| Literature DB >> 24799635 |
Rosita A Condorelli, Enzo Vicari, Aldo E Calogero, Sandro La Vignera1.
Abstract
Male accessory gland inflammation or infection (MAGI) is a potentially underdiagnosed complication of type 2 diabetes (DM2); specifically, we reported in a recent study that the frequency of MAGI was 43% among DM2 patients. In previous studies, we have demonstrated that diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) is associated with a peculiar ultrasound characterization of the seminal vesicles (SVs) in DM2 patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the frequency of MAGI in two different categories of DM2 patients (i.e. patients with and without symptoms that possibly reflect DAN) and the respective ultrasound characterizations. Sixty DM2 patients with a mean (± s.e.m.) age of 42.0 ± 6.0 years (range: 34-47 years) were classified according to the presence or the absence of symptoms that could possibly reflect DAN (group A: DM2 with symptoms possibly reflecting DAN, n = 28 patients and group B: DM2 without symptoms possibly reflecting DAN, n = 32 patients). The patients in Group A exhibited a significantly higher frequency of MAGI compared with those in group B patients (P < 0.05); moreover, the Group A patients exhibited a significantly higher frequency of ultrasound signs suggestive of vesiculitis (P < 0.05). Finally, the concentrations of lymphocytes but not the concentrations of the leukocytes in the semen were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in group A compared with group B.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24799635 PMCID: PMC4215658 DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.125911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Androl ISSN: 1008-682X Impact factor: 3.285
The clinical criteria adopted for the diagnosis of MAGI (WHO, 1993)6
Main clinical characteristics of the two groups examined
Symptoms possibly reflecting autonomic neuropathy detected in group A patients (at least two by type)
Ultrasound criteria for MAGI
Hormonal and sperm parameters of the two examined groups
Detection of the diagnostic criteria for MAGI in the two groups examined
Ultrasound evaluations of the DM2 patients with MAGI (DAN+ vs DAN–)
Sperm parameters of the DM2 patients with MAGI (DAN+ vs DAN–)