Literature DB >> 34232408

Odontoid Type II fractures in elderly: what are the real management goals and how to best achieve them? A multicenter European study on functional outcome.

Salvatore Chibbaro1, Charles-Henry Mallereau2, Mario Ganau3, Ismail Zaed4, Maria Teresa Bozzi1, Antonino Scibilia1, Helene Cebula1, Irene Ollivier1, Marie-Pierre Loit1, Dominique Chaussemy1, Hugo-Andres Coca1, Guillaume Dannhoff1, Antonio Romano5, Beniamino Nannavecchia6, Arthur Gubian7, Giorgio Spatola8, Francesco Signorelli9, Corrado Iaccarino10,11, Raoul Pop12, François Proust1, Seyyid Baloglu12, Julien Todeschi1.   

Abstract

Odontoid fractures constitute the most common cervical fractures in elderly. External immobilization is the treatment of choice for Type I and III; there is still no wide consensus about the best management of Type II fractures. Observational multicenter study was conducted on a prospectively built database on elderly patients (> 75 years) with Type II odontoid fracture managed conservatively during the last 10 years. All patients underwent CT scan on admission and at 3 months; if indicated, selected patient had CT scan at 6 and 12 months. All patients were clinically evaluated by Neck Disability Index (NDI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification (ASA) on admission; NDI was assessed also at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months; furthermore, a quality of life (QoL) assessment with the SF-12 form was performed at 3 and 12 months. Among the 260 patients enrolled, 177 (68%) were women and 83 (32%) men, with a median age of 83 years. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months: 247 (95%) showed an excellent functional outcome within 6 weeks, among them 117 (45%) showed a good bony healing, whereas 130 (50%) healed in pseudo-arthrosis. The residual 5% were still variably symptomatic at 12 weeks; however, only 5 out of 13 (2% of the total cohort) required delayed surgery. This study showed that a conservative approach to odontoid Type II fracture in elderly is an effective and valid option, resulting in an excellent functional outcome (regardless of bony fusion) in the majority of cases. Failure of conservative treatment can be safely addressed with surgical fixation at a later stage.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conservative management; Elderly; External immobilization; Functional outcome; Surgery; Type II odontoid fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34232408     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01594-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  36 in total

Review 1.  A review of halo vest treatment of upper cervical spine injuries.

Authors:  U Vieweg; R Schultheiss
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Management of Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly: A Review of the Literature and an Evidence-Based Treatment Algorithm.

Authors:  Sravisht Iyer; R John Hurlbert; Todd J Albert
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Controversies in the Management of Geriatric Odontoid Fractures.

Authors:  Scott C Wagner; Gregory D Schroeder; Christopher K Kepler; Alexander J Schupper; Frank Kandziora; Emiliano N Vialle; Cumhur Oner; Michael G Fehlings; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Fractures of the odontoid process.

Authors:  S Govender; J F Maharaj; M R Haffajee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-11

Review 5.  Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: an evidence-based narrative review of management.

Authors:  D Pal; P Sell; M Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Management of type II odontoid fractures in the geriatric population: outcome of treatment in a rigid cervical orthosis.

Authors:  Ali Chaudhary; Brian Drew; Robert Douglas Orr; Forough Farrokhyar
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-07

7.  Proposal of a modified, treatment-oriented classification of odontoid fractures.

Authors:  Jonathan N Grauer; Bilal Shafi; Alan S Hilibrand; James S Harrop; Brian K Kwon; John M Beiner; Todd J Albert; Michael G Fehlings; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  The epidemiology of fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine.

Authors:  M D Ryan; J J Henderson
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Structural heterogeneity within the axis: the main cause in the etiology of dens fractures. A histomorphometric analysis of 37 normal and osteoporotic autopsy cases.

Authors:  M Amling; M Pösl; V J Wening; H Ritzel; M Hahn; G Delling
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Predictors of treatment outcomes in geriatric patients with odontoid fractures: AOSpine North America multi-centre prospective GOF study.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Ranganathan Arun; Alexander R Vaccaro; Paul M Arnold; Jens R Chapman; Branko Kopjar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.