| Literature DB >> 34233693 |
Mohammad Babaei1, Shahin Alizadeh-Fanalou2, Alireza Nourian3, Sahar Yarahmadi2, Navid Farahmandian2, Mohsen Nabi-Afjadi4, Iraj Alipourfard5, Elham Bahreini6.
Abstract
Structural and physiological changes in sperm and semen parameters reduce fertility in diabetic patients. Securigera Securidaca (S. Securidaca) seed is a herbal medicine with hypoglycemic, antioxidant, and anti-hypertensive effects. The question now is whether this herbal medicine improves fertility in diabetic males. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of hydroalcoholic extract of S. Securidaca seeds (HESS), glibenclamide and a combination of both on fertility in hyperglycemic rats by comparing histological and some biochemical changes in testicular tissue and sperm parameters. The treatment protocol included administration of three doses of HESS and one dose of glibenclamide, as well as treatment with both in diabetic Wistar diabetic rats and comparison of the results with untrated groups. The quality of the testicular tissue as well as histometric parameters and spermatogenesis indices were evaluated during histopathological examination. Epididymal sperm analysis including sperm motility, viability, abnormalities, maturity, and chromatin structure were studied. The effect of HESS on the expression of LDH and FGF21 genes and tissue levels of glycogen, lactate, and total antioxidant capacity in testicular tissue was investigated and compared with glibenclamide. HESS improved sperm parameters in diabetic rats but showed little restorative effect on damaged testicular tissue. In this regard, glibenclamide was more effective than the highest dose of HESS and its combination with HESS enhanced its effectiveness so that histological tissue characteristics and sperm parameters were were comparable to those of healthy rats. The expression level of testicular FGF21 gene increased in diabetic rats, which intensified after treatment with HESS as well as glibenclamide. The combination of HESS and glibenclamide restored the expression level of testicular LDH gene, as well as tissue storage of glycogen, lactate and LDH activity, and serum testosterone to the levels near healthy control. S. Securidaca seeds can be considered as an effective supplement in combination with hypoglycemic drugs to prevent infertility complications in diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: FGF21; Fertility; Glibenclamide; Glycogen; LDH; Securigera Securidaca; Sperm parameters
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34233693 PMCID: PMC8262065 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00794-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Primer sequences for RT-qPCR
| Forward primer (5′-3′) | Melting temperature (Tm) | |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | TCATCAACGGCACAGTCAAGG TTCTGCATGGTGGTGAAGACG | 60.88 60.88 |
| LDH-C | TTTAGCCTTTTCCTCAGCACTCC AGTCTAGGTTACAGCCACTTCC | 60.81 59.17 |
| FGF-21 | TTCGGGACTGTGGGTCTGTCTC TTTGCAGGTGGGCTTCGGTG | 62.6 62.1 |
Fig. 1Type A spermatogonia (dotted arrow): inactive type with pale nuclei; Type B spermatogonia (arrow): the active type with dark nuclei
Effects of different doses of HESS and glibenclamide on gonadal mass and sperm parameters
| Groups | TW (g) | GSI (%) | Total sperm count (× 107) /mLof HTF | Viability (%) | Motility (%) | DNA-damage (%) | Abnormality (%) | Maturity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 1.62 ± 0.09b | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 99.40 ± 2.7 b | 89.4 ± 3.6 b | 87.8 ± 3.1 b | 6.4 ± 1.8 b | 11.6 ± 1.8 b | 98.4 ± 1.5 b |
| DC | 1.33 ± 0.05a | 0.55 ± 0.09 | 48.60 ± 3.5 a | 47.8 ± 5.8 a | 54.0 ± 6.0 a | 34.2 ± 2.6 a | 38.0 ± 3.4 a | 84.8 ± 0.5 a |
| HESS-100 | 1.44 ± 0.03a | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 50.40 ± 3.6 a | 58.4 ± 2.9 a | 56.6 ± 6.6 a | 30.4 ± 1.1 a | 34.0 ± 4.5 a | 86.4 ± 2.1 a |
| HESS-200 | 1.47 ± 0.07 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 57.80 ± 4.2 a | 63.4 ± 4.0 a | 60.8 ± 4.8 a | 28.8 ± 1.6 a | 30.4 ± 5.6 a | 87.0 ± 1.2 a |
| HESS-400 | 1.52 ± 0.1b | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 60.50 ± 3.1 a | 71.0 ± 2.9 a | 63.0 ± 5.1 a | 24.7 ± 1.3 a | 28.0 ± 1.8 a | 90.2 ± 1.7 a |
| G | 1.54 ± 0.1b | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 94.20 ± 2.4b | 80.0 ± 3.8 b | 79.2 ± 4.1 b | 11.6 ± 2.4 b | 17.2 ± 2.9 b | 94.4 ± 2.7 b |
| G + HESS-200 | 1.49 ± 0.04b | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 96.80 ± 3.5 b | 85.6 ± 4.8 b | 82.4 ± 2.4 b | 11.0 ± 2.7 b | 13.0 ± 3.1 b | 95.0 ± 1.6 b |
| G + HESS-400 | 1.50 ± 0.05b | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 98.80 ± 1.9 b | 86.2 ± 4.3 b | 85.4 ± 4.6 b | 10.6 ± 2.9 b | 11.8 ± 4.1 b | 97.0 ± 2.7 b |
| P-value | 0.001 | 0.93 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Testicular weight (TW), gonadosomatic indices (GSI), HESS (hydroalcoholic extract of S. securidaca seeds); G (glibenclamide); DC (diabetic control); NC (normal control)
a: statistically significant difference with NC group
b: statistically significant difference with DC group
Fig. 2Photomicrographs of spermatozoa stained with specific methods for different purposes. A) Aniline blue for differentiation of immature (a, with a blue stained head) and mature (b, unstained) sperms. B) Eosin-Y-0.05% that distinguishes live sperms with uncolored heads (a) from dead ones with red-stained heads (b). C) Acridine-Orange, which differentiates sperms with intact chromatin structure (a, with a green fluorescence illuminating head) from those with denatured chromatin (b with a reddish-orange head. D) Eosin-Nigrosine for detection of sperms with morphological abnormalities
Fig. 3Morphological assessment of testicular tissue. A) Normal control group with typical seminiferous tubules showing the consecutive stages of spermatogenesis. B) Diabetic control group, C) HESS-100 group, D) HESS-200 group and E) HESS-400 group with tissue atrophy and degenerative changes in the seminiferous tubules including shrinkage, hypocellularity, vacuolation and rupture of the epithelium, and disrupted spermatogenesis. F) G (glibenclamide) group, G) G + HESS-200 group and H) G + HESS-400 group with mild histomorphological changes compared to the NC group
Spermatogenesis indices in the study groups
| Groups | TDI (%) | SI (%) | RI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 90.7 ± 2.5 b | 94.1 ± 3.0 b | 94 ± 2.6 b |
| DC | 60.9 ± 3.3 a | 49.9 ± 3.3 a | 55 ± 2.7 a |
| HESS-100 | 64 ± 3.2 a | 51.1 ± 2.7 a | 58.2 ± 1.4 a |
| HESS-200 | 68.4 ± 1.7 a | 57.2 ± 2.5 a | 59.3 ± 1.5 a |
| HESS-400 | 72.8 ± 2.5 b | 62.9 ± 2.7 b | 63.7 ± 3.0 b |
| G | 81.4 ± 3.0 b | 78.9 ± 2.1 b | 82.6 ± 4.5 b |
| G + HESS-200 | 88 ± 2.1 b | 88.8 ± 3.1 b | 89 ± 1.8 b |
| G + HESS-400 | 89.2 ± 2.2 b | 90.4 ± 1.8 b | 89.5 ± 2.7 b |
| P-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
TDI (Tubular Differentiation Index), SI (Spermatogenesis Index) and RI (Repopulation Index)
a: statistically significant difference with NC group
b: statistically significant difference with DC group
Histometrical parameters in the study groups
| Groups | STsD (µm) | GEH (µm) | TCD (µm) | STsLD (µm) | TDP (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 375.53 ± 17.8 b | 131.66 ± 13.5 b | 20.4 ± 2.44 b | 93.39 ± 6.27 b | 5.6 ± 1.14 b |
| DC | 204.99 ± 12.3 a | 85.17 ± 4.7 a | 39.94 ± 2.77 a | 67.49 ± 5.73 a | 16.2 ± 3.27 a |
| HESS-100 | 210.91 ± 14.6 a | 87.75 ± 4.7 a | 39.72 ± 2.92 a | 68.92 ± 6.14 a | 15.8 ± 2.39 a |
| HESS-200 | 218.73 ± 13.6 a | 89.44 ± 2.7 a | 36.89 ± 3.59 a | 68.115 ± 5.49 a | 15.6 ± 4.22 a |
| HESS-400 | 230.1 ± 9.4 a | 95.9 ± 4.7 a | 37.91 ± 2.51 a | 69.6 ± 3.66 a | 15.6 ± 3.91 a |
| G | 319.66 ± 39.3 b | 122.26 ± 7.7 b | 26.82 ± 3.17 b | 84.17 ± 5.83 b | 8.4 ± 2.41 b |
| G + HESS-200 | 339.22 ± 27.3 b | 127.72 ± 6.6 b | 22.46 ± 3.15 b | 87.52 ± 7.23 b | 7.6 ± 2.97 b |
| G + HESS-400 | 356.26 ± 25.25 b | 129.63 ± 7.43 b | 22.22 ± 4.61 b | 89.67 ± 4.28 b | 6.8 ± 4.32 b |
| P-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
STsD (seminiferous tubules diameter), GEH (germinal epithelium height), TCD (testicular capsule diameter), STsLD (seminiferous tubules lumen diameter), TDP (Tubular Degeneration percentage)
a: statistically significant difference with NC group
b: statistically significant difference with DC group
Biochemical parameters of studied groups
| Groups | Serum TS | Tissue lactate | Tissue LDH | Testicular glycogen | Testicular FRAP | Serum insulin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 0.098 ± 0.008b | 3.80 ± 0.2b | 187.1 ± 8.5b | 0.47 ± 0.01b | 8.66 ± 0.35b | 1.97 ± 0.15b |
| DC | 0.079 ± 0.001a | 2.62 ± 0.29a | 171.9 ± 1.4a | 0.34 ± 0.02a | 6.55 ± 0.34a | 1.18 ± 0.09a |
| HESS-100 | 0.079 ± 0.001a | 2.78 ± 0.14a | 174.7 ± 3.0a | 0.36 ± 0.02a | 6.50 ± 0.36a | 1.4 ± 0.05a,b |
| HESS-200 | 0.081 ± 0.004a | 2.90 ± 0.24a | 176.9 ± 2.9a | 0.37 ± 0.01a | 6.64 ± 0.37a | 1.54 ± 0.07a,b |
| HESS-400 | 0.090 ± 0.003b | 3.24 ± 0.1a,b | 179.5 ± 1.3b | 0.41 ± 0.08a,b | 7.05 ± 0.12a | 1.56 ± 0.09a,b |
| G | 0.096 ± 0.003b | 3.36 ± 0.23b | 181.4 ± 2.2b | 0.44 ± 0.02b | 7.64 ± 0.28a,b | 1.75 ± 0.07a,b |
| G + HESS-200 | 0.096 ± 0.001b | 3.39 ± 0.16b | 182.8 ± 1.1b | 0.43 ± 0.02b | 7.63 ± 0.41a,b | 1.80 ± 0.09b |
| G + HESS-400 | 0.100 ± 0.006b | 3.63 ± 0.31b | 184.1 ± 1.0b | 0.44 ± 0.02b | 7.70 ± 0.33a,b | 1.82 ± 0.09b |
| P-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
TS (Testosterone), LDH (lactate dehydrogenase), FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power)
a: statistically significant difference with NC group
b: statistically significant difference with DC group
Fig. 4LDH gene expression levels (A), and comparison of fold changes (B) in the testicular tissue in different groups
Fig. 5FGF21 gene expression levels (A), and comparison of fold changes (B) in the testicular tissue in different groups