal fold.
Abnormal microvasculature on or around keratosis. Intrarater reliability = 1 among all 4 head and neck surgeons.
Figure 2.Representative exams from the survey. (A) Keratotic mass (squamous cell carcinoma) with fullness (white arrow) under white light. (B) Lesion under virtual chromoendoscopy enhancing aberrant microvascularity (black bracket) adjacent to keratosis.
Interrater Reliability[a] With and Without Digital Processing Imaging Technology.
| Laryngoscopic findings | White light | Virtual chromoendoscopy |
|---|---|---|
| Morphology of keratosis[ | 0.66 (0.43-0.88) | 0.73 (0.38-1.1) |
| Distribution of keratosis[ | 0.53 (0.31-0.75) | 0.73 (0.38-1.1) |
| Erythema around keratosis | 0.25 (0.02-0.47) | 0.52 (0.17-0.88) |
| Vascular speckling on keratosis[ | 0.14 (-0.08-0.36) | 0.39 (0.04-0.75) |
Fleiss’s κ (95% CI).
Mass morphology or flat morphology of keratosis.
Diffuse or keratosis confined to 1 vocal fold.
Abnormal microvasculature on or around keratosis.
Agreement Between White Light and Virtual Chromoendoscopy.
| Laryngoscopic findings | Cohen’s κ (95% CI) |
|---|---|
| Morphology of keratosis[ | 0.78 (0.48 to 1.1) |
| Distribution of keratosis[ | 0.66 (0.35 to 0.96) |
| Erythema around keratosis | 0.22 (–0.23 to 0.67) |
| Vascular speckling on keratosis[ | 0.37 (–0.02 to 0.77) |
Mass morphology or flat morphology of keratosis.
Diffuse or keratosis confined to 1 vocal fold.
Abnormal microvasculature on or around keratosis.